|
A major news service ran a couple of feature stories on the Internet this
week on the topic of high gas prices. Although different in the details, it
was substantially similar to articles they've run off and on over the past
two years. This particular article seems to appear whenever gas prices get
so high that Americans start grumbling and passing around that chain e-mail
about boycotting ExxonMobil.
They really outdid themselves this time, though. The writers offered some
not-so-valuable advice on how readers could "profit" from high gas prices:
buy stock in the big oil oligopolies like BP Amoco and ExxonMobil. (As if the
average American can afford to drop $8,200 on 100 shares of XOM, which, as
we're about to discover, is about the same amount they're paying on their yearly
gas bills.) With "advice" like this it's little wonder that people are increasingly
tuning out the mainstream media and looking to the alternative press to get
the real news of the day.
But the most shocking part of the article was the admission that millions
of Americans are "feeling broke" yet can't seem to figure out why. The article
tells them why: because the average American is spending over $8,000 per year
or more on gasoline alone. If you do the math you will find that comes to almost
one-fourth of the average yearly income of a single adult. This amounts to
highway robbery on the grandest scale imaginable. The government constantly
warns us of the so-called terrorist threat, yet the only place one ever sees
hostages being taken is at the pumps.
Speaking of terrorism, it is becoming increasingly obvious the real reason
for the persistently high gas prices. Has it occurred to anyone that we are
now four years into a war with Iraq and yet we haven't seen any noteworthy
increases in taxes? The Bush Administration has in fact gone out of its way
to portray itself as a tax-cutting regime for the benefit of the American businessman.
Truth be told, Bush & Co. are so unpopular right now that any attempt on
their part to overtly increase taxes would see them all run out of Washington
on a rail. Yet have you ever heard of a major war being fought that didn't
involve an increase in taxes? After all, wars are brutally expensive affairs
that can easily run into the hundreds of billions of dollars. So who is financing
this war?
In his magnum opus, "A History of the English-Speaking Peoples" (Volume 1),
Sir Winston Churchill, himself and insider who rubbed elbows with the "illuminati" types,
wrote that it has always been the policy of big governments from old English
times onward to borrow money for war, whenever practicable, from large commercial
concerns. For instance, the English kings of old were wont to take out loans
from the leading monopolists of the day, the wool merchants, for waging expensive
wars. This provided a rather indirect route to much needed monies for the war
chest. And it obviated the need to press upon the easily agitated citizenry
for funding the most expensive of endeavors....at least temporarily.
Taking a page from this old English custom, the Bush regime is obviously obtaining
massive funds for waging the Iraqi war from the major oil companies. In turn,
the oil companies are extracting money from the retail end-user, namely you
and me, to provide short-term servicing of this war debt. On top of that, the
oil conglomerates will reap the further benefits of Middle East colonization
as the rich plum of Iraq's oil falls into their collective lap.
Meanwhile, back at home, the debt our government has taken on will have to
be paid the only way it knows how -- by passing it on to the citizens in the
form of taxation. Yes, fellow citizens, higher taxes are coming. But the taxes
likely won't arrive until after the Bush administration exits and the new regime
enters (likely the second Clinton Administration). Are you beginning to see
a pattern emerging here: a Bush administration comes alone (1988-1992) and
with it comes an oil price spike and a war in Iraq. Then along comes a Clinton
(1992-2000) and we see falling oil and gas prices but huge increases in bureaucracy
and taxation. Then another Bush regime (2000-2008) and more high oil/gas prices
and another war in Iraq. When Hillary arrives in 2009 we'll likely witness
the return of deflation and more new taxes. (At this point I can't help but
think of dear old Churchill, who would no doubt be proud to find that the old
British custom of dynastic monarchy has been revived in modern-day America
in the form of the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton line.)
We now arrive at the conundrum of the day, viz. how will Americans be able
to pay the next round of tax increases in 2009 and beyond if they've been tapped
dry by the onerous "tax" of high gas prices? The answer is obvious: the bull
market will be allowed to continue but with a twist. This time the average
retail investor will be invited along to participate fully without being beaten
over the head by the big stick of fear the mainstream press has been using
against him since 2004. The return of the retail investor will be accomplished
by way of a much needed priming of the money and credit pump, among other things.
Once the banks have done their part to fully re-liquify the monetary system,
Americans will use the massive infusions of cash as an opportunity to participate
in building up another speculative bubble, which will be bolstered by increases
in productivity, job growth and the next wave in the technology revolution.
Bubbles are products of forethought by the insiders, however, and this one
will be used to increase America's collective bank account for the next round
of taxes in 2009 and beyond.
The wise and prudent reader will no doubt use this coming time of temporary
prosperity to bolster his financial position and prepare for the coming onslaught
of 2009 and beyond.
|