|
How big of a problem is the oil supply situation? The latest report from the
International Energy Agency warns that the world will face an oil crunch in
five years. IEA said that supply was falling faster than expected in major
producing areas while consumption is accelerating thanks to strong economic
growth in emerging countries.
To listen to some commentators, the world faces an impending economic cataclysm
over what we are told is a major reduction in the available supply of oil.
To others, the currently high oil price is a response not so much to actual
supply as it is an inefficiency (whether contrived or accidental) in getting
oil and its by-products to retail market channels. And yet another theory is
that today's high oil price is a hidden "tax" on consumers to help pay for
a long-term war effort in the Middle East (with its obvious benefits to the
oil oligopoly).
Which of these theories seems to command the greatest attention from investors?
To answer that question you need look no further than the leading financial
web sites. Investors aren't shy about sharing their opinions on this matter
to those who publicly comment on it. Here are some of the responses I've received
lately concerning the oil conundrum:
"If you want to read about the future, start reading about peak oil. World
oil production probably peaked in mid-2005, but time will tell. The next 5-year
situation depends on whether the Saudis can produce more oil. Their production
went down 2005 to 2006, but they still talk about raising production levels
due to several billion dollars they are now spending to increase oil production.
Their biggest producer, Ghawar, is dying. The next few years will tell us how
fast it is dying. Do you believe these Arabs? I don't, and many experts on
the subject don't either. So we are about to get hit with a major blow to the
economy. It will also slow down the Chinese. If it slows down the Chinese enough,
then we have an immediate depression."
Let's call the above sentiment the "Oil Depression Scenario." It's representative
of much of the talk out there in Internet land and is a theory that's gaining
increasing acceptance from many investors.
Another commonly held conception over the oil supply scenario is this:
"Expect all US commerce to start raising prices as they realize this is not
just another short term spike in oil prices caused by Big Oil monopoly or OPEC
conspiracy. The world doesn't have the conventional oil. The unconventional
oil and renewable resources will take years to deliver in sufficient quantities.
Look for 1970s type gas station lines and government emergency energy efficiency
mandates starting maybe next summer, but certainly by 2010."
Let's call this one the "Oil Inflation Scenario." This theory holds that we're
in for a repetition of hyper-inflation a' la 30 years ago. Its based on the
assumption that global oil supply is extremely limited and diminishing fast.
Keep in mind that there is an emotional bias and psychology behind the above
sentiment from the individual investor's standpoint. This isn't simply a cold
academic theory. It's part of the Emotional Belief System (EBS) of many individuals
and as such it colors their investment decisions in many different market sectors.
We know from the classical rules governing commodity price analysis that "price
cures price." Simply put this means that at some point along the curve of a
rising price trend there is a point at which high prices evoke a reversal in
demand and a period of falling prices follows. A sustained uptrend in any commodity
also tends to stimulate greater production of that commodity, adding to the
supply; rising prices also galvanize the search for lower-cost alternatives
to that particular commodity. This process is already well underway in response
to the long-term bull market in crude oil and we've already seen evidence of
price curing price in the intermediate-term. Consider: since last July the
oil price has essentially fluctuated in a range between the all-time high of
$77/barrel and the yearly low of $50. One year may not seem like a long time
to some, but for an essential commodity that is supposedly facing a major long-term
supply problem, that year-long trading range doesn't speak very highly of the
theory of a catastrophic supply shortage.

Do you remember the Hunt Brother's corner of the silver market from the late
'70s? You may remember the hyperbole that was typical of the market talk of
those days when wild-eyed commodity speculators spoke of a massive supply shortage
and a limitless rise in the silver price. Basically every major spike in a
commodity price throughout history has sparked the same kind of talk we're
hearing about oil supply right now. And how does it always end? With a sudden
(and quite unexpected) outpouring of supply onto the market that seemingly
comes out of nowhere, and a corresponding fall in price. There has never in
commodity price history been an exception to this rule.
The one thing we learn from history is that it always repeats. This also includes
commodity price history and this shows us that every major bull market in any
given commodity is always accompanied by its own supply crunch scenario. Remember
the prospect of "beans in the teens" in the 1970s? Remember the sugar supply
scare of 1980 when the price went skyrocketing from 7 cent/lb. to 45 cent/lb.?
Remember the corn shock of 1995-96? Or more recently, the platinum price shock
of 2000? All of these "crises" were eventually resolved as price cured price.
If you listen to the propaganda of the commodity exchanges you'll be told
that commodity futures contracts can be likened to insurance policies that
help producers hedge against market volatility. But there's another adage that
says commodity futures were created so that producers and other vested interests
could manipulate prices up and down to their advantage, as well as to put their
smaller competitors out of business. I don't know about you but I strongly
suspect the latter bromide comes closer to the truth. This could apply to the
crude oil market in a number of ways.
Though it is speculation on my part, I have no doubt that there are supplies
of oil and natural gas out there ready and waiting to come to market at such
time as the market makers feel the need is right (by their standards). It is
no speculation to note that there are massive natural gas wells within our
own country that could be tapped in short order to relieve a high gas price.
It's also no secret that there are many capped oil wells out there that could
also be brought back into production if/when needed by the controllers. The
oil supply conundrum is not an unsolvable one by any stretch, certainly not
in the 10-20 year outlook.
Instead of fretting over the "peak oil" misconception and focusing attention
on insufficient alternatives like solar, wind and ethanol, investors should
instead look at the emerging technologies currently being developed that promise
to relieve, in part, our dependence on oil. One example would include Pebble
Bed Reactor technology (PBR). PBR involves nuclear technology that is far more
efficient than classical nuclear reactors and much safer. PBR can also be used
to produce hydrogen, which in turn can be used as vehicular fuel. It is being
operated in the prototype phase in China and South Africa.
At every major turning point there is a time, just before the pivotal point,
when everything looks hopeless. Some would call this the "darkness before dawn." We
are now at a critical turning point in regard to our relationship with the
industrial-petroleum complex. Things may look hopeless now, but what's to prevent
the surprise introduction of an efficient and workable energy alternative?
Revolutionary technologies always come about when they are needed most and
we know that the technologies are there -- it's just a matter of getting them
to market.
What the solution will be is anyone's guess and would be futile to even speculate.
What we do know is that the oil problem has reached the point of maximum recognition,
i.e. virtually everyone recognizes there is "no way out" regarding the oil
problem. We know from history that when any crucial problem reaches the point
of maximum recognition the reversal of the problem is imminent. It stands to
reason therefore that the "solution" to the oil crisis (and there is always
a solution to every manufactured crisis) has already been packaged behind the
scenes. It's simply a matter of time before the solution is unwrapped for all
eyes to behold.
If oil supply isn't the problem then why would the oil price be as high as
it is? It's sometimes easy to forget that we're living in a war-time economy
and in a war economy commodity prices tend to be high for prolonged periods.
The oil price in particular will be influenced by the war for various reasons,
not the least of which is the need for war financing. Because of the deeply
vested interest the oil oligopoly has in the Middle East war, we can assume
the oil price will remain buoyant for the duration of the war. The long-term
uptrend will remain intact; however, there will be every effort made at preventing
sustained run-ups in the oil price. We need look no further than the oil price
trading history of the past year (see chart above) for an example of how this
game is being played.
|