|
Many proclaim that the recent decline below the June 2007 lows by the Industrials
and the Transports served to trigger a Dow theory sell signal. Based on the
evidence as I read the averages, this is not the case.
The extended advance up out of the 2002/2003 lows has proven to be one of
the longest advances in stock market history. As a result, it has proven that
the single most important aspect of Dow theory is price and that what we may
perceive as value or a given market phasing is in fact secondary. In other
words, price itself is the single most important aspect of Dow theory and the
old time Dow theorists knew it.
In Robert Rhea's work titled The Story of the Averages, it is made
very clear by the numerous examples that confirmation of a Primary up trend
occurs when both averages better their previous Secondary High Point and that
a Primary down trend is established when both averages violate their previous
Secondary Low Point.
Moving on to the chart below and according to this basic principle of Dow
theory, the Primary Trend turned up, or in Rhea's words it was "authoritatively
established as bullish," way back in June 2003 when the 2002 Secondary
highs were bettered. Since that time the averages have made six consecutively
higher advances. Each of these advances have established yet a higher Secondary
High and Low Point with the last joint closing high that occurred on July 19th
having marked the 6th Secondary High Point since the 2002/2003 lows. Many are
looking at the joint decline below the June 2007 lows as having violated the
previous Secondary Low Point and thereby confirming the Primary Trend as being
down. I do not believe this to be correct because the June lows were not, in
my opinion, sufficient enough to be classified as having marked a Secondary
Low Point. It is my belief that the decline from the July 19th joint high marked
the beginning of the decline into a new Secondary Low Point. Thus, the market
is still fishing for the next Secondary Low Point and at this time the previous
Secondary Low point also remains intact. Therefore, from my perspective of
Dow theory, the Primary Trend remains bullish.

We also find in Robert Rhea's writings this specific quote about the transition
between bull and bear markets. "Under Dow's theory the primary trend, once
authoritatively established as bullish, is considered to be continuing in force
until negated by a confirmed bearish indication such as would be the case when,
after a reaction of full secondary proportions in a bull market, a rally fails
to lift both averages to new high ground, and a later decline carries both
averages below the preceding secondary low."
If we apply what Rhea is saying here to the current market, the averages would
first have to establish a Secondary Low Point, which again I believe it is
now doing. Then, from that low the averages will have to fail to better the
July 19th highs and then turn down below the Secondary Lows that are now being
established in order to confirm that the Primary Trend has turned from bullish
to bearish.
Therefore, based on the fact that the averages have not yet violated their
previous Secondary Low Points nor have the averages experienced a failed rally
followed by a decline below their previous Secondary Low Points, I cannot find
justification to say that the Primary Trend, in accordance to the Dow theory,
has turned bearish.
Now, looking at the market from a cyclical and statistical perspective, which
has absolutely nothing to do with Dow theory, all indications continue to suggest
that the market is extremely over extended in what has now become the second
longest advancing 4-year cycle in stock market history. The Dow theory simply
has not confirmed a Primary Trend change at this point. Anyway, this extended
move has obviously been fueled by the liquidity campaign to keep the market
advancing.
However, even the Fed can only do so much. The intermediate-term internals
have been fading as the markets "broke out" into their recent new highs. New
lows are registering readings not seen in years and the intermediate-term breadth
indicators that I follow have been weak for months. The issue now is that the
market has become so stretched on such weak internals that it is becoming increasingly
harder to keep the advance going. I believe that the Fed understands the house
of cards very well and an example of this came with the massive liquidity infusion
reported by CNBC on Thursday when the market once again began to soften. There
are two noteworthy points to be made here. One, the Fed knows the danger of
the market and stepped in with the liquidity to try to save it on Thursday,
but it still fell some 387 points. So, it is getting harder and harder to save.
Two, if the market wasn't at great risk do you think the Fed would be taking
the measures that they are? No, they are afraid to let any reasonable correction
begin because they know the risk of an implosion. Maybe the market can be saved
again and maybe it can't. But, it really doesn't matter because even if it
is saved again, it will be on even worse internals and create even greater
complacency. The market is stretched well beyond any historical norm and this
cannot continue forever. Ultimately the Fed is fighting a losing battle. The
internals stink and the decline into the now very extended 4-year cycle low
is coming and there will ultimately be nothing the Fed can do to stop it. You
have been warned!
I have begun doing free Friday market commentary that is available to everyone
at www.cyclesman.com/Articles.htm so
please begin joining me there. Should you be interested in analysis that provides
intermediate-term turn points utilizing the Cycle Turn Indicator on stock market,
the dollar, bonds, gold, silver, oil, gasoline, the XAU and more, then please
visit www.cyclesman.com for more details.
In the August newsletter I also provide specific details about the 4-year cycle
and what is expected. A subscription includes access to the monthly issues
of Cycles News & Views covering the Dow theory, and very detailed statistical
based analysis plus updates 3 times a week.
|