|
With the financial markets doing their best impression of a tinderbox waiting
for a spark, it is not easy to use the word 'oversold' without cracking a smile.
After all, if the S&P 500 - which closed less than 1-point below its
200 DMA yesterday - was really 'oversold' it would not normally be trading
only 6.4% off of its recent highs (market corrections are generally -10% and
bear markets are -20%).
Needless to say, this is not a normal stock market, and these are hardly normal
times. Rather, the largely secretive dealings of hedge funds control the tape,
and unpredictable capital flows from central bankers and foreign investors
can swing asset prices wildly about. Talk all you want about corporate America's
attractive balance sheet, or those beautiful trailing P/Es, this market is
controlled by unknown and volatile forces.
Incidentally, while on the topic of P/Es, isn't it amusing to see Abby Joseph
Cohen go on about how attractive forward P/E multiples are given that
she ignored P/Es completely when concocting her bullish biases during the late
1990s stock market mania? Apparently corporate fundamentals are important to
Ms. Cohen, that is so long as everyone isn't acting like a bunch of raving
lunatics (in which case she joins the party and ignores any and all of the
'fundamentals').
Regardless, amidst all the uncertainty and bailout efforts happening today,
a couple of lesser covered events could make for a more volatile marketplace
over the next two weeks.
More Hedge Fund Confessions?
"Wednesday marks 45 days before the end of the quarter, the deadline by
which most hedge fund investors must notify the funds if they want to redeem
their investments." NYT
As if hedge fund investors do not have enough to worry about, a wave of redemptions
could sweep over hedge-land in the next two sessions. Does this mean more funds
will announce that since NAVs are incalculable redemptions are halted? If so,
market reaction to these announcements may not be favorable.
From Credit Crunch To Short Squeeze?
One item of interest not getting much play today is short selling. The uptick
rule was ditched on July 6, 2007, and since then the NYSE has released only
one short interest report. You guessed it, short interest hit a record high
in July - its fifth monthly record in a row.

Not only does the NYSE say that this the most heavily shorted market in history
(at more than $560 billion in shares short), but that more than $218 billion
in short positions have been added since July 2006.

Given that the short seller's padded their positions even as stocks hit record
highs earlier this year, the speculation that the shorts are going to stick
around for awhile has merit. Nevertheless, there remains the possibility that
the shorts were dangerously front-running the highly anticipated SEC rule change
rather than making sound long-term bets against stocks. Moreover, you have
to concede that with gold unable to get kick-started and central banks aggressively
eying the market's liquidity situation, there exists the possibility for a
short covering/relief rally from hell. Did I mention the S&P 500 ended
less than 1-point below its 200 DMA yesterday? Is this not a good enough level
for the Cohen's to hop back in?
A Couple of Events...
Assuming hedge fund redemptions do not slam the market first, the short selling
data for August, which will be released next week, could play an important
role in setting the tone for the markets leading into September. Quite
frankly, at what point do even the most steadfast bears have to open up to
the possibility that the tinderbox may not be overvalued stock prices, but
the shorts that have made record bets against stocks?

As contrarily bullish as some of the above charts may seem, I happen to think
that we are closer to a 10% correction than to a notable short covering rally.
Moreover, I also think that that the blowups will outnumber the bailouts in
the months ahead. In other words, while hedge fund redemption season and the
actions of short sellers are two potentially big events worth talking about,
remember that this market is being controlled by unknown and volatile forces,
at least over the near term.
Incidentally, why all the fuss about an S&500 that has not even reached
a 7% decline (or the intraday loss the S&P 500 recorded in a
single session back in April 2000)? Did I mention the S&P 500 ended
less than 1-point below its 200 DMA yesterday?
|