|
The current economic debate really boils down to one essential question: "Will
there be a recession?" To me, the question has about as much vitality as debating
whether Roger Clemens will be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame. (With
over 300 wins and more strikeouts than any other pitcher besides Nolan Ryan,
the Rocket is a sure thing for Cooperstown). Similarly, a recession is not
a question of "if" but merely of "when".
Most on Wall Street believe that a recession is unlikely because U.S. consumers
can maintain their current spending levels. Given that vanishing home equity
and escalating mortgage payments are now an undisputed fact, this faith rests
on the belief that Americans will be able to go deeper into debt. However,
the recent credit market contraction is a clear indication that those doing
the lending are not signing on to the program, and that America's spending
spree is over.
After years of easy credit, many on Wall Street simply can't conceive of a
world in which credit is not available to anyone at any price. They do not
understand that our current problems are the result of Americans having spent
too much and now not being able to repay the money they borrowed to do so.
The sooner Americans increase their savings by restraining their spending,
the sooner we can begin to put our economic house back in order. The fact that
such a shift will create a recession is unfortunate. Nevertheless it is necessary
and inevitable.
Some high profile individuals have managed to put two and two together. This
week in an interview on CNBC, Angelo Mozilo, CEO of beleaguered Countrywide
Financial, connected the dots when he forecast a recession. The well-bronzed
mortgage giant told Maria Bartiromo, "I can't believe that when you're having
a level of delinquencies, foreclosures -- equity has disappeared, equity is
gone, the tide has gone out -- that this doesn't have a material effect, A,
on the psyches of the American people, and eventually on their wallet."
Others, including Ben Bernanke, claim to need more economic data before reaching
a conclusion as to the fate of the economy. This is like waiting for the ship
to fully submerge before admitting that there is a leak. To their credit however,
the Fed has indicated that the overall effects of a recession can be healthy
for the long term economy. However, from Wall Street's perspective, any recession
is immediately toxic as it will lead to lower earnings for the financial sector.
Interestingly, many of the financial luminaries sounding the loudest alarms
are proposing solutions that will only make the situation worse.
In order to breathe life into the dying secondary market for non-conforming
mortgages, some have suggested that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac be allowed to
buy jumbo mortgages. This overlooks the problem that many of these larger mortgages
also feature adjustable rates that will likely show greater default levels
when payments reset higher. Allowing Fannie and Freddie to buy larger loans
now merely sets up a more expensive Federal bailout down the road, as both
of these entities themselves will likely need to be bailed out when the conforming
ARMs they already insure go bad as well.
Others, such as bond guru Bill Gross, have suggested that the Federal government
itself establish a fund to bail out homeowners who can not afford their mortgages.
Gross maintains that such a move would be necessary to prevent the biggest
real estate price collapse since the Great Depression. If he truly harbors
such fears, then he should know that creating such a fund will not prevent
the disaster. Even if it means that millions of foreclosures do not occur,
real estate prices will still have to fall substantially to return to normal
levels and to be in conformity with traditional lending standards.
Setting aside the constitutional or ethical arguments against it, the cost
of such a bail out would be staggering. My guess is that the price tag would
exceed one trillion dollars (Gross estimates the cost at only around $200 billion).
Even if Gross' numbers are accurate, it still represents a significant sum
which we would likely have to borrow from abroad. What Gross fails to consider
is the moral hazard implicit in such a bail out. Were the government to create
a program whereby anyone falling behind on their mortgage could have their
loan restructured to some lesser amount with lower payments, one would have
to be an idiot not to take advantage of it. If such a nutty plan were ever
implemented, it would not be 2 million homes going into foreclosure as Gross
fears, but 20 million.
For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy
and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book "Crash Proof: How
to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click
here to order a copy today.
More importantly take action to protect your wealth and preserve your purchasing
power before it's too late. Discover the best way to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|