|
The recent and tragic bridge collapse in Minnesota raises many questions in
Americans' minds about our aging infrastructure, and what is being done to
maintain it. Questions such as: "Was I-35 an isolated accident or are we approaching
days when crumbling bridges and bursting pipes will be regular features on
the evening news?"
The poor ratings on the inspection report of that bridge, and similar deficiency
findings on as many as 25% of our bridges suggests the latter. Estimates on
what it will cost to bring deficiencies in our infrastructure back up to par
range from massive to astronomical.
Billions of tax dollars at all levels of government are devoted to infrastructure,
but one problem is that politicians love to cut ribbons. Political capital
is gained not from maintaining or repairing our systems, but from building
new bridges, new stadiums, and new roads, often of questionable real utility.
Seldom is there a ceremony or photo opportunity for repairing or maintaining
something already in place.
As the so-called Highway Trust Fund is set to go bankrupt as early as 2009,
private investment firms are gearing up for partnerships, which could be a
positive step, if handled sensibly. What we need to avoid are items such as
the Trans Texas Corridor (TTC), which is phase 1 of the NAFTA Super Highway.
The Spanish firm Cintra is set to take over toll collections after the TTC's
completion, however it is unclear that they'll have any obligations for maintenance.
The cost is being socialized, while the profit is privatized, effectively making
the American people pay for it twice.
Infrastructure, in a capitalist model, is an asset worthy of maintaining to
ensure continuity of revenue. In a government controlled model infrastructure
is nothing but a cumbersome liability. This should be taken into consideration
when developing plans to keep our current infrastructure safe. Privatization
should be used to encourage maintenance and safety, and where private companies
truly invest and bear the upfront costs in return for ability to collect tolls
or usage fees in some form. But public/private partnerships that look more
like corporate welfare must be avoided.
We should re-examine how we handle the taxes we collect for infrastructure
and how we allocate that money. At the very least reins need to be put on the
Highway Trust Fund. Funds collected from the gas tax should go into the Trust
Fund-- period.
Even the most ardent liberal and passionate conservative can agree that when
they pay gasoline taxes, the least they expect is a road and bridge system
that won't crumble beneath their feet. Before any subsidies or welfare payments
are paid out, before social security is handed out to illegal immigrants, or
health care is given to everyone, before bridges to nowhere are built at home,
or entire countries bombed and rebuilt abroad, before any other myriad of exotic
government projects are even considered, infrastructure should be attended
to and taken seriously.
|