|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
23rd September 2007.
The reason we expected the Fed to cut its targeted interest rate by 0.25%,
rather than the 0.50% that it actually decided upon, was the potential for
a 0.50% cut to precipitate the events that we have seen over the past four
trading days: upside breakouts in key commodities (gold and oil) and a sell-off
in the Treasury market. Bernanke and Co. were obviously under a lot of pressure
to do something to create some liquidity in the debt market, but by moving
so forcefully at the beginning of their rate-cutting campaign they have re-kindled
some inflation fires without actually doing much to help the sectors of the
economy that are in crisis mode.
In fact, they may have created even bigger problems for the housing sector
and the mortgage-related debt market -- the two parts of the financial world
that are hurting the most at this time. This is because their aggressive reduction
in the overnight lending rate has caused LONG-TERM interest rates to move HIGHER
due to rising inflation expectations, thus potentially making things MORE difficult
for a lot of mortgagors and the banks/investors that own huge piles of mortgage-related
debt. Furthermore, due to the heightened inflation fears -- or heightened inflation-related
enthusiasm, as the case may be -- fueled by their "shock and awe" tactics the
Feds now have a lot less flexibility. In particular, they will find it almost
impossible to make another cut in the near future in response to a worsening
of the debt crisis if the gold price keeps pushing upward and the Treasury
market keeps sinking.
This past week's events have constituted a marked deviation from the 1998
pattern we've discussed in recent commentaries. Specifically, in September
of 1998 the Fed began its campaign with a 0.25% cut and the financial world's
immediate response was "that's not enough!" And in September of 1998 the Treasury
market was rocketing upward (bond yields were plummeting), giving the Fed the
freedom to make whatever rate cuts it deemed necessary to restore liquidity
to the debt market. However, when the Fed opened its most recent rate-cutting
campaign with a larger-than-expected 0.50% move the financial world's immediate
response was "the Fed is going to inflate the dollar into oblivion!" This was
the correct response, although the dollar will not be traveling solo along
the road to oblivion because the ECB, the Bank of England and all the other
central banks of the world are already taking, or will soon be taking, similar
steps.
Fortunately for the Fed, the gold price is very overbought on a short-term
basis and the oil market is now close to its seasonal peak. As a result, the
gold price is likely to pull back over the coming weeks and the oil price could
be near an intermediate-term peak. Also, the stock market looks set to decline
over the next few weeks. We say "fortunately" because if these things happen
then inflation fears should subside, at least momentarily, thus allowing the
bond market to rebound and providing much-needed cover for the Fed to make
another cut in its targeted short-term interest rate. There is obviously a
risk, though, that the markets will 'turn the screws' on the Fed by continuing
to push relentlessly in their current directions. If this happens then Bernanke
and his cohorts may want to retract their recent interest rate changes, but
will they be able to do so if, in the interim, the debt/housing crisis has
become worse?
This is the sort of dilemma a government price fixer will always end up facing,
and deservedly so.
|