|
When you build a puzzle do you dump out 1000 pieces and randomly try to put
together the picture, or do you look for the obvious corners, flat borders,
build the frame and then fill in the details? So why do investors try to match
a million random pieces of information in an attempt to try to build a clear
picture?
There is a lot of misleading information in the world of economics and investing.
With all of the varied components, such as flawed theories and strategies,
potential conflict of interest among advisers, potential conflict of interest
within government, various opinions, countless indicators and different interpretations
of them etc., it can be very difficult to see the forest through the trees.
But in our opinion some things are much easier to understand and interpret
than others. It is this understanding that helps us focus on our simple investment
strategy in order to try and outperform the markets with more consistent, profitable
trades.
In our opinion some of the very complex elements of investing are just too
difficult to predict. For example, how good have economists been at predicting
when the US consumer will be "tapped out"? How many times have you heard that
prediction made inaccurately? If we based our investment decisions solely on
a complex indicator such as US consumer spending, I think we would be broke.
But doesn't a good investor have to untangle and make sense of the web of
data, indicators and press releases to be successful? Isn't this the only way?
We believe following various indicators can help confirm or not confirm our
position but we do not try to sift through thousands of moving parts to draw
our conclusion. Instead, we make a hypothesis based on some obvious signals
and work backwards. Let us explain.
We believe the world is so fixated on looking at the same indicators, and
trying to follow each others actions that they get lost trying to interpret
those signals. How can everyone follow the same news stories, standard indicators
and strategies and then expect to outperform the competing investors who are
doing the same things? For example, if every investor is watching what the
Federal Reserve will do with interest rates on Tuesday September 18, 2007 as
their unique insight to the market, how does that help anyone get ahead?
A handful of years ago we could not tell you when housing prices would fall,
when oil would hit $80 per barrel or higher, when the US dollar would break
below 0.80, when the Canadian dollar would hit parity with the US dollar, when
silver would hit $13 and so on. What we could tell you is this:
Based on historical records, relative to other investments such as the
US stock market, Precious Metals Investments were highly undervalued.

(We will explain more on the above chart in a moment.)
In our opinion this was all we had to know and from there we worked backwards
to confirm or deny our hypothesis. From this starting point, every piece of
data or news became an opportunity to confirm or challenge our investment decision.
You may be wondering; how did we determine Precious Metals were undervalued
relative to other investments? Think of it this way. Is a dollar a good measure
of your investments? We know that a dollar is regularly losing purchasing power
over time. For example, since 1970 each US dollar will buy a smaller house,
less gas for a car, less labor from an employee, less food, less entertainment,
less energy for your home etc. Therefore we think a dollar is a poor measuring
stick for our investments. We are more interested in knowing how much of one
investment we can buy with the proceeds of another investment. In other words,
we compare investments directly to one another, such as how much Dow Jones
will my Silver buy.
The above chart is a custom built long term chart comparing precious metals
such as silver and gold directly to US stocks. There are two important elements
of this chart:
-
Relative Value: When the blue line is near the top of the chart
in the red area with a score near the +10 level, it would take a smaller
quantity of precious metals to buy a larger quantity of stocks and therefore
it would be wise to sell some metal to buy some stocks. When the blue line
is in the lower green portion of the chart with a score near +1 it would
be wise to sell some stocks and buy some precious metals. As you can see
from the grey line, the price of silver was very expensive in 1980 and
relatively speaking very inexpensive in around 2000.
-
Trend: This chart also helps us visually see if metals appear to
be gaining in value relative to stocks (eg. Blue line trending up 1971
- 1980), or stocks appear to be gaining in value relative to precious metals
(eg. Blue line trending down 1980 - 2000).
As you can see, since 2000 it appears that precious metals have been aggressively
heading higher relative to US stock markets. It also appears the trend is well
in place and precious metals still seem to be undervalued to stocks when we
compare a historical measure such as 1980. Also notice that the blue line was
much higher in 1980 and like a pendulum swinging we expect the blue line to
reach a level similar to this height again. Therefore this chart is very useful
in helping us determine not only when to add to our metal investments, but
also how aggressively we may wish to do so and when we should exit our positions.
So now that we have determined that silver and gold may be undervalued relative
to other investment options, we filter and interpret other indicators differently
than had we not noticed this major development. The popular media, Wall Street,
US government etc. may not want you to sell your US dollar denominated investments
such as US stocks in order to buy precious metals. These institutions may promote
stocks, incorrectly justify what is happening with inflation, volatility, liquidity,
interest rates etc. and confuse the public about their investment decisions
because they may have a vested interest to do so. But some things are just
too hard to hide. It is hard to hide the fact that back in 2000 it took far
less stocks to buy a large amount of precious metals. At that time precious
metals were obviously undervalued relative to stocks.
With this theory we now have the foundation for our belief. We then use indicators
such as supply and demand, rising consumer prices, rising oil prices etc. to
help confirm or challenge our belief. We can not tell you exactly when the
US dollar will head lower or when the Dow Jones will correct in nominal value
but we can tell you that we expect those things to happen. We believe this
will help verify our hypothesis that silver and gold are undervalued relative
to the general stock market.
Basically we believe most people try to make sense out of an inundating amount
of different signals to decide what to do with their investments. In the process
we think they become lost and misled by the overwhelming amount of random information
available for consideration at different times. Instead, we look for the simplest,
most obvious signs to decide what to do with our investments, and then we further
filter through the host of different signals to confirm or challenge our decision.
We find this process very effective in keeping our investment decisions less
emotional and more profitable.
If you would like to learn more about our system and view updated versions
of the chart above, we invite you to visit our website at www.investmentscore.com.
|