|
In response to Is
the Fed Deflating? I received several reader question similar to this
one from Mike:
Thank you for your analysis. Could you please tell me, and others, what
we should do to protect ourselves per your warning below?
"Those who ignore the warnings are likely to drown."
Sincerely,
Mike
Thanks for the question Mike. It's a good question and not often discussed
enough. Let's add two more words to the very end of the above warning then
see if we can answer your question: "Those who ignore the warnings are likely
to drown in debt."
The best way to avoid drowning in debt is to not get into debt in the first
place. Those who are in debt should attempt to get out of it as quick as they
can. The way to do this is simple: Live within your means or better yet live
below your means.
Those who carry credit card balances from month to month are not living within
their means. Far too many people treated their house as an ATM, taking out
cash to pay off credit cards, only to run up credit card or auto loan debt
time after time. The housing ATM is now shutoff but consumers keep buying more
than they can afford. The result is that credit card debt is soaring once again.
The number one rule in all of this is:
Don't Buy Stuff You Cannot Afford

Click here to see one of the funniest Saturday
Night Live skits ever.
In this tenuous jobs market (see Moonbats
Active Again in Massive Jobs Disaster), one needs to be prepared for
the loss of a job. It can happen at anytime in any industry. The housing
spillover has just started. It is highly likely the financial sector will
continue to get hit. A downturn in commercial real estate and retail appears
to be starting.
The Wall Street Journal reported Durable
goods orders declined 4.9%. Target and Lowe's both warned. See Target
Warns and Blames Florida - Lowes Blames Dry Weather.
Just as the housing problem spread from subprime to Alt-A to prime, job losses
are highly likely to spread from housing, to commercial real estate, to retail.
To protect oneself from a loss of income, it is imperative to have actual cash
savings in a money market, short term treasuries, or short term CDs. Those
barely able to make home payments now and who have no cash savings, will be
in serious jeopardy if they lose a job. Don't be one of them.
Have a Years' Worth of Living Expenses in Cash
Before thinking about vacations, new cars, or even investing, I would recommend
for people to have 12 months of living expenses in cash, short term CDs, or
short term treasuries. Those who say "cash is trash" have never lost a job
for an extended period of time.
I have and I know what it's like.
Consider a decision to have "emergency cash on hand" as sound financial planning
and as an additional means test on purchases as well. Can you really afford
an expensive vacation, a boat, or a new car if such purchases would deplete
your savings leaving nothing for emergencies like the loss of a job?
Buy Food On Sale
Food prices seem to be soaring. Get an electrically efficient freezer and
buy what's on sale. Food can easily last three to six months or longer, if
properly wrapped in plastic and/or freezer paper. My parents did this. Mom
would buy what was on sale, dad would wrap it in freezer wrap and label and
date the package. It seems to be a lost art.
Even as non-sale prices seem to be rising, sale prices on meat (the largest
part of our food budget by far), have hardly budged for six years. I routinely
get center cut pork chops for $2.49 or so but the regular price is now often
$4.49 or higher. Whole chickens, vacuum sealed so they don't even have to be
wrapped can be purchased on sale for .49 lb. or so. I wonder how they can raise
them for that price.
Last week I bought round steak for $1.49 lb. Round steak was a loss leader
at .99 lb when I worked in a grocery store in 1971. That's hardly any inflation
in over 30 years! Many stores will grind meat for free. Why pay $3.98 lb for
ground round when you can pick up a round steak for $1.49 and have the butcher
grind it for free? It's the same thing with ground chuck. Besides, you also
know exactly what you are getting that way as opposed to buying a package of
ground beef wondering "what the heck is in this and how fresh is it?"
Prime rib on sale is $4.99 lb not on sale is $10 lb. A 20 oz bottle of White
Rain shampoo is .99. If you buy the advertised name brand shampoo it will cost
over 5 times a much and it won't clean your hair any better.
If you can't afford to eat out, then don't. Even if you can afford to eat
out there is nothing wrong with cutting back on the frequency and saving for
a rainy day.
Consider Wants vs. Needs vs. Affordability
Do you really need an SUV? Can you afford one? What about the cost
of filling it up? Auto sales persons, real estate agents, and in fact nearly
every sales person's job is to convince you that what you are looking at is affordable.
If one has to stretch a car payment out to 5 years to be able to "afford" it,
the car is simply not affordable in my book. But even if the car is affordable
what about the increase in auto insurance? The salesperson is 100% guaranteed
not to mention it.
Cars, trucks, and boats are depreciating assets. If they are depreciating
faster than you are able to paying off the loan, then they are not really affordable.
It's best to pay cash for such items. But if you can't do that, at least make
sure you are not upside down in the loan a few years down the road.
Interest only loans and teaser rates on houses do not make houses affordable
either. Many are finding that out the hard way right now. Perhaps the sales
agent forgot to point out escalating association dues, hurricane insurance
costs, property tax, and heating bills when considering "affordability".
Reduce Leverage
Paying down mortgage debt is a reduction in leverage. It's a good idea. In
contrast, some financial advisors are recommending that people take out home
equity loans and buy stocks. This advice is based on the premise that the stock
market always goes up over time. The current advice is to Aim
High. I disagree.
Didn't we just hear the same thing about home prices?
At 20% down homes are already highly leveraged. Increasing leverage for the
purpose of investing stands a good chance of losing twice. All it takes is
a continued decline in home prices and another bear market in equities. Both
are likely. Risk is a two way street. It is not always rewarded. Leveraging
up and throwing the rest into stocks is simply poor financial advice no matter
how it turns out.
Stock prices and housing prices fell for 18 years in Japan. The same can happen
here. I'm not saying they will, I am saying they can. There certainly have
been many 10-20 year periods where stocks went down to sideways. It's a huge
mistake to judge things from the recent bull market.
Consider Retirement Plans
The closer one is to retirement the more risk avoidance is likely to come
into play. The key here is to understand your timeline as well as your risk
tolerance. Someone five years from retirement does not have ten years or longer
to break even if the market takes another slump. Someone in the S&P and
holding from 2000 is just now back to even.
Look at LBOs now being balked at by Citigroup (C), Lehman (LEH), Merrill Lynch
(MER), Goldman Sachs (GS), and Bear Stearns (BSC). As long as they could securitize
the debt they were fine in pumping it. Buyout Bingo has now stopped. If Citigroup
does not want the debt or the deals why should anyone else?
One of the reasons that earnings have been high is underwriters were able
to pass the CDO and mortgage trash to pension plans and foreign investors,
collecting enormous fees along the way. Another reason was that people continued
to buy stuff they could not afford, primarily on the belief that home prices
would continue rising.
Investors needs to understand how the credit binge affected earnings as well
as the likelihood that the credit binge grinds to a halt. Traders have no such
considerations.
No one really knows for sure if stocks are going to drop or not drop, but
they certainly are nowhere near as cheap as most make them out to be. Historically
stock market returns with this backdrop have been weak to poor. Is this time
likely to be any different?
Bear markets have a way of exposing fraud and all sorts of other problems.
One look at housing should be proof enough. The stock market is not immune
either. Risk has increased and one should factor that risk assessment into
investment decisions.
Challenge Traditional Thinking
The past several years have been rather amazing. Nearly every asset class
around the globe rose in unison. This is not normal market behavior. What was
correlated on the way up can easily be correlated on the way down. In that
regard, diversification does not guarantee success nor does traditional
thinking.
Traditional thinking still boils down to a recommendation of buying a mix
of stocks and bonds (with bonds specifically meaning corporate bonds).
Unfortunately there is no magic formula that can properly allocate stocks and
bonds in a portfolio by a person's age as some attempt to do. And if the economy
is headed into an economic slowdown, default risk will rise and corporate bonds
(especially junk bonds) are likely to be punished.
In general, corporate bond spreads are simply too low vs. treasury yields
to make them a good buy at this juncture. But that has not stopped advisors
from recommending them.
There are ways to hedge stocks but those ways are seldom mentioned by advisors.
And there is nothing at all wrong with seeing increased risk and pulling some
chips off the table. There are also currencies, commodities, and precious metals
to consider.
Advice on all these issues has to be given individually and that advice also
needs to consider the goals, risk tolerances, and timelines of the investor
as well. That is what we do at Sitka
Pacific Capital Management.
|