|
Originally published by www.focuspointpress.com on
August 10, 2007
When James C. Coley II, Chairman and CEO of strategic private equity investor
Proctor Investment Managers, founded the company in January 2006 with its President,
Mona Aboelnaga Kanaan, they wanted to evolve the emerging manager concept in
a new direction.
Now just a little over 1 1/2 years later Proctor Investment Managers, or Proctor
IM as Coley refers to their company, has seven affiliated firms managing over
$8 billion in assets. Suffice to say, they have come a long way in a short
time since they first formed the group in a management lift-out from Overture
Asset Managers, a traditional asset management holding company.
Proctor IM is a strategic buyer of alternative and traditional asset managers
with a hybrid business model. On one hand, by investing in the capital structure
of underlying managers they are effectively a private equity group; simultaneously
Proctor IM provides sales and marketing capabilities to these same asset managers. "That
alone makes us relatively unique," says Coley, "there are very few if hardly
any firms right now that have this kind of dual focus."
In addition, Proctor IM tends to focus on smaller asset managers. "We define
emerging managers as those that typically have under $2.5 billion assets under
management," explains Coley. "Those firms typically benefit most from our business
model in the sense that they haven't built out a large marketing infrastructure,
and therefore they can leverage their product through our sales organization."
At the same time Proctor IM seeks managers with institutional potential as
well as a differentiated investment approach. "To be another fixed income or
large-cap core manager is not going to cut it for us. We need something differentiated
in the investment process," said Coley.
The business dynamics in the industry has also substantially changed since
late 2002 when Coley and Kanaan ran the operations of Proctor IM's predecessor,
Overture. Initially they thought working with hedge funds would be a great
opportunity, but at the time alternative investments were generally outperforming
traditional managers on an absolute basis because of the 2001-2002 bear market.
Consequently, firms at the time were less willing to sell an equity stake in
their operations. As Kanaan explained, "the environment at that time was quite
conducive for asset gathering in the hedge fund industry."
This is not the situation now with low cost beta strategies doing well. "In
the last few years hedge funds have experienced for the most part a lot of
cyclical type of performance returns," according to Coley, who was also CEO
of Overture. It is "very hard to differentiate themselves, hard to get product
traction. That really wasn't the case back in 2002."
Proctor IM believes that the business model for alternative managers is following
in the same footsteps forged by traditional managers from prior generations. "The
industry is going through a maturing process, including the need for infrastructure,
for management processes, and the growing need for distribution as well as
manufacturing of product," said Kanaan.
"It has been a difficult environment for everybody, outside maybe the largest
firms. Again if you go back to our targeted firm size, under $2.5 billion,
those guys are having a real difficult time getting their message out in the
marketplace," added Coley. "Things that are important to the institutional
channel -- for instance, consultants, marketing support and personnel -- we
can really help on that; both from our capital investment helping affiliates
gain scale and add infrastructure, and secondly in the sales and marketing
that we bring to bear."
The foundation for Proctor IM's business is based on what Coley and
Kanaan forged with Overture. However, the asset manager aggregator model has
been around for quite a while and includes the likes of United Asset Management,
which was sold to Old Mutual Plc, and Affiliated Managers Group, a public company
since 1997.
Rosemont Investment Partners, which focuses exclusively on making investments
in asset managers who face an ownership dilemma, and Lovell Minnick, which
provides buyout and growth capital to developing companies in the financial
services industry, are considered competitors of Proctor IM. Another player
is Asset Management Finance, led by Norton Reamer the founder of United Asset
Management. His company offers a patent-pending structure that provides up-front
capital in exchange for an expiring interest in an asset manager's future gross
revenues. Interestingly, several of these firms, including Proctor IM, are
backed by the some of the same banks.
As Coley stated, "the business model is going through an evolution," which
is to be expected. In response, Proctor IM looks at the various aspects of
firms such as Neuberger Berman, Affiliated Managers Group, Nvest Companies
and Legg Mason and borrows what it considers best practices.
Proctor IM's value added to its affiliates is broader than just financing
and distribution. Once they engage with an asset manager, the entire management
team goes through an extensive process in which sales is just one part of the
equation. Making sure the messaging is correct, working on the presentation,
contact management administration and client servicing all play into the rollout
strategy, which includes public relations. These are all important and relevant
steps prior to the blocking and tackling of the actual sales process and facilitating
investors through the pipeline.
"It's everything you want from a firm if you want to do it in-house. We customize
for each asset manager depending on how much they have internally that they
want to do, versus what they would rather us work on for them," says Coley. "Each
firm has different needs."
To date Proctor IM has partnered with a variety of asset managers. These include
Aletheia Research and Management, a $6 billion large-cap manager; Atlantic
Capital Management, a traditional growth manager with $668 million in assets;
Avatar Associate which manages $1.2 billion in a quantitative tactical asset
allocation strategy; Boyar Asset Management, a $565 million deep value intrinsic
manager; and Drake Asset Management, a long-short global equity hedge fund
with $189 million in assets. Additionally, Proctor IM has stakes in Explorer
Alternative Management and just negotiated a deal with Conquest
Capital Group (see links for articles on these two affiliates).
"The reason we do this is that from a sales perspective, getting through the
clutter of calls with the consultants and institutional clients, it is important
for us to have something we can get across very quickly and in a succinct message,
if there is a fit," Coley says.
This also plays into why Proctor IM is seeking to put together a stable of
asset managers that it considers differentiated and complementary. As can be
seen, Proctor IM is building relationships which incorporate both alternative
and traditional investment managers under its umbrella.
Proctor IM does not provide consolidation of backoffice operations, however.
According to Coley, "At one time at Overture we thought that would be part
of our business strategy. But what we ultimately found is that unless all the
firms are located in the same geography, which we don't insist on, backoffice
consolidation can be difficult."
Coley goes on to say, "More importantly that is a business of tremendous scale.
There are just a whole host of people that can do a better job than we ever
could do." In view of that, Proctor IM will help their affiliates, who make
their own decisions ultimately, outsource to selected vendors with preferential
pricing, whether it be performance reporting or legal services.
A key and early on strategic decision that immediately increased the
pipeline for potential private equity transactions was expanding Proctor IMs
business model to allow for minority stakes. As Coley explained, "It really
opened up the opportunity set, particularly on the alternative side. We won't
say that we won't do a majority stake but we don't insist on it anymore."
"Asset management is a great business to be in -- great for growth, high margins,
certainly smart people, empowerment. But you have to recognize the uniqueness
of this industry. We do not believe that you can treat it similarly to other
industries that have been quite well invested with private equity capital," Kanaan
says.
Accordingly, the way Proctor IM sources and structures their deals is specialized
to the industry. "You have to be cognizant of the fact that this is very much
a people business; you have to structure deals in true partnership fashion," explains
Kanaan. For that reason Proctor IM cedes the day-to-day decision making with
the asset management team. Proctor IM is, however, a partner with a direct
stake in the capital structure, and therefore maintains a seat on the board
with direct involvement in the strategic direction of their affiliate asset
managers.
In seeking to identify complimentary rather than competing investment strategies,
Proctor IM leverages their network in an effort to find promising managers.
They also receive regular inquiries. "We are certainly eager to increase the
number of deals beyond were it is today," says Kanaan. "When managers are at
that boutique stage, which we think is anywhere from $100 million to $2.5 billion,
Proctor IM provides an opportunity for these asset managers to supercharge
their growth without necessarily having to grow the infrastructure all themselves."
According to Kanaan, Proctor IM has an integrated approach for looking at
deals from a private equity perspective -- making sure that deals are a valid
and attractive investment, as well as making sure the products are marketable
to the different distribution channels. Key to this process is Proctor IM's
management team of fourteen professionals of which eleven are dedicated to
sales and marketing. Their combined knowledge of the various institutional
channels and investment requirements improves the vetting process of prospective
asset manager deals.
Proctor IM doesn't have that many hard boxes to check. What is most important
is the credibility of the people and whether or not the business is institutional
because that is the marketplace they are completely focused on. If the business
is not run properly or if there is no defined investment process, then it is
probably not a good fit for Proctor IM.
"We try to look at the way they managed their money, their business management.
We don't do it based on timing or chasing trends. Like a private equity deal,
it is based on backing a team," says Kanaan. "What ultimately makes Proctor
IM unique is the differentiation between the affiliate asset managers we are
aggregating, their individual stories, and what they are doing."
In order to finance these transactions, Proctor IM got their working capital
to build the business out and purchase investment companies from a subsidiary
of National Bank of Canada.
"It is a long process to build one of these businesses from scratch. As you
can imagine there are a lot of moving parts." According to Coley, "The economics
of the business is, such that till you realize, if you ever realize, a property
in your portfolio, that the cash flow is really determined off the distribution
economics of the partnership."
The business itself creates a conundrum. "You can't get product without sales
people, and you can't get sales people without product," says Coley. "There
are several business drivers, and partnerships can take years before they get
very profitable."
The asset management industry has developed considerably since the
turn of the century, not to mention how quickly alternative investments have
grown since the early 1990s. This has not happened, though, without a fair
share of concerns materializing.
There is currently an ongoing debate that, as hedge funds become more institutionalized
and crowded alpha is getting squeezed, and in line with the efficient market
hypothesis, evolving into leveraged or exotic betas. "It is very hard to find
in the current market environment significant alpha producers," says Coley.
He thinks, however, this is totally related to volatility. "All we have to
do is wait for one of these fat tail events."
"I am absolutely convinced that the industry is going through a major monumental
change in that it is following exactly what happened in the long-only space,
and that is because volatility is falling," explains Coely. "I don't think
it is because people are less skilled. When volatility gets compressed and
it stays relatively low, skill becomes hard to see. If the market where ever
to return to normalized volatility, which some day I'm sure it will, then the
band between someone who is very good versus someone who is not so good will
open up and you will have 'alpha' again."
Proctor IM is well-positioned to identify upcoming talent through an affiliate
called Explorer
Asset Management, which was spun out of Circle T Partners. Explorer offers
a multi-strategy product that invests with hedge funds vis-à-vis sub-advisory
agreements though a managed account platform. The fund clears through a single
prime broker and the main advantage of this structure is that it provides both
liquidity and transparency into the trading.
As can be imagined, Explorer creates a watch list of managers Proctor IM might
want to get to know better, but are a little too early in the curve to meet
its direct investment parameters. "It is a very unique product for institutions
and consultants looking for a first foray into hedge funds, but don't want
to have the illiquidity or more importantly the lack of transparency," says
Coley.
In another recently inked deal, Proctor IM acquired an equity interest in Conquest
Capital Group, a managed futures shop based in New York. Conquest has
done research which defines beta in the sub-sector as the opportunity set
of "all the trades" in managed futures. Then through a quantitative model
they replicated the trading, which provides a relatively high degree of correlation
to the beta of that opportunity set. Proctor IM recognized that Conquest's
process of creating 'beta' can actually be carried from, not just managed
futures, but to other strategies.
"Go back a couple of decades ago to the evolution of index products and ultimately
index plus. What that did was basically revolutionize the asset management
business," says Coley. "It comes to separating who are really beta managers
and who really are alpha managers."
Coley's view on alpha and volatility is only a prelude to his main thesis. "Problem
has been, as I said earlier, in defining beta," making his point. "So once
the industry has come to a real definition of beta, which in my opinion will
come through products as opposed to some research breakthrough, investors are
going to begin to demand [such products] like they did in the long only space.
'I am only going to pay for beta or exotic beta, but if you provide alpha I
will pay 2 and 20.'"
"If you are really going to provide 'beta' than you better provide beta and
hug a bunch of markets or benchmarks returns, and for a very low fee. And if
you are truly going to be an alpha manager then we now have ways to measure
that and we are willing to pay for it. And I think that is what is going to
happen to the hedge fund world," Coley concludes.
For Kanaan, however, the business philosophy is rather straight forward, "If
these managers are worth placing money with to manage, why not invest in the
asset management business itself."
This article was written by Michael "Mack" Frankfurter and first
published by Focus Point Press, Inc. (Emerging
Manager Focus) under the title "A Lift Out Legacy Gives Proctor Business Acumen
when Selecting Viable Managers." It is republished here by permission.
|