|
"The damned government has now ruined the money so badly that the little
bit of metal in the old coins is now worth more than the face value of the
coin, but the government can't wiggle out of paying for their sins by letting
people not pay...taxes!"
JMR Arlo S. was cheery as he sent a link to Rense.com, whereupon one learns
that somebody has figured out how to beat the inflationary destruction of the
money by the actions and inactions by the Lying, Cheating Government (LCG)
and the Lying, Cheating Federal Reserve (LCFR): Use
old coins!
The headline was, "IRS Suffers Staggering Defeat". In short, the guy paid
his employees with old silver dimes, silver dollars and old
gold U.S. coins according to their face value. Thus, he could pay his workers
with silver dimes, silver quarters, silver dollars and gold coins, and thus
the employee made so little money (according to the face value of the coins)
that they fell below minimum income reporting thresholds, and thus no income
tax was due.
Mr. Rense explains, "In other words, if a worker is paid with such coins,
his taxable 'income' (if any) can only be the face value indicated upon the
coin money paid - i.e., $1.00 for a circulating silver dollar or $50 for a
circulating gold U.S. coin."
The government, on the other hand, argued that the market value of those coins
made them very valuable, and thus the employees owed taxes on the true value
of their coins, not the paltry pittance of the face value. The IRS argued that, "Obviously,
a $20 coin made of gold is worth at least $750, which is the
market price of gold!"
So, "The essence of the argument is that under the Constitution, Congress
is obligated by law to mint and circulate such coins as demand requires, and
must establish the value of coins as they are used as legal tender, but the
coins' market value, arising as valuable personal 'property,' is a distinct,
separate attribute of such coins, and is of no legal consequence if the coins
are used as legal tender." Hahaha! Fabulous!
The first Supreme Court argument underpinning the defendant's case was Ling
Su Fan v. U.S. in 1910, which "establishes the legal distinction of a coin
bearing the 'impress' of the sovereign: 'These limitations are due to the fact
that public law gives to such coinage a value which does not attach as a mere
consequence of intrinsic value. Their quality as a legal tender is an attribute
of law aside from their bullion value. They bear, therefore, the impress of
sovereign power which fixes value and authorizes their use in exchange.'"
If that was not enough, the second pillar of the defendant's argument is Thompson
v. Butler from 1877, which, "establishes that the law makes no legal distinction
between the values of coin and paper money used as legal tender: A coin dollar
is worth no more for the purposes of tender in payment of an ordinary debt
than a note dollar. The law has not made the note a standard of value any more
than coin. It is true that in the market, as an article of merchandise, one
is of greater value than the other; but as money, that is to say, as a medium
of exchange, the law knows no difference between them."
Hahaha! The damned government has now ruined
the money so badly that the little bit of metal in the old coins is now
worth more than the face value of the coin, but the government can't wiggle
out of paying for their sins by letting people not pay confiscatory income
taxes! The government and the IRS are required to honor the face value of
the coins! This is too, too fabulous!
But the most interesting part, mostly because I love to read it over and over,
comes at the end, where we are reminded that "In 2005, the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals refused to overturn a previous District Court ruling holding that
the federal prosecutor is not entitled to absolute immunity for the unlawful
raid."
Therefore, "In March 2007, the primary defendant, Bob Kahre, filed a federal
civil rights lawsuit against the prosecutor and IRS agents who had conducted
what he alleges to be an unlawful search and seizure raid"! Hahaha! Go get
'em, Bob!
Okay, that is old news, but still somehow comforting to know that I can use
this as a club to beat the hell out of any public employee who does me harm
without the legal authority to do so.
Mr. Rense is not interested in my reveling in the happy prospect of suing
rambunctious government employees and retiring in luxury on the settlement,
and says that the cover-up is the real story, as he reports that, "To this
day, with exception of the single article by the Review Journal, no major media
entity has published a news story regarding the outcome of this important federal
criminal tax case."
And little wonder, eh? Since when were the news media and the school system
NOT a couple of whores for the government? Hahahaha! Ugh.
Mogambo sez: I figure that the insiders, who are massively short, are
colluding to manipulate the prices
of gold, silver and oil down, only to let them rise, so that they can profit,
not just with bets covering the guaranteed inflationary rise in prices thanks
to central banks dangerously expanding the money supplies, but also on spread
bets in the futures markets as they make the spreads widen and narrow.
You know they have to do it, you know they want to do it, you know that they
are doing it, so you know it's coming, and so you know you can make money trading
them as they reach extremes in the trend, or just constantly buying at the
low prices after the manipulated pullbacks. What a wonderful world!
P.S. To get The Daily Reckoning sent directly to your
inbox, sign up for our
free email newsletter, or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily
Reckoning RSS feed.
|