|
Besides
ETFs, the United States is one of the world's leading producers of beef. But
the industry has not been without its share of difficulties, including numerous
bans by different countries during this decade. In fact, initial discoveries
of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy ("mad cow") in December 2003 continue to
taint American beef exports.
But beef isn't our beat ... we prefer the world of money and markets. Recently,
investors have similarly found a few contaminants in their own investment holdings.
Beginning with sub-prime mortgage backed bonds, asset-backed commercial paper
of all stripes have been relegated to the "infected" pile with no buyers to
be found. A closer examination of the content showed that not enough additional
yield was awarded for commensurate increases in risk.
Income Strapped But Still Searching. With the backdrop of worldwide
declining yields, it's no wonder investors had been venturing out farther on
the risk curve searching for higher yielding instruments. It has been a long
decline. The average S&P 500 dividend yield was 4.2% during the 1980s,
dropping to 2.4% in the 1990s, and only 1.5% so far this decade. While S&P
500 earnings have soared this decade, today's payout ratios (the proportion
of earnings paid out to shareholders in the form of dividends) are in the
bottom quartile, as compared to the period from 1950 to 1991.
Similarly, in longer dated bonds, yields have come from a high of over 13%
in the early eighties to about 4.5% most recently. Corporate bond and emerging
debt spreads have also collapsed, providing very little incentive to venture
out on the risk curve.
Clearly, we are now in an environment of lower yields while the demographic
shift taking place will only increase the demand for dividends and other income-oriented
products. (The first US Baby Boomer filed for Social Security benefits earlier
this month). But risks shouldn't be ignored while attempting to secure
higher yields.
Yield Hogging - Alternatives to the Dregs. Turning to the recent rash
of income ETFs, consider these investment categories for yield oriented portfolios:
• Dividend-weighted ETFs: Challenging traditional market capitalization
weighted indexes, the ETF industry's forays into the alternative weighting
field has caught our attention. WisdomTree has a full and expanding suite of
dividend-weighted ETFs based on the premise that over the long term companies
with lower price earnings ratios and higher dividends usually outperform the
more exciting growth companies with higher price earnings ratios and meager
payouts. WisdomTree's Emerging Markets High-Yielding Equity Fund (NYSE:DEM)
has a dividend yield of almost 6% and is overweighted in emerging Asia markets
where we are more bullish long term.

Many Asian countries (ex-China!) still trade at discounts to developed markets.
Since many of these emerging companies are growing in the same pool of earnings
as developed multinationals a secular convergence of valuations seems likely.
Significant recent capital investment, healthy country balance sheets and bulging
foreign exchange reserves all bode well for future long term returns and sustainable
dividend payouts.
• Timberland: Claymore Investments has filed papers with the US
Securities and Exchange Commission for the right to launch the first US-listed
ETF tracking a global timberland index. Stable income that is non-correlated
to the stock market makes timberland investments an important part of diversified
portfolios. According to data compiled from the National Council of Real Estate
Investment Fiduciaries (from 1960 to the present), timberland has had
only three negative years and beaten the stock market over that time. We'll
be on watch for this new listing from Claymore.
• Domestic and Foreign Bonds: Recent issues of ETFocus have
extolled the virtues of including bonds. ETFs cover an increasing number of
areas in global debt markets, both in government and corporate sectors. International
bonds are also a key area which should be considered. For Canadian domiciled
accounts, at the least it makes sense to partially diversify currency exposure
(recent speculative flows show a record net long in the Canadian dollar,
indicating that historical positioning has reached definitively extreme territory).
Asian bonds are an excellent example of a foreign fixed income market with
low correlation qualities, in addition to higher yields, attractive value and
sufficient liquidity. Improving credit quality, significantly undervalued currencies
and positive structural economic reforms in the emerging Asian region herald
attractive returns. The Hong Kong listed ABF Pan Asia Bond ETF (HKSE:2821),
a basket of Asian currency denominated bonds issued by both government and
quasi-government organizations in developing Asia, fits the bill here.
• Preferred shares: In light of the Canadian federal government's
decision on income trusts, preferred shares present a lower volatility alternative.
Claymore's S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share ETF (TSX:CPD) bundles
more than 50 securities, reducing issuer specific risk. The offering currently
yields close to 5%, not to mention preferential tax treatment for taxable accounts.
• Income-focused ETFs: In a December 2001 study entitled
"Does Dividend Policy Foretell Earnings Growth?", researchers Robert Arnott
and Clifford Asness found contradictory evidence to the commonly held view
that low payout ratios lead to higher future earnings growth. The authors detail
historical evidence over the period from 1950 to 1991 suggesting the opposite
correlation - that is, earnings growth is fastest when payouts are high. A
key implication of increased global trade is no country wanting a strong currency.
With the Federal Reserve beginning to decrease the fed funds rate and a trade-weighted
US dollar that has already fallen nearly 20% over the last two years, many
central banks will be reluctant to raise rates. In this environment of declining
short rates, dividend yields will be even more secure than fixed income investments
(and certainly relative to both short and long durations). In addition
to the WisdomTree lineup, several ETF providers offer dividendfocused ETFs.
Each methodology is different, including some screening process. For example,
some dividend ETFs are based on companies with at least ten years of consecutive
dividend increases, while others focus exclusively on the highest yielding
securities.
Now to the Beef. As the ABCP fiasco has shown, selecting income focused
investments should incorporate the usual screening process - primarily ensuring
adequate diversification, reasonable fees, sufficient liquidity and an in-depth
knowledge of the underlying assets. Of particular importance with dividend-focused
ETFs, however, is their underlying sector and style biases. Notably, most will
tend to have either a value or small cap tilt ...not necessarily a negative,
depending on the investment outlook.
Currently, many are enormously overweight the financial sector, as the lending
boom of the last several years has boosted profits and increased dividends.
Consider the PowerShares High Yield Equity Dividends Achievers Portfolio (AMEX:PEY)
with a financial weighting of over triple the S&P 500 (approximately
63% versus 20% in the broad S&P 500), and a small cap value weighting
of about 54%.
With the credit crunch continuing in the US and spreading globally, we have
had an underweight in financials and an overweight in US large-cap growth investments
since the middle of last year. After seven years of both small cap and value
outperformance, large growth is now outperforming this year. With international
earnings continuing to be the fastest growth area for US multinationals, growth
indexes are heavily laden with globally-diversified, non-cyclical companies.
In comparison, value benchmarks tend to generate more revenue from domestic
sources and are currently overweight financials.
Should the credit markets further tighten, cyclically sensitive and LBO-fueled
small caps should underperform blue-chip multinationals as smaller companies
will face higher hurdles in accessing credit. The supply of small caps could
increase as private equity funds place acquired companies back on public stock
markets.
Conclusions. Has a new environment of risk aversion emerged in financial
markets? While the jury is still out, certainly a flight to quality in certain
sectors has occurred over the last few months. Witness declining short-term
bond yields, large inflows into money markets (according to the Investment
Company Institute, US money market mutual fund assets have increased at a 60%
annualized rate over the last 13 weeks to a record total of nearly USD 3 trillion)
and some higher risk asset classes experiencing consolidation (see recent
performance of many small capitalization equities).
For now, transparency seems bound to be a virtue once again held on high.
Exchange-traded funds really shine in that category. With widely-diversified
investments that have fully transparent holdings, intra-day pricing and no
specific equity or corporate fixed-income risk, one cannot ignore the benefits.
Many investors may continue to ask "where's the beef?" But with dislocations
in credit markets continuing, the more relevant question today is "what's in
the beef?"
|