|
I've had this research on MBIA sitting on my desktop for some time now, too
busy to convert it into a post for the blog. The macro situation stemming from
the real estate bust is unfolding just as I have surmised, albeit a bit quicker
and more far reaching than I originally thought. It is scary, for nobody wants
to see bad things happen to other people, and I don't want to get caught in
a financial downturn regardless of how well prepared I try to make myself.
On the other hand, these situations create significant opportunity for gain,
primarily from those who refuse to acknowledge the fact that the wave is not
only coming, but has reached us quite a while back. I have learned unequivocally
what many probably new for some time now. What is that you ask? You really
just can't trust government data. Now, I don't want to get into politics and
conspiracy theories, but the data as of late has been so far removed from the
obvious reality for many that it is almost signaling that the government doesn't
even want you to heed the data and is giving you the requisite warning signals.
Examples of which are employment data and inflation. Alas, and as usual, I
digress, as such is the mind of insane idiot savant that my kids call Dad.
Now, back to the title - What so special about the number 104? It is the number
that will probably scare the pants off of anyone who is in equity investors,
or potentially anyone who is a customer, of MBIA's insurance and guarantee
products. It is the number that when reached, will leave the equity investor
with shareholder certificates worth nothing. It is the number where MBIA's
equity is wiped clean. Why are you being so damn cryptic Reggie, you ask? Because,
I need for you to go through this history of how we came to this point before
I explain in detail, so as to get a clear and comprehensive understanding of
the situation. That is part of it; the other part is just because I feel like
it. Now, let me give you a little cartoon of what the number is, then a background
of how we got in this mess to begin with, then an analysis that shows how I
got to this number. As usual, you can click on any graph to enlarge it.

Larger
Image
And then...

Larger
Image
Some time ago I came across this report
on the MBIA and ABK by Pershing Square and found it absolutely intriguing.
I posted it on this blog on September 3rd, when these companies were trading
in the 60's and 70's roughly, and respectively (sometimes it actually pays
to read this blog:-). I was actually impressed enough to take a small short
position of my own without doing my own forensic analysis. This is something
that I regret. Why? Because I am willing to assume significant risk once I
convince myself of the strength of a position. Using third party research,
I dabble at best - and rarely do I use third party research. So, I dabbled
when I should have looked harder and took a significant position. After the
fact, I looked further into the industry on an anecdotal basis, then all of
a sudden, Bam! The proverbial feces hit the fan blades. The stocks fell so
far, so fast, I was taken aback. So, I asked part of my analytical team to
take a look at these guys, for I knew that a major problem the monolines, the
banks, and the builders all had was a lack of understanding and respect for
the rate of decline in value and default of instruments linked to bubble real
estate - combined with excessive leverage. So they took a cursory look for
me, and they pretty much confirmed my suspicions, but it is not straightforward.
There conflicts of interest issues that goes far and wide. So much so, that
I will most assuredly not be making anymore friends with this blog. Many of
the financial professionals know this, but the layman may not.
What's wrong with the ratings agencies?
What's wrong with the ratings agencies? All of the major rating agencies feel
MBIA is in good standing to weather the storm. Coincidentally, they all receive
significant fees from the monolines and their customers. Hmmm! Now, there is
this song by Kanye West, the rapper. A verse goes, "I'm not saying she's
a gold digger..." Well, to make a long story short, any analysis born from
compensation received from the entity you are analyzing will always be suspect,
at least in my eyes. Conflicts of interest and financially incestuous relationships
appear rampant to the paranoid conspiracy type (like me). If you remember my
analysis of Ryland, I looked at data as far back as 1993. That gave a succinct,
but barely acceptable snapshot of what to expect in turbulent times from a
historical perspective. You would need much more data to analyze the more complex
topic of MBS. It is believed by the naysayers, that the major ratings agencies
have sampled data from only the good times, thus that is why their worst case
scenarios still smell like roses. Their predictive prowess over the last few
years doesn't look very impressive either. Massive swath of investment grade
securities (that they, themselves, labeled investment grade - and were paid
by the securities' issuers to do so) are being downgraded straight to junk.
I know if I invested in AAA bonds that are losing principal and downgraded
to junk in a year or two by the same rating that gave it an investment grade
rating in the first place, I would be pissed. But, that is what happens without
the proper due diligence, I guess. At least that is what the ratings agencies
are bound to say. When looking at data gathered from the real estate boom,
and not the busts, you get:
Continue
reading "A Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt II, by Reggie
Middleton" »
|
Reggie Middleton
http://boombustblog.com/
Reggie
Middleton is the personification of the freethinking maverick--the penultimate
nonconformist as it applies to macro strategies, investment, and analysis.
He uses his background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk
management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation,
and financial analysis to pursue, analyze, and capitalize on global macroeconomic
opportunities.
Finding most available research lacking, both in quality
and quantity, Mr. Middleton assembled his own talented research staff. As forensic
research is a lynchpin for his own investing, "to actually put food on the
table," he stands behind it as doing what it is supposed to do - illustrate,
elucidate and educate.
He does not sell advice or research. He is an entrepreneur
who exists outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows
him the freedom to do things that many cannot--perform without conflicts of
interest and corporate politics. He prides himself on developing some of the
highest quality, actionable research available - regardless of price. He welcomes
any and all to peruse his blog of freely available analysis, opinion and participatory
social media; use his custom tools, download files, interact with the community
and make critical comparisons from a results orientated perspective. Reggie
believes ideas and implementations are improved and fine-tuned when bounced
off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - in
essence, a form of collaborative open source financial analysis.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2008 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|