|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
18th November 2007.
Which market is wrong?
The top section of the following chart compares the BSE/gold ratio (the Indian
stock market in gold terms) with the GYX/gold ratio (the Industrial Metals
Index divided by the gold price). It clearly shows that both the industrial
metals sector of the commodity universe and the Indian stock market trended
upward in real (gold) terms from 2003 through 2006. It also clearly shows that
a divergence began to develop in October of 2006 and that this divergence has
become rather dramatic over the past 6 months. In fact, with the GYX/gold ratio
having just hit its lowest level in more than two years it is obvious that
the industrial metals sector embarked on a cyclical BEAR market in gold terms
during October of 2006, and yet the BSE has continued to trend upward relative
to gold.
For many years prior to October of 2006 the trends in the industrial metals
sector and the Indian stock market appeared to be inseparable. Their performances
relative to gold were, in turn, indicative of what was happening to global
growth, with the declining trends of these markets (in gold terms) during 2000-2003
representing the slow economic growth and contracting liquidity of that period
and the subsequent rising trends representing a worldwide expansion of liquidity
and faster economic growth. It is therefore somewhat strange that the markets
have taken such divergent paths since October of last year, and especially
since the middle of this year. Is one of these markets wrong, and, if so, which
one?
For two main reasons, we think the Indian stock market is sending the wrong
message. The first of these reasons relates to the bottom section of our chart.
The bottom section of the chart shows that prior to this year the intermediate-term
trends for both GYX/gold and BSE/gold were the same as the intermediate-term
trend for the US yield-spread (represented, here, by the ratio of the 3-month
T-Bill yield and the 30-year T-Bond yield*). Specifically, GYX and BSE were
in upward trends relative to gold when short-term rates were rising relative
to long-term rates and in downward trends relative to gold when short-term
rates were falling relative to long-term rates. But while the GYX/gold ratio
has continued to move in line with the US yield-spread, the BSE/gold ratio
has, to date, totally ignored the yield-spread's major trend reversal.
Now, it could be argued that the fundamental underpinnings of the Indian stock
market justify its divergence from the industrial metals group. After all,
it doesn't necessarily follow that reduced demand for industrial metals stemming
from a downturn in the US housing market should be associated with slower growth
in India.
Which brings us to our second reason for thinking that the Indian stock market
is wrong: the primary propellant of this year's rise in the Indian stock market
has not been a significant improvement in fundamental factors, but has, instead,
been the general willingness of 'investors' to bid-up prices despite very high
valuations. The BSE Sensex 30 Index, for instance, currently has a P/E ratio
of around 25 and a dividend yield of less than 1%.
In our opinion, at some point over the next several months the BSE/gold ratio
will plunge to a sufficient extent to bring itself back into line with the
GYX/gold ratio.

*Note: we normally chart the yield-spread in such a way that a rising line
is indicative of long-term interest rates rising relative to short-term interest
rates, but in this case we've charted it such that a rising line represents
a decline in long-term rates relative to short-term rates.
Gold or Tech?
Two weeks ago we mentioned that Microsoft (MSFT) had broken upward from a
7-year base and that we would be buyers on a pullback to around $33. Then,
in the email sent to subscribers early last week we mentioned that Monday's
decline to the low-$33 area had prompted us to take an initial position in
the stock.
An investment in MSFT appeals to us at this time for five reasons: First,
the breakout from the long-term base evident on the following chart suggests
that the stock will make significant additional gains over the coming year.
Second, the company is growing its earnings at a robust rate. Third, it has
a truly multi-national business and its earnings growth is therefore not dependent
upon the health of any one country's economy. Fourth, it has a pristine balance
sheet and is largely unaffected by the on-going debt crisis. And fifth, it
has pricing power (very important in a high-inflation world).
One concern we have is that we can't imagine a scenario in which there's a
sufficient decline in monetary confidence to cause the gold price to move above
$1000 combined with sufficient demand for large-cap tech stocks such as MSFT
to keep these stocks in upward trends. In other words, we are concerned that
a long position in gold is at odds with a long position in MSFT.
One way of reconciling this seemingly self-contradictory stance is to recognise
that each position is justified based on individual market analysis even though
the positions appear to be inconsistent with each other. Another way is to
simply appreciate that there are many investment baskets and no law that says
we must choose just one in which to put all of our eggs. We are not fans of
diversification for its own sake because the more someone diversifies the more
mediocre his/her performance will become, but we recognise that it's never
prudent to bet everything on a single investment idea. We therefore tend to
have one big basket -- a golden one, at the moment -- and a few smaller baskets.

|