"This is the most asinine and thoroughly ridiculous thing I have ever heard!
In all my years of studying economics and rigorously defending my theories...I
have never heard of such a thing as a 'danger of low inflation'..."
"The Dollar Crisis" by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute, says, "Have a look at Murray Rothbard's America's
Great Depression, which remains the best overall account of why the stock
market crash happened and what Hoover did to make everything worse. Murray
shows that the depression was not a crisis of capitalism but the result of
a disastrously loose monetary policy in the 1920s."
Book? What in the hell is he talking about? I am here to learn how to make
a lot of easy money in a hurry, and he wants me to read? Oh, crap!
So I find myself growing ill at east about this "reading" thing, but Mr. Rockwell
relentlessly goes on, "Do you find yourself tripped up by inflationists throwing
intellectual curveballs? Maybe you should sit down with the great treatise
on money and banking in our time: Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles by
Jesus Huerta de Soto."
Again with the books! I start to get up to leave, but as I gathered up my
lunchbox, my bag of snacks, my pizza box, a bag of potato chips and a bag of
Oreos, he says, "Back in the 19th century, there were many people who wanted
inflation: bankers, debtors, and the government", and I think to myself, "Hey!
Just like now! This could be interesting!"
And indeed it is, as it brings up an article in the Financial Times with the
title "Bernanke
seeks to have the best of both worlds." The pertinent paragraph was, "Mr.
Bernanke signaled that the implied objective would not be 'zero inflation,
properly measured', but something higher than that, because of the danger of
very low inflation" Hahaha!
"Danger of very low inflation"! Hahahaha! This is the most asinine and thoroughly
ridiculous thing I have ever heard! In all my years of studying economics and
rigorously defending my theories (Them: "You're an idiot!" Me: "No, I'm, not!"),
I have never heard of such a thing as a "danger of low inflation", and a Google
search showed that there is not one instance of anybody saying that there was
such a thing, even hypothetically, as "the dangers of low inflation", because
inflation in prices was always supposed to be, and assumed to be, zero, or
less, and it usually was, and everything was always fine, and there is not
much that is lower than "zero or less".
So that is why the references to inflation being "too low" are actually about "the
dangers of deflation", which is that awful feeling you get when you notice
that all those assets you acquired in the big boom are not going up in value
lately, and they are costing you money, and people are not borrowing money
to buy them from you, and it appears that the Last Sucker In Line Who Paid
The Top Price At The Top has been identified, and it is you, and you are ready
to sell at a loss just to get away from the embarrassment.
And now Ben Bernanke, as is promised by "targeting inflation" and heralded
by the spooky sound of ravenous wolves howling in the distance and getting
closer and closer, is going to bury us in price inflation and destroy us all,
but that is the only thing he can do, as there is literally nothing he can
do, for if there was, someone else in all of history would have thought of
it, and tried it, when their stupid experiments with fiat currencies destroyed
them, and believe me when I tell you that they tried everything, and they all
failed.
Then, I almost gagged on a burrito I was eating to get the taste of this whole
Bernanke thing out of my mouth, when I read the Bloomberg.com news
item that included "Stephen Cecchetti, professor of international economics
at Brandeis University and a former research director at the New York Fed",
which appears to be pretty impressive credentials until you next read that
he said, "Nothing leads me to suggest that there's an inflationary pass-through
from dollar depreciation." Hahahaha!
I am simultaneously busting a gut laughing while puking up blood and odd bits
of burrito in anger, as this is too, too, too much!
I see Jim Rogers, being interviewed by Bloomberg.com, and I motion for him
to take over here and give this moron a few Blistering Mogambo Insults (BMI),
such as, "You, sir, are a moron and you should be whipped, and you would be
whipped if Americans were not stupid as posts or our Congresspersons were not
so corrupt (except Ron Paul)!"
Instead, it is reported that Mr. Rogers went after Federal Reserve Chairman
Bernanke "for comments on the currency before a congressional committee on
Nov. 8."
Mr. Rogers is quoted as actually saying, "He is a total fool." And about what
is Bernanke a fool? "He said Americans who buy only American goods are not
affected if the value of the U.S. dollar goes down. I was terrified."
And to prove that Mr. Rogers did NOT graduate from the Mogambo School Of Stinging
Editorial Critique (MSOSEC), no matter what his resume says or doesn't say,
he didn't stop there and start viciously attacking the character of the guy,
the guy's family and children, the guy's friends, telling vicious lies and
ruining their credit rating, which is what you learn on Day One at the MSOSEC.
Rather, he just explained how even newborn babies, fresh from the womb, cry
because they know that, "If you only buy American products and the dollar goes
down, the price of oil goes up, copper goes up, wheat goes up. That affects
you. He doesn't understand the economy as far as I can see."
Being a graduate of the MSOSEC, I would have said more. Much more. With obscenities.
Lots of them. Ugh.
Mogambo sez: If it weren't for gold, we would be in a mess with no place to
go for safety. If it weren't for silver, we wouldn't have such a startling
upside potential.
And if it weren't for corrupt people in and out of government who have created
the mess, neither one of these assets would make us as filthy stinking rich
as they are going to make us, as the ultimate value of fiat currency is always
literally zero, meaning that when all the money is gone, the skimpy 5 billion
ounces of gold extant in the world will be, theoretically, ALL the money, and
the people who have some of it will have their share of everything! Wheee!
P.S. To get The Daily Reckoning sent directly to your
inbox, sign up for our
free email newsletter, or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily
Reckoning RSS feed.