|
Warning: this is an opinionated blog article that may offend those employed
by large rating's agencies or monoline insurers. Recommend reading as a backgrounder:
- A
Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by Reggie
Middleton.
- Ambac
is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More than $8 Billion of Losses
with Just a $2.26 Billion Market Cap
- Follow
up to the Ambac Analysis
From Bloomberg news:
MBIA Inc. fell the most in more than 20 years in New York trading after
Moody's Investors Service said the biggest bond insurer is "somewhat likely" to
face a shortage of capital that threatens its AAA credit rating.
A review of MBIA and six other AAA rated guarantors will be completed within
two weeks, Moody's said in a statement today. Moody's revised its assessment
from last month that MBIA was unlikely to need more capital after additional
scrutiny of the Armonk, New York-based bond insurer's mortgage-backed securities
portfolio.
"The guarantor is at greater risk of exhibiting a capital shortfall than
previously communicated, (about a week and a half ago
- my, aren't we fickle with our opinions) New York-based Moody's said. "We
now consider this somewhat likely."
From Standard & Poors:
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services today lowered its ratings to 'D'
on the senior swap and the class A, B-1, B-2, C, D, and E notes issued by
Adams Square Funding I Ltd. The downgrades follow notice from the trustee
that the portfolio collateral has been liquidated and the credit default
swaps for the transaction terminated.
The issuance amount of the downgraded collateralized debt obligation (CDO)
notes is $487.25 million.
According to the notice from the trustee, the sale proceeds from the liquidation
of the cash assets, along with the proceeds in the collateral principal collection
account, super-senior reserve account, credit default swap (CDS) reserve
account, and other sources, were not adequate to cover the required termination
payments to the CDS counterparty. As a result, the CDO had to draw the balance
from the super-senior swap counterparty. Based on the notice we received,
the trustee anticipates that proceeds will not be sufficient to cover the
funded portion of the super-senior swap in full and that no proceeds will
be available for distribution to the class A, B, C, D, or E notes.
Today's rating actions reflect the impact of the liquidation of the collateral
at depressed prices. Therefore, these rating actions are more severe than
would be justified had liquidation not been ordered, in which case our rating
actions would have been based on the credit deterioration of the underlying
collateral. Across the cash flow assets sold and credit default swaps terminated,
we estimate, based on the values reported by the trustee, that the collateral
in Adams Square Funding I Ltd. yielded, on average, the equivalent of a market
value of less than 25% of par value.
Mind you, Ambac's insured portfolio is 32% of this stuff. Are there anymore
debates to be had regarding 50% or more recovery values?

Last quarter, Ambac increased its structured product loss reserve by about
$75 million. Would that even be enough to cover the one loss above??? They
have $29 billion of CDO exposure backed heavily by Subprime RMBS and
ABS CDO Mezzanine that is more than likely to - no, let's make that, definitely
result in significantly higher losses for the company. Remember, I feel that
public finance will not be the cash cow it use to be and may even develop notable
losses due to the bidding up of budgets on bubble revenue that is no longer
available.
And what's up with S&P??? Their ratings go from AAA to D in one downgrade.
You buy AAA rated paper, rated the same as paper with the full faith and backing
of the richest government in the world, then suddenly you are told you won't
get your money back! I might as well jump on Moody's ass as well. They change
their tune on MBIA and the monolines (sounds like a music group akin to the
Monkeys, or the Beetles) every other week. Everybody makes mistakes, especially
me. But this is not a mistake. This stuff was not hard to see coming. Hell,
all you had to do was read this blog. I query... Why, oh why, are investors
heeding the reports of the ratings agencies? How many times must you get hit
in the face before you put your hands up? I am not one for litigation (actually
I hate and despise it, to put it lightly), but this stuff really, really begs
the question.
The CDO story links into the article about from the
good doctor and leads into my next set of concentrated shorts as well.
I am looking into overpaying with stupidly low cap rates (commercial real
estate gurus) and guys who have mounds of credit risk exposure to other guys
who couldn't pay up if their lives depended on it. I will release the research
to the free portion of the blog once I get my shorts in order - roughly a
week or two.
Now, back to Ambac and our regularly scheduled programming...
High reserve estimates in mortgage backed home equity
Ambac has steadily increased its reserve estimate on the mortgage backed and
home equity portfolio as the US subprime mortgage market crisis began to have
its implications on the financial guarantor industry. Ambac having a significant
exposure of $8.8 billion in direct subprime RMBS and the $29 bn in the CDOs
is likely to witness a rise in claims owing to rise in default in mortgage
market. Ambac is increasing its reserve estimates to be able to settle the
claims in future, but the important point is will it be sufficient? Ambac
has a loss expense reserve of $279 million and unearned premiums of $3.1 billion. If
the default rates continue to worsen, resulting in increased number of foreclosures
it would result in higher losses for Ambac. This carries a distinctly very
high probability.

Loss ratio will worsen as claims rise
Going forward we expect the company's loss ratio to worsen as the company
witnesses rises in the loss expenses. We believe
the amount of losses from the direct RMBS, structured finance and consumer
finance portfolio will wipe out the company's entire equity.

Deterioration in net claims paid ratio
The secret of success of all the monoliners has been the low net claims paid
ratio, Ambac in its recent presentation said its net claims paid ratio has
been 4.3% since its IPO in 1991. Ambac's net claims paid ratio has been in
the range of 10-12% in the last two years, while in 9M 07 it has been significantly
lower, actually negative. Going forward, the net claims paid ratio is expected
to worsen and anticipated to reach all time high levels of 35% in 2008. Recovery
on CDOs losses can be expected to approach zero.

Will Ambac be tripping over covenants soon? Creditors may be calling
On July 30, 2007, Ambac Financial Group, Inc., as borrowers, entered into
an amended and restated $400 million five year unsecured, committed revolving
credit facility with Citibank, N. A., as administrative agent, The Bank of
New York and KeyBank, National Association, as co-syndication agents, HSBC
Bank USA, N. A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association as co-documentation
agents and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as the sole lead arranger and sole
book runner, and certain other financial institutions, as lenders. The Amended
and Restated Credit Facility replaces a previously existing $400 million five
year unsecured, committed revolving credit facility, which was due to expire
on July 28, 2011. The New Credit Facility expires on July 30, 2012...
The Company and/or Ambac Assurance may borrow under the Amended and Restated
Credit Facility for general corporate purposes, including the payment of claims.
Subject to the terms and conditions thereof, the Company and/or Ambac Assurance
may borrow under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility until the final maturity
date, which will occur on July 30, 2012...
The Amended and Restated Credit Facility contains customary representations,
warranties and covenants for this type of financing, including two financial
covenants: (i) maintain as of the end of each fiscal
quarter a debt-to-capital ratio, excluding debt consolidated under FIN 46,
hybrid securites and credit link notes, of not more than 30%, and (ii) maintain
at all times total stockholder's equity equal to or greater than $2.9 billion. The
stockholders' equity financial covenant will increase annually, in an amount
equal to 15% of the prior fiscal year's net income and 15% of the net proceeds
of any future equity issuances. The Amended and Restated Credit Facility also
provides for certain events of default with corresponding grace periods, including
failure to pay any principal or interest when due, failure to comply with covenants,
any material representation or warranty made by the Company or Ambac Assurance
proving to be false in any material respect, certain bankruptcy, insolvency
or receivership events affecting the Company or Ambac Assurance, defaults relating
to other indebtedness, imposition of certain judgments and a change in ownership
of the Company and/or Ambac Assurance.
Comment
Ambac's revolving credit facility of $400 million is subject to various
financial covenants such as maintenance of a debt to capital ratio of 30%
and stock holder's equity of greater than $ 2.9 billion. We anticipate the
huge losses that the company could witness owing to its subprime exposure
in its portfolio could erode its shareholder's equity. As of 30th September
2007, Ambac has a shareholder's equity of $5.7 billion and a debt/total capital
ratio of 19.7%. The amount of losses on Ambac's portfolio continues to be
a hotly debated topic, and how much of its equity will be eroded continues
to a topic of discussion among the financial pundits. However, our concern
relates to the Ambac's ability to maintain any equity in the face of a deluge
of rising and increasingly voluminous losses on its structured products portfolio.
Ceded premium to become unanticipated risk?
From 3Q 07- 10Q, page no-56
To minimize exposure to significant losses from reinsurers, Ambac Assurance
(i) monitors the financial condition of its reinsurers; (ii) is entitled to
receive collateral from its reinsurance counterparties in certain reinsurance
contracts; and (iii) has certain cancellation rights that can be exercised
by Ambac Assurance in the event of a rating downgrade of a reinsurer. Ambac
Assurance held letters of credit and collateral amounting to approximately
$379.2 million from its reinsurers as of September 30, 2007. The rating agencies
continually review reinsurers providing coverage to the financial guarantee
industry. The following table provides ceded par outstanding by financial strength
rating of Ambac Assurance's reinsurers, on a Standard and Poor's ("S&P" - see
my comments on S&P above) basis:
In $ billion |
September 30, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 |
AAA |
21.1 |
20.7 |
AA |
34.0 |
27.7 |
| |
55.1 |
48.4 |
Comment:
The financial strength of the company's reinsuring Ambac's portfolio can
be a cause for concern as the ceded par to the AA rated reinsures have witnessed
a significant increase since FY 2006. Moreover, any potential downgrading
of the ratings of the reinsurance companies can be devastating for Ambac
(and the ratings agencies have been on a mission to regain credibility, lately).
The turmoil in the subprime mortgage market resulting in huge claims from
various financial institutions could result in huge payout for these reinsurance
companies. Their ability to pay the claims to these companies will test their
ability to maintain their ratings. Moreover, in case any of the reinsurance
companies (reinsuring Ambac's portfolio) fails it would put undue pressure
on Ambac ability to manage the huge losses on its portfolio. Ambac having
its portfolio reinsured mainly from AA rated reinsurance companies is a potential
threat for the company. In the recent presentation, Ambac chief has identified
reinsurance as a potential option to offload risk, we believe it would obviously
not be on favorable terms for Ambac.
|