|
This is part one of a two part response to comments and questions on the recent
events concerning the Ambac and MBIA. The second part will be a forensic marking
to market of Ambac's portfolio based upon the recent E*Trade sale. Required
reading for this article includes:
- A
Super Scary Halloween Tale of 104 Basis Points Pt I & II, by Reggie
Middleton.
- Ambac
is Effectively Insolvent & Will See More than $8 Billion of Losses
with Just a $2.26 Billion Market Cap
- Follow
up to the Ambac Analysis
- Monolines
swoon, CDOs go boom & I really wonder why the ratings agencies are
given any credibility
- Bill
Ackman of Pershing Square - How to save the Monolines
Note: this came directly from one of my analysts, who seems to have been infected
by my smart ass writing style :-)
MBIA - The company mentioned that "fair value" of their portfolio dropped
by $850 million in the one month between September 30 and October 30, 2007.
That speaks volumes. As far as equity infusion is concerned, MBIA is merely
replacing the capital they have already lost. This may sound simplistic, but
this is how it is. The caveat is, they are replacing it by diluting their current
shareholders. Thus, those who did not do the math have bid the share price
up, instead of down. Given the significant amount of exposure that the company
has (MBIA has about $84 billion in residential ABS and CDO exposure), $1 billion
of capital infusion at this point may not be sufficient; though it may keep
off the immediate rating downgrade concern. The company has also mentioned
that they're setting aside $800 million to cover estimated losses on residential
mortgage-backed securities in the fourth quarter. This will further impact
its bottom line.
Regarding Warburg's investment, although there is not much data available
at this point to comment on the additional $500 million commitment based on
the current share price or the approximate market price in the first quarter,
I read an analyst quoting that based on an option-pricing model, the value
of Warburg's warrants range from $3.14 to $6.55 a share which means that Warburg
effectively paid less than $28 a share for the stock based on a conservative
valuation of the warrants, or as low as $24.45 based on more aggressive estimates
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119730169419019425.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo).
Yet, again, the mathematically challenged bid the price up and above what Warburg
was willing to pay.
When it comes to rating agencies "review", I liked what Jonathan Weil said
a couple of days back: If MBIA Is AAA, Britney Spears is Snow White J
(http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aFwZKa2jzPfQ).
Last week, credit- default swaps tied to MBIA Insurance Corp.'s bonds were
193 basis points, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In other words,
it cost about $193,000 to buy a contract protecting $10 million of bonds from
default for five years. That implies about a 15% probability of default - for
a company rated AAA. Keep in mind that the US treasuries are a AAA benchmark.
Compare and contrast!
However, if MBIA (and other bond insurers such as Ambac, Radian, etc.) are
able to raise capital to keep up with the losses, and, as the company talked
about reviewing its capital management policies, writing more business and
resorting to reinsurance, it is likely that the rating agencies may not downgrade
the AAA rating. We still don't think the company will fare well with the potential
losses coming down the pike, regardless of the rating agencies say.
2) Ambac - As highlighted in the valuation,
we were conservative regarding the defaults in the company's consumer finance
portfolio since our emphasis was more on the Subprime RMBS and the Structured
Finance portfolios. The potential losses in Ambac's auto receivables portfolio,
after subordination, ranges from $675 million to $2.5 billion, in different
scenarios. In the base case, we estimate default rates in Ambac's Auto Receivables
portfolio as 11% which indicates total losses of $1.3 billion. However, like
mentioned in the comment below, potential losses could be significantly more
than our estimates. A spreadsheet with a full evaluation of this auto portfolio,
losses and loss projections are available for premium
subscribers.
|
Reggie Middleton
http://boombustblog.com/
Reggie
Middleton is the personification of the freethinking maverick--the penultimate
nonconformist as it applies to macro strategies, investment, and analysis.
He uses his background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk
management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation,
and financial analysis to pursue, analyze, and capitalize on global macroeconomic
opportunities.
Finding most available research lacking, both in quality
and quantity, Mr. Middleton assembled his own talented research staff. As forensic
research is a lynchpin for his own investing, "to actually put food on the
table," he stands behind it as doing what it is supposed to do - illustrate,
elucidate and educate.
He does not sell advice or research. He is an entrepreneur
who exists outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows
him the freedom to do things that many cannot--perform without conflicts of
interest and corporate politics. He prides himself on developing some of the
highest quality, actionable research available - regardless of price. He welcomes
any and all to peruse his blog of freely available analysis, opinion and participatory
social media; use his custom tools, download files, interact with the community
and make critical comparisons from a results orientated perspective. Reggie
believes ideas and implementations are improved and fine-tuned when bounced
off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - in
essence, a form of collaborative open source financial analysis.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2008 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|