|
Among those rational enough to perceive the looming economic downturn, a heated
debate has arisen that centers on whether the slowdown will be accompanied
by inflation or deflation.
Those in the deflation camp believe that money supply will collapse as a natural
consequence of the implosion of the biggest credit bubble in U.S. history.
As loans go bad, assets, which collateralize these loans, will be sold at fire
sale prices to satisfy creditors. It is also argued that a recession will reduce
consumer discretionary spending, causing retailers to slash prices to move
their bloated inventories. This is the way the situation played out in the
1930's and this is how many expect it to happen today.
However there are several key differences between then and now, which argue
against the classic deflationary scenario. In particular, the Fed's ability
to pump liquidity into the market in the 1930's was limited by the gold backing
requirements on U.S. currency. No such limitations exist today. This distinction
is critical. When credit was destroyed after the Crash of 1929, the Fed was
not able to simply replace it out of thin air. Today however, the Fed will
likely print as much money as necessary to prevent nominal prices from collapsing.
In fact, in the infamous speech that spawned his "helicopter" sobriquet, Ben
Bernanke explained how the printing press can be used to stop deflation dead
in its tracks.
To fully understand the way inflation and deflation affect prices, we need
to differentiate between assets, such as stocks and real estate, and consumer
goods, such as shoes and potato chips. If we measure prices in gold, as we
did during the 1930's, both asset and consumer goods prices will fall, with
the former falling faster than the latter. So in that sense the deflationist
are correct. However, in terms of today's paper dollars, this outcome is completely
impossible. During deflation, money gains value, so prices naturally fall as
fewer monetary units are required to buy a given quantity of goods. In the
coming deflation, real money (gold) will gain considerable value, so prices
will therefore fall sharply in gold terms. Paper dollars however, which have
no intrinsic value at all, will lose value, not only as the Fed increases their
supply, but as global demand for the currency implodes.
The way I see it there are only two possible scenarios. The more benign outcome
would we be one where asset prices fall, even in terms of paper dollars, but
consumer goods prices continue to rise. This would be the stagflation scenario.
The more catastrophic scenario is one where asset prices hold steady or even
resume their ascent, while consumer goods prices rise even faster. This of
course is the hyper-inflation scenario, and is the worst possible outcome.
I see no possible scenario where consumer goods prices fall in term of paper
dollars.
Many mistakenly believe that when the U.S. economy falls into recession, reduced
domestic demand will lead to falling consumer prices. However, what is often
overlooked is the fact that as the dollar loses value, the rising relative
values of foreign currencies will increase consumer demand abroad. As fewer
foreign-made products are imported and more domestic-made products are exported,
the result will be far fewer products available for Americans to consume. So
even if the domestic money supply were to contract, the supply of goods for
sale would contract even faster. Shrinking supply will be a major factor in
pushing consumer prices higher in America.
In addition, since trillions of dollars now reside with our foreign creditors,
even if many of these dollars are lost due to defaulted loans, those that are
not will be used to buy up American consumer goods and assets. As a result
of this huge influx of foreign-held dollars, the domestic dollar supply will
likely rise even if the Fed were to allow the global supply of dollars to contract,
forcing consumer prices even higher. In fact, a contraction in the domestic
supply of consumer goods will likely coincide with an expansion of the domestic
supply of money. The result will be much higher consumer prices despite the
recession. So even though Americans will consume much less, they will pay much
more for the privilege.
The real risk of course is that the Fed gets more aggressive as it realizes
that the additional credit it is supplying is not flowing where it wants. If
the Fed drops enough money from helicopters it will eventually reverse the
nominal declines in asset prices. Unfortunately, that road leads to hyper-inflation
and disaster. No matter what, even if the Fed succeeds in propping up nominal
asset prices, they can do nothing to sustain their real values. Consumer goods
prices will always rise faster, leaving the owners of those assets poorer no
matter how high their nominal values climb.
The big problem politically is that hyper-inflation may superficially appear
to be the lesser evil. If asset prices are allowed to collapse, ownership of
those assets will pass to our creditors. If instead we repay our debts with
debased currency, we retain ownership of our assets and shift the losses to
our creditors. Since American debtors can vote in U.S. elections and foreign
creditors can not, the choice seems obvious. Of course there are some American
creditors as well, but since they comprise such a small percentage of the electorate,
my guess is that their losses will be seen as acceptable collateral damage.
For a more in depth analysis of the inherent dangers facing the U.S. economy
and the implications for U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book "Crash
Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait to become a casualty yourself. Protect your wealth
and preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best
way to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|
Peter Schiff C.E.O. and Chief Global
Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
Mr.
Schiff is one of the few non-biased investment advisors (not committed solely
to the short side of the market) to have correctly called the current bear
market before it began and to have positioned his clients accordingly. As a
result of his accurate forecasts on the U.S. stock market, commodities, gold
and the dollar, he is becoming increasingly more renowned. He has been quoted
in many of the nations leading newspapers, including The Wall Street Journal,
Barron's, Investor's Business Daily, The Financial Times, The New York Times,
The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Dallas
Morning News, The Miami Herald, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
The Arizona Republic, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Christian Science
Monitor, and has appeared on CNBC, CNNfn., and Bloomberg. In addition,
his views are frequently quoted locally in the Orange County Register.
Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant
with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and
accounting from U.C. Berkley in 1987. A financial professional for seventeen
years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since
January 2000. An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing,
he is a highly recommended broker by many of the nation's financial newsletters
and advisory services.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Euro Pacific
Capital, Inc.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|