|
HITCH - January 2008
The HITCH Update -- (The HAHN Intellectual Tap-dancing & Chicken Heroics
Update)
Quarterly Strategy Comments & Updates - January 2, 2007
Key Considerations & Decision Points: See page 2.
Major Current Investment Themes
- A Stagflation Jungle is here ... perhaps moving to a Survival of the Fleetest
Wealth"
Era.
- Global Economic Slowdown: Consumer Retrenchment in North America
- Monetary Bedlam: Combative Policy Reponses to #2, #5, #7.
- USD: Anticipate a Bottoming Now.
- Liquidity Hoarding Continues (Objective: Safety and Credit Risk).
- Yield and Non-correlated Asset Focus.
- Global real-economy impact of liquidity crisis and insolvencies. Economic
slowdown
- Major global re-inflationary boom: Will it work?
- US Supply-Side Boomlet Revived? 10. Special buying opportunities.
Significant Event (SE) Watch
Significant Events currently being monitored, that are anticipated to
either support or trigger future strategy shifts.
Triggered:
- Tentatively ... a US dollar bottom in sight.
- US households further moving into recession mode.
- Housing downturn (Still ongoing).
- Major credit event watch. (Ongoing and still heightening!)
- Reverse Bond Conundrum in Force (But, temporarily overwhelmed by liquidity
flight.)
- Fed Reaction to 2, 3 & 4 above (Capitulation ... multiple rate cuts
ahead!)
- "Liquidity & Insolvency Watch"
Pending and New:
- US Economy: Recession? (January 2008?)
- US Financial and Economic Coupling with ROW. (Europe next to slow.)
- BRIC Slowdown in 2007
- Counter responses of Euro, Yen and Yuan central banks to USD policy.
- Geopolitical Developments: Russia, China, Iran, Iraq Pull-out Strategy.
- A Wealth Preservation "Velocity Inflation" ahead?
Investment Stance - Key Distinctions
- Cautious: Still Above-average cash levels. Buy quality income.
- Emphasis upon big cap equities.
- Tilting towards a "Stagflation Jungle" scenario.
- High reliance upon non-correlated and quality yield assets.
- Asian currency bloc - fixed-income.
Risk Assessment: (Overall Financial Markets) Remains Above average.
7-Year Return Outlook: Slightly raised but still modest (from CAD base).
Between 4% and 7% per annum (average of balanced portfolios).
Other Strategy Resources: Global Strategy Chart Panorama -- Stagflationary
Jungle
Key Considerations & Decision Points:
Summary: Anticipated Opportunities and Decision Points (1 to 3 year view).
• Bond Trap: Unprecedented drops in interest rates (US government)
have occurred. 10-year yields have fallen from 5.30% to under 4.00% in little
more than 4 months. (A decline of approx. 25%.) Interest rates are now back
down to the low levels of mid-2005 at the height of the USD carry trade.
Normally, such a move would be highly supportive of stock market valuations.
This recent decline however is more a reflection of "flight to quality" concerns.
However, now that inflation is rising, the liquidity flight towards bonds
will likely end up being a value trap.
• The US dollar has probably bottomed. The euro has already well-exceeded
our longrunning minimum upside target of 142.50 against the USD. We expect
a global rebalancing to take place which would likely last for at least a
year. While there remains the possibility that the US dollar could yet face
another emotional downspike this probability is diminishing. After all, USD
has fallen some 50% from its top against the euro. A decisive turn in the
dollar could trigger a rush of portfolio capital back to the US.
• The biggest conundrum for long-time experienced money managers at
the present time is determining the "zeitgeist" of global monetary affairs.
Given the many monetary excesses, grotesque global imbalances and economic
deformations, the classicist would argue that a traditional-style purging
(an old fashioned recession) is long overdue. At the same time, the pork
barrelling politician and pragmatist policymaker cannot risk such an outcome.
We argue that a new era of the Wealth Transmission Model could evolve into
what we call a Stagflationary Jungle -- an environment where the prevailing
challenge is "Survival of the Fleetest Wealth." (See page 9.)
• Why have stock markets not yet succumbed to the overwhelmingly negative
economic news? To date, stock markets in North America remain only 5-6% below
highs. This may already be a symptom of the "Survival of the Fleetest Wealth"
scenario. For reasons we explain, financial capital has stratified and increasingly
become delinked from the real economy. For instance, while real economies and
many households are under strain, art markets (the domain of the well-heeled)
and stagflation hedges such as big cap stocks (primarily bought by institutionalized
capital) remain near highs.
• A "credit revulsion" continues. If so, this dynamic will be the
key determinant of market environments from here forward and could mean that
money velocity declines. We consider 4 scenarios.
• The US economy may already have slipped into a recession. At least
a mild recession is likely in the first two quarters of 2008. However, the
jury is still out as to whether it will be a deep slowdown. There are several
reasons why the recession could be mild: 1. Protracted and unconventional
economic and monetary intervention is likely. 2. The US financial system
will likely be refinanced more quickly than originally thought, thanks to
foreign investors and SWFs. 3. While realestate- related hardships are real
and are the worst in many decades, it is only a small minority of households
that will lose their homes. Most of these didn't have much equity to lose
in the first place. The major financial impact will fall upon banks and non-bank
institutions. In the end, a portion of the global reserves of the surplus
countries may be exchanged for significant ownership of the US and European
wealth management and banking sector.
• A global recoupling is now highly likely. We expect that a US slowdown
will soon be joined by Europe at large. Already, Spain, Ireland and the UK
are experiencing downshifts. Given that 60% of the world economy will face
headwinds, a major impact will fall upon emerging markets, particularly the
BRIC group. Also, we do not expect China to escape the chillier winds. As
a result, emerging market equities are vulnerable at the present time.
• The US consumer sector is under barrage. This will continue to drive
up household savings rates and continue to narrow the US current account
deficit. US retail sales fell 2.7 percent last week (December 12th) from
a year earlier. Sales were pressured by a 12 percent decline in shopper visits
to stores, according to ShopperTrak RCT Corp. Six-month LIBOR determines
the reset rates for an estimated 99% of subprime ARMS and 38% of Alt A ARMs
and LIBOR rates remain high at this time. (A further 1% of subprime and 22%
of Alt A ARMs will be reset based upon 1-year LIBOR rates.) Also, energy
prices remain high. Piscataqua Research Inc. (Consumer Crush- December 2007
Update) recently reports that its Consumer Cash Flow model now has fallen
to an 18.5 day reserve and is still declining. By comparison, at the worst
levels in the 1990-1991 recession, this cash reserve level was at 50 days.
• The next quarters appear to be pivotal. A number of pending and/or
new SEs of a major nature that are expected are listed below. All of these
will have a material impact upon our investment strategies.
- US Economy: Recession or "Soft Landing"?
- US Dollar Bottom
- China: Will a further monetary/graft crack-down work?
- Counter responses of Euro, Yen and Yuan central banks to USD policy.
- Geopolitical Developments: Russia, China, Iran, Iraq Pull-out Strategy.
- Financial Deflation/Unwinding vs. Inflationary Scenario?
- Contagion Watch: Economic decoupling with rest-of-world (ROW).
• Despite our expectation that a slowing economic trend around the
world will take the pressure off industrial commodities for a duration, long-term
secular trends continue to augur for rising commodity prices in general.
Particularly, if world-wide monetary actions become highly stimulative and
the motive of wealth preservation moves to the forefront, hard assets will
be favored.
• An SE that we instituted in March of 2006 remains in force. The
US housing downturn has longer to run. Supply/demand factors, affordability
conditions and a tougher financing environment continue to underline this
conclusion. We therefore continue to monitor real estate trends closely.
• It has been at least refreshing to see a declining US monthly trade
deficit over the past several quarters. However, for now, this development
has a negative lining as it is imports that are falling while exports stay
flat. Such conditions imply a slowing economy ... and, significantly, also
indicate a slowing influence upon the rest of the world.
• Corporate earnings growth is deteriorating, though still remaining
at very high levels. A theoretical approach that we employ suggests slowing
corporate earnings growth over the next few years. Currently, cyclically-adjusted
earnings are at near recordhigh valuations. This in turn implies that equity
returns will also be generally modest over this same period.
• The Canadian dollar remains highly overvalued. Should the US dollar
begin to rally against the euro, we anticipate that the CAD will fall further.
Ultimately, the CAD should be expected to settle back to the 0.85 to 0.88
USD range. During this period, global diversification will be attractive
to Canadians.
• Gold has vindicated itself as an inflation hedge ... at least for
the time being. We continue to hold a core holding for "insurance" purposes." Given
the material probability of an inflationary "wealth velocity inflation" we
must continue to hold an exposure to this asset.
• We have anticipated a move to "supply-side" of North American economy,
preferring to establish these positions during an expected economic downturn.
Instead, a mini
"supply side boomlet" (SSB) has already occurred, as stock markets have not
reacted to economic slowing signals. Actually, cyclical sectors have spurted
over the past year and more. We will keep this theme in reserve, as it will
likely re-emerge as the strongest performing once an economic recovery is again
underway.
• We have modestly lowered cash levels in favor of US large cap stocks.
Yet, cash levels in portfolios remain above average, awaiting further buying
opportunities. Again, we suggest that Canadians should continue to consider
USD cash deposits ... especially given that the CAD has risen further against
the USD. Rotation towards
"big cap" stocks, favoring a higher US equity weight in global portfolios.
We continue to emphasize large "caps" in portfolios.
• Asian currencies have performed admirably in recent weeks. Many
Asian currencies have nowhere to go but up, we still think. We continue to
hold a significant position in Asian bond markets. Market trends this year
have broadly supported our thesis that equity markets overall and high-yielding
deficit currencies are much more vulnerable than those fixed income and currencies
of the Asian surplus countries.
Final Conclusions
We expect that the next quarter will be pivotal. If it proves true that the
bulk of the bad news relating to the global credit crises peaks; that banks
are quickly recapitalized; and that financial markets and economies witness
unprecedented intervention on the part of policymakers, a highly inflationary
or monetarily debasing environment will ensue. At the very minimum, it will
be a stagflationary environment, in which equities will fare best.
Headed Into a New Era?
History is being made.
Firstly, we may be finally discovering the "geo-political" strategies behind
the foreign currency reserve and Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) hordes ... namely,
to buy into Western/Anglo Saxon financial and economic systems. The emergent "surplus
countries" have turned the tables and are now taking their pound of flesh.
The world's economic power balance continues to shift to Asia (inclusive of
the Middle East).
Secondly, never before, have central banks coordinated their resuscitative
activities as in the previous few weeks. Current initiatives on the part of
central banks around the world far exceed the measures instituted during the
Asian crisis period of 1997 to 1998. On December 18th, for example, the European
Central bank injected $348.6 billion euros (roughly one-half trillion CAD!)
into its short-term lending facilities to member banks. Strong actions were
also initiated by the US, British and Canadian central banks. (While these
are large actions, the actual underlying monetary mechanisms are actually more
complex than the headlines reveal.)
The current actions and positioning on the part of financial institutions
and policy makers are exactly as we have anticipated. Dire times for the world's
monetary and credit systems mandate desperate measures as the only acceptable
outcome on the part of domestic and international policymakers.
However, the actions of the SWFs represent a new actor on the world stage.
This, we believe, holds implications for world economic power distribution
as well as equity market trends. All in all, recent credit crises point to
a very confusing environment ahead. It stands to be a tug of war between unwinding
asset bubbles, credit deflation and the efforts of central banks and governments
to forestall their negative effects. This will become ever more clear over
the next few months.
As mentioned, we should expect extraordinary measures on the part of policymakers.
The potential crises in financial systems remains serious at the present time.
The next US election is less than a year away and the pork-barreling will be
in full swing. Already, actions of the past weeks herald the arrival of this
environment. Measures to prop up the banking system ... both through the front
door and the back door such as the FHLB (US Federal Home Loans Bank) extending
billions in loans to bank and mortgage providers ... and direct intervention
in the housing markets have already been announced.
What will happen next? Let's follow the interests of vested money to find
out. Firstly, what about the actions Western policymakers? Lawrence Summers
(Former US Treasury Secretary) makes some poignant observations in an op-ed
column in the Financial Times (November 28, 2007). In view of the unfolding
crises he prescribed three necessary steps. To do otherwise, he says, would
be negligence on the part of US policymakers.
What concrete steps are necessary? First, maintaining demand must be
the over-arching macro-economic priority. That means the Fed has to get
ahead of the curve and recognize - as the market already has - that levels
of the Fed Funds rate that were neutral when the financial system was working
normally are quite contractionary today. As important as longrun deficit
reduction is, fiscal policy needs to be on stand-by to provide immediate
temporary stimulus through spending or tax benefits for low- and middle-income
families if the situation worsens. (Ed. Translation: Keep slashing
interest rates and don't worry about budget deficits.)
Second, policymakers need to articulate a clear strategy addressing the
various pressures leading to contractions in credit. Very likely this will
involve measures that are non-traditional, given how much of the problem
lies outside bank balance sheets. The time for worrying about imprudent
lending is past. The priority now has to be maintaining the flow of credit.
The current main policy thrust - the so-called "super conduit", in which
banks co-operate to take on the assets of troubled investment vehicles
- has never been publicly explained in any detail by the US Treasury. On
the information available, the "super conduit" has worrying similarities
with Japanese banking practices of the 1990s that aroused criticism from
American authorities for their lack of transparency, suppression of genuine
market pricing of bad credits, and inhibiting effect on new lending. Perhaps
there is a strong case for it, but that case has yet to be made. (Ed.
Translation: Get creative in filling in the black holes on the balance
sheets of both banks and non-banks.)
Third, there needs to be a comprehensive approach taken to maintaining
demand in the housing market to the maximum extent possible. The government
operating through the Federal Housing Administration, through Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac, or through some kind of direct lending, needs to assure
that there is a continuing flow of reasonably priced loans to credit worthy
home purchasers. At the same time there need to be templates established
for the restructuring of mortgages to homeowners who cannot afford their
resets, so every case does not have to be managed individually. (Ed.
Translation: Get creative in providing support to the falling housing market.)
Mr. Summer's reflects the practical view that policymakers can simply not
stand by and watch households, financial institutions and real estate markets
sink into the ether and trigger a deep recession. They must at least try to
avert such negative outcomes. And so they will.
Therefore, investors should expect heavy market and economic intervention
in the year ahead. By nature, these interventions must be considered both inflationary
and monetarily debasing. Given the structures and constructs driving the behavior
of financial wealth today, it is very possible that global financial markets
will transition into a new era ... a period we will call a Stagflationary Jungle.
It may even lead to a "Survival of the Fleetest Wealth" scenario in which frightened
capital will shift to tangible assets and "monetary debasement" safe investments.
This would be a form of "velocity inflation."
Whichever of the above scenarios play out, we do believe that the current
market environment is unprecedented and will require some adaptive thinking.
Uppermost Conclusions - Stagflationary Environment Dead Ahead
It is a new day ... a new environment. Investors must quickly acclimatize
themselves to the reality of a stagnationary environment -- modest to slow
economic growth with persistently high inflation. Uppermost, then, two major
bellwethers must be kept in mind as we review the current investment outlook.
1. The world economy (still centered by the US) has entered an inflationary
environment. At the very minimum, a stagflationary environment has begun. This
has major implications for investment policy. We will review the various
scenarios that could yet play out and assign probabilities. Until only recently,
general world consumer price conditions remained disinflation in tone (though
credit and monetary policies were strongly inflationary). Secular developments
such as an emerging Asian manufacturing colossus, rapidly expanding world
trade, outsourcing, and temporarily-successful currency manipulation have
together acted to suppress or offset inflationary conditions in most countries
(Please refer to the Global Spin of November 2007 for a further explanation
of this unique conditions.)
2. Secondly, the structure of fungible world wealth (financial assets) today
is markedly different than at previous global economic inflection points.
A greater proportion of the world's wealth in is in the form of securities
and mobile capital. This is an extension and byproduct of the large role
of non-bank financial sectors today. We have pointed out in the past that
the traditional banking sector today probably represents less that 30% of
the credit creation apparatus. Next, in this context, it is crucial to understand
that this greater amount of fungible capital is managed and commandeered
by a smaller circle of people. Not only is global wealth distribution more
skewed today than probably the entirely of human history, more wealth is
managed in some type of institutional form ... i.e. pension or mutual funds,
sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) or, burgeoning currency reserves funds.
These conditions give rise to a fecund environment for "velocity inflations" in
asset markets as well as stagflationary economic conditions (if not virulent
inflation).
With respect to the latter, such outcomes already appear to be unfolding.
Consumer and commodity price inflation is spurting around the world as of late.
Producer price inflation (finished goods) in the US spiked to a 7.2% rate
year-over-year in November 2007. Consumer price inflation levels both in the
US and Europe are currently well in excess of 3%. China's domestic inflation
levels recently have been reported to be in excess of 6.2%. Similar trends
are being witnessed elsewhere. Yet, though inflation levels may be at the highest
levels of the last 5 to 10 years, many monetary authorities find themselves
in the situation where they must stimulate economies. Assuming that an outright
credit system meltdown does not ensue, inflationary pressures and wellsprings
will continue to percolate.
Let's turn our attention next to what we call asset "velocity inflation." What
do we mean and just how do such conditions come about? To begin, we first review
the various credit scenarios, then explore new investment environment scenarios
with a view to anticipating some crucial investment trends ... some of which
may prove surprising.
Possible Financial-system Scenarios Ahead: The Major Minsky
In
early September 2007, we published a Global Spin that outlined four
possible unfolding scenarios with respect to the ongoing credit crunch at that
time. We called them, Minsky, Mini, Minor or More. The probabilities of each
of these are shown in Table 1 on this page.
At the time, we received some worried feedback. Some respondents thought we
were being too apocalyptic. We had placed a 40% probability on the unfolding
credit inflation at that time to result in a "Mini liquidation." (A full
description of each of these four scenarios can be found in the September Global
Spin. Please visit our website - www.
hahninvest.com.)
We are not always correct in our prognostications. However, we are students
of past credit cycles and understand the capriciousness of what is called "liquidity." Liquidity
is only widely available when few want it and fair-weather optimists see no
reason for any insurance nor can contemplate any accidents. When everyone wants
liquidity at the same time -- like the one toy that has grabbed the attention
of a room full of nursery school kids -- few can have it. There can be no liquidity
if everyone wants it at the same time. That's why central banks want to step
in and make it available when liquidity crises occur. Of course, all of this
becomes much more complicated and intractable when insolvency issues are involved.
Back to the Major Minsky. Events since July of 2007 to the end of 2007 actually
have proven our previous forecasts somewhat optimistic. The credit system as
we know it has indeed hit extremely rough shoals. At this time we are teetering
between scenarios 2A and 2B, as shown in Table 1. Without a doubt, a Mini Minsky
has been playing out to date. Will it yet turn out to a full Minsky? The jury
is out.
What we can conclude with a high degree of certainty, given the graveness
of the unfolding financial problems, is that interventionist policies in the
global financial and economic systems will attain new heights (as already
discussed). A 2B scenario must be avoided by policymakers, if at all possible.
This could lead to an unstable "velocity inflation" ... an outcome that will
result in highly inflationary stock markets (in other words, soaring equity
markets). Let's next consider the likelihood of just such a scenario.
Shifting Investment Environments -- The New Era Wealth Transmission Model
We outline four investment environment regimes in the table on the next page,
along with our probability estimates. Whereas investment markets of the last
10 to 15 years would have been classified under the Post-Modern model, we now
believe that the balance of probabilities has moved fully to the New Era Wealth
Transmission model. Given the specter of recent events (as we have already
described) for the first time we think that the Manic Preservation scenario
(See #4 ... what we also call the Survival of the Fleetest Wealth scenario)
is calling for a meaningful probability. We wager to estimate that this scenario
-- the asset "velocity scenario" to which we have already alluded -- has at
least a 20% chance. That is significant. As such, it behooves us to start hedging
against such a scenario ... even if only partially. Our strategy shifts this
quarter already take into account the rising probability of this scenario.
There are several reasons why we think that such an outcome is becoming ever
more plausible.
Viewing the possible scenarios ahead, it is very likely that investment market
trends will appear to be non-intuitive and surprising. To an extent, this is
already happening. By that we mean that market movements -- particularly equity
markets -- could stand to stump historical theories. Despite negative credit
developments and seemingly gloomy economic news, certain sectors of the equity
market will prosper ... seemingly against all odds. We will explain this perspective
more fully.
It begins with these observations: Significant monetary destruction is occurring
and financial systems are being taxed under both liquidity and insolvency pressures
as perhaps never before. And, world money systems are integrated and coordinated
as never before. There are at least 8 channels through which this occurs. As
such, it is key to realize that the world is facing a global crisis at present,
one that requires a global response. This will be clear soon enough as economic
weakness spreads abroad.
World policy makers will not stand by while Rome burns. The clear and apparent
gravity of current credit crises will drive rapid responses. In one way or
another, money and inflation will be manufactured through monetarism to sufficiently
fill in any black "financial" holes.
Additionally, (and this a new development to which we have already alluded)
a major part of the solution to the past financial follies will be the opportunism
of foreign SWFs.
These extraordinary scenarios will prompt extraordinary responses both on
the part of policymakers and those with capital (or those that manage capital).
The result is that we are entering a post, post-modern world. Financial markets
firmly move into the realm of relativism -- of the "Survival of the Fleetest
Wealth." It now becomes all about relative wealth preservation, a volatile
era of capital flight and refugee wealth which is trying to stay one better
than the mode of the masses. Absolute valuation plays less of a role. Rather,
capital and wealth in motion could create conditions of "velocity inflation." This
is nothing more than money in motion fleeing depreciating currencies and money,
seeking safe haven and relative wealth preservation, and thereby driving up
the relative value of some assets, while collapsing others. A simple way to
think of the effects of "velocity inflation" is the actions of a large crowd
of passengers on a small boat. If they all rush to one side of the boat, one
side will rise, the other will fall. The number of people has not changed,
however, their collected and accelerated actions create motion.

Larger
Image
Structurally, the world of money and securitized assets has a larger role
in the lives of people on this earth than ever before in human history. Secondly,
wealth today is more unevenly distributed than possibly ever before in the
history of mankind. We have quoted supporting research on this condition in
past updates. Just recently, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) published
a report on this topic, entitled Globalization and Inequality, observing
that "inequality has risen in all but the low-income country aggregates
over the past two decades." What this signifies is that there is vastly
more idle wealth today, in a form that is mobile.
A third fact to recognize is that the control of money and wealth is more
centralized than ever before also for structural reasons. The emergence of
funded pension systems, the rapid growth of wealth management services and
government, (and an assortment of other developments) have placed the
fate of world monetary and financial affairs in the hands of a very small cadre
of people.
It is crucial to understand that the actions of the super-wealthy and the
elite money managers are likely to be very different from that of the individual.
Why? While the average household strives to pay bills and debts, people with
significant capital are more concerned about relative wealth and its preservation.
What additional evidence is there that this could happen? Crucially, stock
markets are seeming to already respond to this outcome. For example, stock
markets to this point are refusing to succumb to steep declines. Despite "high
profile" and well recognized news and statistics -- economic, monetary, geopolitical,
systemic and otherwise -- that historically would have signified a death knell
of equity markets, equity markets remain near highs. Why?
We theorize that one reason may be because equities as a class are the best
vehicle to survive an inflationary spiral ... excepting gold and other rare
commodities, of course.
Of the major three asset classes, equities -- the ownership securities underlying
companies -- are well suited to passing on inflationary pressures. While higher
inflation normally has a negative valuation effect upon stock markets (price-earnings
multiples decline) this may be over-ridden if a capital flight to equities
takes place ... at least for a time.
Financial history provides a strong precedent for this outcome. Whenever owners
of capital are faced with inflationary spirals, they will seek to escape to
assets that will experience the least loss of relative wealth. A recent example
of this can be seen in Zimbabwe. While inflation rages at plus-1000 percent
per month, the local equity market soars at a pace that effectively neutralizes
loss of wealth. Could this effect play out on a global scale?
Indeed, we do not expect that inflation will rise to double or triple digit
rates. All the same, we do expect the world's major currencies will continue
to lose their purchasing value and that stagflationary condition will prevail.
Already, shorter-term maturities in bond markets -- a significant asset class
representing upwards of $80 trillion worldwide -- and short-term paper are
yielding negative real rates. While cash provides the safety of liquidity,
at this time it offers no sinecure from the ravages of inflation and depreciating
currencies. Where will the preponderance of the world's managed capital seek
relative wealth preservation?
Besides hard assets such as gold and other non-perishable commodities, equities
are the logical target. Moreover, this asset category is large enough to absorb
much capital.
Large capitalization equities -- global multi-nationals, particularly -- are
the most attractive vehicles in this regard. They have geopolitical clout and
access to capital markets. Such companies can circumvent "blocked" and "constipated" banking
systems. They can issue debt directly to non-bank buyers such as pension funds.
Additionally, they have global mobility and many have world-wide recognition
and brands. In an inflationary world of unstable currencies and tenuous economic
conditions, such companies will engender greater trust than governments and
sovereign fixed-income securities.
Again, all the above gives rise to an investment strategy, that in the face
of currently negative financial news, will seem counter intuitive -- to raise
equity weightings at the expense of cash and bonds even in the face of above-average
valuations and an earnings downturn. This makes sense against government bonds,
particularly, as these have soared lately as liquidity and transparency have
been in demand. As such, bond markets now are likely a trap in view of the
fact that inflation has risen markedly and the real returns are low to negative.
They are overvalued relative to the expected monetary malfeasance, economic
interventionism and price inflation trends that are now beginning to unfold.
Here are some other factors that may play a role in the determining stock
market trends. Some are supportive, others possibly exerting negative influences.
Factors That Are Likely Discounted in Equity Market Levels
-
The American household has not been a committed buyer of equities this
past 18 months. As such, there may be no "weak hands" that will be selling
and forming a deep bottom for the current down phase. Typically, retail
investors are large buyers at late stages of an equity bull market. Not
so to this point.
-
Government fixed-income markets have experienced an upside crash. This
appears to have been more the result of a liquidity and transparency panic,
rather than a discounting of recessionary conditions ahead. Whichever the
case, normally such a drop in interest rates would be supportive of equity
market valuations. While interest rates for non-government sectors have
not declined as much (indeed, some rates have actually risen) this
interest-rate effect is already priced into stock markets.
-
Equity markets to date have absorbed a lot of bad news. Overwhelmingly,
economic news reports and been quite negative. Yet, stock markets have
not entered a traditional bear market period. Could this mean that most
of the downside is completed? Or, does it infer that stock markets have
yet to align with the economic and financial outlook?
-
The impact of a weak US dollar upon foreign buyers. Foreign buying of
US equities (and other assets) is impacted by a chronically weak dollar.
This may no longer be negative if the US dollar indeed does begin to rally.
-
Private equity, LBOs, share buybacks and takeover activities have caused
outstanding equities to decline in recent years. This would have caused
an upward influence upon stock markets. Currently, due to the credit crisis,
takeover and private equity demand has collapsed (a negative influence).
-
Markets already anticipate an earnings decline.
New Changing Factors Yet to be Realized
Sovereign Wealth Funds have emerged as buyers of assets other than AAA bonds
and fixed income instruments. Recently, the Abu Dhabi Investment Board injected
$7.5 billion into Citibank. Could this support US equity prices? Yes. However,
this source of demand in reality could not avert a US bear market. There
is approximately $2 trillion SWFs today. Perhaps, only 25% (certainly
not more) could be mobilized if there were a fire sale on US assets.
This would amount to around 1% or so of current US equity market value. The
deep pockets of SWFs and surplus nations are coming to play a role in refinancing
the lost capital of the US (an other) financial sector. As such, this
opportunistic capital could serve to truncate downside risks for the US equity
market.
Currencies and stock market trends are normally inversely correlated.
(Impact upon earnings translations, exports, lower import competition ...
etc.) A rising US dollar in this respect would undermine US equity
markets.
Should the US dollar stop falling, foreign buyers will likely perceive value (certainly
so in relation to other assets in other countries) and begin buying.
This would be a positive and sizable force on the US stock market.
There are reasons to suggest that a monetary inflation will further exacerbate
the currently-wide wealth skew in America and elsewhere. As such, this inflationary/monetary
boom (whatever its form) will more likely find a channel into financial
assets than into consumption. As the world of elite investors runs away from
depreciating currencies, assets such as commodities and equities of MNCs
will prosper, though hardly seeming to be reasonable value. However, this
latter point would miss the point. These assets will rise in value simply
because there are no other viable alternatives.
The Current Credit Imbroglio - Destruction and High Credit Growth
For the time being, we see that a strange phenomenon is unfolding in the financial
world. Credit and debt growth is booming and inflation is flaring upward. Total
credit growth (both financial and non-financial) accelerated to 11.1% in the
3Q of 2007 from a pace of 8.6% the previous quarter. (Federal Reserve, Flow
of Funds Report, Z1)
What indeed makes this strange is that supposedly there is an ongoing credit
crunch at this time. Credit supply, primarily for new mortgages, is crimping
households who wish to either renew or refinance their mortgages. The interbank
lending market -- witness the high LIBOR rates, even as administered rates
have fallen to new lows -- also signals tight credit markets. Then why is credit
still growing? Shouldn't credit growth be slowing down at a time like this?
Certainly outstanding asset-backed paper (ABCP) is collapsing. Given all of
these extenuating conditions, wouldn't deflation eventually rear its head?
Yes ... and no. To begin, we are witnessing some short-term effects. In effect,
we now are experiencing a time of credit destruction ... in other words, real
destruction of capital on the liability side of the bank and non-bank financial
system (financial balance sheets). For the time being this is not being reflected
in financial reporting. Impaired capital has yet to be totally realized or
written off. Instead, for the time being, what is happening is that many financial
institutions are taking onto their balance sheets the assets of some of their
defunct non-bank subsidiaries ... namely SIVs (Special Investment Vehicles,
bailouts of funds holding assetbacked paper, perhaps high-yield money-market
funds that have "broken the buck" or taking back bad mortgages for which they
are the servicer. The effect of these desperate measures is the expansion of
the respective banks's balance sheet.
For example, recently, Citigroup Inc. decided to consolidate $49 billion in
off-balance sheet vehicles (including SIVs) and in the process will be assuming
$59 billion of new debt. Other major banks have decided to move similar assets
onto their balance sheets. Why? They had the option of closing down the fund
and liquidating the assets, or bailing out the SIV. It needed to do this as
its assets were under water and the short-term funding obligations were coming
due. Which of these options is the better choice? Liquidating the assets would
have caused fire-sale conditions as there are no bids for many of the SIV's
holdings. At worst, such fire-sale activities would have depressed asset prices
further, in turn triggering larger losses and in the process causing it to "mark
to market" other assets of a similar type that it might have held. This would
be disastrous, most certainly wiping out all of its tangible equity capital
and having knockon effects for other financial institutions that are holding
the same types of assets.
The SIV funding problems are not over. Another salvo will occur when medium-term
notes (MTN) issued to fund SIV holdings come due. Desdner Kleinwort analysts
recently estimated that some $180 billion of such funding comes due by October
2008, which currently represent approximately 65% of funding.
The net outcome is that credit growth will likely remain high at least into
the middle of the next year, as both banks and non-banks refinance losses and
reposition their portfolios.
The Bottom for the US Dollar: Another Significant Event?
Currencies trends are notoriously difficult to predict over the near-term.
Nevertheless, we think that it is very likely that the US dollar may have seen
its bottom. We postulate a number of factors that at least could lead to a
bounce in the USD ... if not a rally lasting as much as 1 to 2 years. What
will contribute to this turnaround?
Firstly, negativism on the US dollar could not be more black. Expectations
for the US dollar, a discredited and much maligned currency recently, are universally
low. How black can sentiment yet become?
The US dollar has already fallen some 50% and more (top to bottom) against
the euro. Would it be reasonable to expect it to fall another 10 % ... 20%?
As it is, Europe has been experiencing a double-whammy. Not only has the euro
fallen against the US dollar, but also against many Asian currencies, notably
the Chinese Yuan.
In the meantime, relative conditions are beginning to shift for the US dollar.
In due time, it will soon become more obvious as to why the dollar should again
be rising against the euro. Significantly, US imports are now declining ...
in fact, possibly even faster than the (ex ante) capital account. This argues
that the major world imbalance represented by the large trade and current account
deficits of the US could begin to contract ... albeit slowly. The major influence
on the US trade deficit currently is high energy volumes and prices. Already,
the US current account deficit has begun to shrink relative to US GDP.
It is important to grasp the significant leverage of such a shift. Currently,
the US trade deficit approximates 6.5% of US GDP. US GDP represents 26-27%
of world GDP. As such, US excess demand is stimulating Rest of World GDP by
2-3% per year, not to mention the sizable impact upon currency reserve accumulation
in surplus countries. Therefore, should the US deficit contract (and also,
considering all of the multiplier effects that are involved) the slowing
effect upon world growth is potentially very large. Even China would be impacted
at the margin.
Also, as a credit crunch worsens, demand for USD dollars could rise. Another
factor that will cause the US dollar to again move upward is a concerted repatriation
of foreign portfolio investments back into the US. In recent years, US investors
have moved heavily into foreign investments, including emerging markets. Once
the dollar again begins to rise, and slowing economic conditions spread to
the rest of the world, stalling stock markets abroad will prompt capital to
move back. As such, a self-reinforcing process could be in play for a time.
The same would apply to US fixed-income investments. Presently, they have become
increasingly unattractive to global investors (whether sovereign nations or
private investors) as the USD has fallen sharply. The exact inverse will occur
when the dollar again moves upwards.
According to the Investment Company Institute, American investors directed
10 times the money to foreign equity funds than US domestic stock funds over
the pastq8 months. And, for 2006 as a whole, this ratio was 13 times in favor
of foreign equities. In recent years, institutional investors have also raised
allocations to foreign investments.
A declining US dollar is also reinforced by private investors. A good asymmetric
bet is never to be overlooked and unappreciated. In time, such a situation
invariably becomes the material of self-fulfilling action. A declining dollar
boosts returns on overseas investments (thanks again to currency translation
effects) therefore attracting more investment and contributing to a lower
US dollar. It becomes a macro momentum trade. The vulnerability in this situation
lies in the fact that "private money" is fickle and pro-cyclical, not counter
to the market trend. In the case of the US dollar, private investment outflows
have been a juggernaut in recent years ... calculated to be over $1.5 trillion
last year alone. This sets up the possibility of short-term vulnerability.
While it may be difficult at this point to outline a scenario arguing for a
robust US dollar for the next decade, it does leave open the possibility that
the US dollar could soar ... and rapidly ... and very dangerously.
Finally, the current credit crunch is a global affair and appears to be much
more acute in Europe than in America. An economic slowdown is likely in Europe
and already seems to be in tow in Britain, Spain and Ireland. Overall, this
expectation does not yet appear to be reflected in currency markets. All in
all, we suspect that the US dollar has seen its low.
This supports our shift away from Europe (and Canada) back into a overweighted
position in US equities.
Updated Expected Returns: Our expected return forecasts for our portfolios
have been revised this quarter. While market returns may have been ameliorated
due to developing economic recession perhaps being on the horizon. On the other
hand, given the rising Canadian dollar, future foreign investment returns have
improved. Return expectations remain modest for the next 7 years.
All long-term return projections for all portfolio mandates are based upon
7-year real and nominal returns. (For further information, please see the
corresponding exhibits at the back of this report.)
(Forecast revised
as of December 3, 2007)
Long-term Investment Strategy Summary - Changes
For specific portfolio strategy details, please see internal minutes or contact
HAHN Investment.)




|