|
The National Association of Realtors released results stating sales actually
rose .04% (statistically significant?), but were down 20% from last year with
prices down across the board. The Times Online is reporting Shiller
Says America could plunge into Japan-Style Recession.
"Losses
arising from America's housing recession could triple over the next few years
and they represent the greatest threat to growth in the United States, one
of the world's leading economists has told The Times.
Robert Shiller, Professor of Economics at Yale University, predicted that
there was a very real possibility that the US would be plunged into a Japan-style
slump, with house prices declining for years.
Professor Shiller, co-founder of the respected S&P Case/Shiller house-price
index, said: "American real estate values have already lost around $1 trillion
[£503 billion]. That could easily increase threefold over the next
few years. This is a much bigger issue than sub-prime. We are talking trillions
of dollars' worth of losses."
He said that US futures markets had priced in further declines in house
prices in the short term, with contracts on the S&P Shiller index pointing
to decreases of up to 14 per cent.
"Over the next five years, the futures contracts are pointing to losses
of around 35 per cent in some areas, such as Florida, California and Las
Vegas. There is a good chance that this housing recession will go on for
years," he said."
My take: I believe that my blog's readers are considerably above average
in financial acumen and common sense. The NAR is simply not an entity to be
taken too seriously, due to the obvious conflict of interest exemplified by
their ex-economist, David
Lereah, who published some of the most absurd BS I have ever seen come
from a nationally reknown organization. Examples of his work from Wikipedia: Are
You Missing the Real Estate Boom?: Why Home Values and Other Real Estate Investments
Will Climb Through The End of The Decade, And How to Profit From Them was
published in February 2005 at just about the tippy top of the bubble (that
takes some talent). One year later in February 2006, as the market is
already on it's way down, Lereah retitled his book Why the Real Estate Boom
Will Not Bust and mHow You Can Profit from It. Lereah's previous book The
Rules for Growing Rich: Making Money in the New Information Economy touting
investment in technology company equities was published in June 2000 at
the onset of the collapse of the dot-com
bubble. This extreme cheerleading has died down substantially, but the
overly optimistic spin is still evident with their new economist, Lawrence
Yun.
Mr. Shiller, is a different story, though. He is to be taken seriously and
has no such conflicts that I can see. BUT (there always is a but, isn't there?),
you should know what it is you are looking at when you stare at his numbers.
In September of last year (Happy New Year, everybody) I cautioned about misreading
the numbers from the Case-Shiller index (see The
Real Trend in US Housing Prices...).
The
Case Shiller index, although an econometric marvel (it is uncannily accurate
for what it intends to do), does not capture the true essence of the housing
downturn. It uses something called the "repeat sales methodology" for detached/semi-detached
single family, owner occupied homes. This means that to be included in the
index, the house would have had to be sold in an arm's length transaction more
than once. It also takes pains to only include owner occupied detached/semi-detached
homes. That excludes:
-
new construction - hence all of the homebuilder's heavily discounted inventory
sold is not counted,
-
it excludes condos (where the biggest drops in price are to be found),
-
it excluded multi-family units (those that thought rental income would
save them),
-
and it excludes investment properties and flips (again, where much of
the damage is done).
Trust me, the Shiller index actually makes things look pretty compared to
what is actualy going on out there. I use a proprietary guage that starts with
the Shiller-based futures but adds back all of the stuff above (with a slight
tweak for futures markets tend to overshoot the mark), and it has proven to
be much more realistic. This is how I forecast values for the homebuilders
and banks, see Ryland
Group Summary Update for a summary example.

|