|
"We need to stay cool and send positive signals...I repeat: We shouldn't
create alarm." - Joaquin Almunia, European commissioner for monetary
affairs, interviewed by Der Spiegel, Jan 27th
JEROME KERVIEL, fast-overtaking John Law as France's worst-ever financial
mishap, claimed on his most recent resumé to enjoy judo and sailing,
as well as running up $7.1 billion in losses for his employers in his spare
time.
Something of a loner according to the world's media (only 11 friends on Facebook
- can you imagine!), he's also been called a "computer genius" by his colleagues
at Société Générale in Paris.
But that genius earned him a mere €100,000 last year - "peanuts in the
banking world" as the British press puts it. What gives?
Kerviel studied economics at Nantes and then Lyon (one of France's top 10
universities), before joining SocGen as a back-office drone in 2000. He worked
on risk-control and security systems for two years, before graduating to Trading
Assistant (a.k.a. middle-office drone) on the European equities desk, plugging
numbers into SocGen's stock-market derivative positions.
"He spoke very little, answering questions with nothing more than a yes or
a no," whispers a colleague, aghast. Behind the weirdo stare, however, this
low-grade bean-counter was in fact a criminal mastermind - or so everyone says
- bent on gambling three times SocGen's entire stock-market cap by "hacking
through four separate fire-walls" according to French finance minister Christine
Lagarde.
Monsieur Kerviel then chose "very specific operations which didn't involve
any cash movements...placing transactions which did not require immediate confirmation" from
senior management, says Jean-Pierre Mustier, head of corporate & investment
banking at SocGen.
Judging by the public statements of SocGen's management, Kerviel also kept
a white fluffy cat and hid a fish-tank stocked with piranhas just below the
trap-door in his hallway. "The nature of his fictitious and fraudulent operations
were constantly evolving," pleads Daniel Bouton, SocGen's CEO, in an interview
with Le Figaro.
"And when the control systems detected an anomaly, he managed to convince
control officers that it was nothing more than a minor error."
Sacre bleu! This sad loner was able to fool all of the people pretty much
all of the time, including the time when SocGen's risk-management team got
down to scrutinizing his book. They'd even been alerted by Eurex - the European
derivatives exchange - that something was more than a little amiss with Kerviel's
positions.
Didn't the 2,600 people apparently working in "risk management" at France's
second largest bank bother to dig deeper? Ahhh...but Kerviel was a criminal
genius, remember. Everybody says so. Albeit a criminal genius stuck in bean-counting
roles for six years who managed to scrape barely half the average stock-trader's
salary when he finally got a trading position.
It could have happened anywhere, or so everyone agrees - even if Kerviel did
lack the brains and balls to really get ahead in the competitive, cocky world
of financial trading.
On the other side of the trade, meantime - and protecting the world's investors
and savers from the skew-eyed evil geniuses working Excel spread-sheets at
French investment banks - sit the regulators. You might think they're too busy
already keep up with today's brightest financial brains. But just wait until
the politicians are finished trying to cover their own derrieres.
"We have to put a stop to this financial system which is out of its mind and
which has lost sight of its purpose," spat French president Nicholas Sarkozy
on a trip to India last weekend.
"The point of a financial system is to lend money for economic activities,
which, in turn, generate profits. It is not to go and speculate on different
activities which create enormous flows and profits in a few hours."
Oh really? Just what does Monsieur Le President think derivatives are used
for today - creating economic value through prudent lending? Jerome Kerviel
struggled to make $150,000 a year in a job that regularly pays nearer $300,000
plus year-end bonus. Even when the authorities at Eurex queried his trading,
the "risk management professionals" at SocGen fell for his schtick (it seems)
and missed the sheer size of the positions he'd built up.
Either that, or they did know what was happening...and the rumors of a €300,000
bonus ($447,000) if Kerviel's high-risk model paid off are more than just chatter.
It's not just the high-octane world of derivatives tom-foolery that's bamboozling
government regulators and their elected bosses, however. "The failure of Northern
Rock, while primarily a failure of its directors, was also a failure of its
regulator," reckons John McFall, the UK member of parliament who's just led
an official inquiry into Britain's first banking run in 130 years.
"We propose the creation of a new post of Deputy Governor of the Bank of England
and Head of Financial Stability," his report concludes - seemingly unaware
that the BoE already has a deputy governor responsible for financial stability.
Sir John Gieve was appointed Deputy Governor in Jan. 2006, with specific responsibility
for the Bank's Financial Stability work.
Ah, but "the deputy governor should be someone with senior banking experience," counters
Michael Fallon, another member of the Northern Rock inquiry. "You can't have
someone like Gieve, a civil servant without any banking experience."
So who would you expect to hire instead? A senior banker looking to lose all
his Facebook friends by stamping on their business models in between rounds
of golf? Gieve is the perfect man for the job of monitoring financial stability,
anyway, because what he does have is bureaucratic experience. In spades.
A career policy-wonk from the age of 24, Gieve really showed his own talents
as Permanent Secretary to what used to be called the Home Office. (After it
lost three political chiefs in only five years, the Justice Ministry as it's
now known underwent something of a re-branding.) It was entirely "unfit for
purpose" claimed one of the hot seat's brief incumbents - and running the department
day-to-day was Gieve's responsibility.
Indeed, the man now charged with over-seeing the UK's financial stability
seemed to have real trouble with his Excel spread-sheets back at the Home Office.
"Accounts contained numerous errors and internal inconsistencies," said the
official auditor's report in Jan. 2006. He refused to sign off the Home Office's
internal accounts for the last year of Gieve's tenure.
"In particular, amounts relating to cash, Exchequer funding and non-retainable
income...were contradictory and did not reconcile between the different places
in which they appeared in the accounts," the auditor stated.
"There were also material omissions and misstatements, for example the value
of the private prison estate was incorrectly recorded in the accounts."
Sir John is no accountant, however. That's why he nabbed a deputy guv'nor-ship
at the Bank of England three weeks before the auditor's report on his Home
Office accounts was released. Just the man for the job!
"It is clear that the distinctions between different types of financial institution
- banks, securities firms and insurance companies - are becoming increasingly
blurred," announced Gordon Brown on taking office as UK finance minister in
May 1997. Now enjoying the slings and arrows that go with being prime minister, "there
is a strong case for bringing the regulation of banking, securities and insurance
under one roof," he concluded back then, axing the Bank of England's supervisory
role and giving it to a new 'super regulator' that would become the Financial
Services Authority three years later.
Yes, the very same Financial Services Authority that failed in its duty to
monitor and regulate Northern Rock.
"Is the creation of a such a regulator feasible," asked The Banker magazine
in June 1997. "Will it necessarily be more effective, and should it be attached
to the central bank? In a business dependent on trust and confidence why abandon
a well respected institution in the hope that a less prestigious one will do
better?"
Even the head of the Bank of England, "Steady" Eddie George himself (BA Cambs;
career central banker; no private-sector banking experience whatsoever), found
it hard to bite his tongue, despite winning independence on setting interest
rates within one week of Gordon Brown (PhD Edin; career politician, plus a
brief stint as lecturer & journalist; no banking or business experience
whatsoever) becoming Chancellor of the Exchequer.
"Former BoE supervisors have expressed concern over whether credibility could
be maintained in a single institution which is responsible for both the mis-selling
of pensions and systemic risk," The Banker magazine went on.
"And BoE governor, Eddie George, has warned that the new and expanded [regulator]
risks becoming over-bureaucratic and too inflexible in taking a one-size-fits-all
approach to financial regulation.
"Other have worried over how the BoE staff, and the culture they bring with
them, will blend into the new 'super-SIB' structure. Some fear the different
purposes of regulation will themselves become blurred within a single organisation."
British readers might find all this...written almost 11 years ago...wearisomely
familiar. The looming collapse of Northern Rock's aggressive short-term borrowing
model was utterly missed by the Financial Services Authority last summer, even
as the global credit crunch bit. It was left to the current BoE governor, Mervyn
King (PhD Cambs; career academic; no private-sector banking experience whatsoever)
to warn - vaguely - of the risks to stability posed by the UK's record credit
binge.
But as Helen Liddell, then economic secretary to the Treasury, put it in May
1997, re-arranging the UK's regulatory structures was just a "management issue" which
would be solved.
And government can resolve anything it chooses, right? Most especially the
multi-trillion international financial markets...where the world's brightest
brains sweat bullets trying to turn a quick buck even quicker.
|