|
"...Rising inflation in the cost of living didn't stop the Old Lady cutting
interest rates in 2001, 2003 or 2005. Why change now...?"
WILL THE BANK of ENGLAND cut UK interest rates this Thursday?
Might Hillary and Barack have trouble getting together as running mates for
November?
First up, the Bank of England's sole purpose in life is to target inflation.
And annual inflation in United Kingdom real estate prices is now slowing far
beneath the apparently magic 9% mark...

Whatever econometric model says 9% annual house-price growth is vital to the
nation's well-being, the Old Lady has stuck to it since she gained "operational
independence" back in May 1997.
And now falling inflation demands a rate cut...if by inflation you mean the
decade-long bubble in real estate prices.
Check!
Next up, political pressure. The Bank of England is entirely independent of
the elected government, of course, despite the policy team being appointed
by the chancellor himself. And yet the Treasury has displayed an uncanny knack
for second-guessing how the nine-member committee will vote.
"It has not gone unnoticed that the most successful forecaster of changes
in [BoE] policy direction since 1997 has been Mr Ed Balls," as Stephen Lewis
at Insinger de Beaufort wrote of the Treasury's chief economic advisor two
years ago. "Before each of these events, he pops up on a public platform to
approve the shift in advance. His insight into what is supposed to be an independent
decision-making process is remarkable."
Fast forward to last month, and Ed Balls - now in charge of education - seems
to have retained his magical powers of foresight, revealing live on breakfast
TV that "our interest rates are low and are coming down."
Spooky, no?
"The Bank of England has got flexibility," Balls went on. "Inflation is low.
We will see what happens in the next few months."
Won't we just! But not before the current chancellor, hapless Alistair Darling
himself, sets the stage for a rate-cut, too.
"Because of the fact that we now have low unemployment," said the hopeless
one at the end of January, "[and] we've got historically low inflation, low
levels of interest rates and mortgage rates, the Monetary Policy Committee
has room for maneuver."
Room for maneuver? Put another way - as the only US academic on the Old Lady's
team did late last month - "worrying about inflation at this time seems like
fiddling while Rome burns.
"The evidence from the housing market, and especially the commercial property
market, is worrying," David Blanchflower gushed. "Consumer confidence is low
in the UK. Interest rates are restrictive at their current levels and that
is why I have been voting for cuts."
Poor Mervyn King! The Old Lady's chief pooh-bah stuck out like a sore thumb
by refusing to slash rates when Northern Rock collapsed last summer. He's previously
complained that "people in sensitive positions" shouldn't speak out on base-rate
policy.
But then, people in sensitive positions are there because they like to decide
what happens.
And everyone knows the Bank of England simply MUST cut interest rates...because
its sole task is to defend "price stability".
"Mortgage approvals in December at 73,000 were below the lowest point in the
2004-5 housing pause and point to further housing weakness," writes David Smith
in the Sunday Times. "Consumers are cautious and so is business. The CBI said
January retail trading was the weakest for 15 months. Consumer confidence did
not improve as much as it normally does between December and January, and remains
weak."
Never mind that a new survey from Citigroup-YouGov says the Great British
public now expects inflation to reach 3.3% from the last survey's 2.7% - "well
above the 2% official target" as Smith admits.
Rising inflation in the cost of living didn't prevent the Bank of England
from cutting interest rates in 2001, 2003 or 2005. Why should the Old Lady
break the habit of her (independent) lifetime now?
|