|
Though vehemently denied by all and sundry in officialdom, there are many
in financial markets who will tell you that the decision taken suddenly in
1999 by UK Chancellor Culpability' Brown, with the endorsement of Sir Eddie
the Unready George, to dump roughly 400 tonnes of Britain's precious reserves
of gold at what was then a 20-year (and is now a 24-year) low of just under 157/oz,
was not some rational act of 'portfolio management', but rather a deliberate
attempt to cap prices until enough metal could be transferred to all those
bullion banks - and their central bank backers - holding wildly overstretched
short-positions.
As Reg Howe of Golden Sextant put it in his legal complaint against
the Bank for International settlements for this very act of price fixing - a
case, incidentally, never defeated, but only dismissed on the technicality
that Howe was not the party who had been damaged by any such operation and
so was not eligible to file the suit:
'Edward A. J. George, Governor of the Bank of England and a director of
the BIS, to Nicholas J. Morrell, Chief Executive of Lonmin Plc:
"We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise
would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken
down all the rest in their wake. Therefore at any price, at any cost, the
central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult
to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded. The U.S. Fed
was very active in getting the gold price down. So was the U.K."'
In an even more infamous
remark made the year before this alleged exchange - and ironically just
before LTCM nearly blew up the whole of Wall Street - Fed Chairman Greenspan,
too, assured his listeners no harm could eventuate from the swelling numbers
of unregulated derivatives in existence and that nor could 'private counterparties
restrict supplies of gold.... where central banks stand ready to lease gold
in increasing quantities should the price rise'.
Moreover, in February of this year, Antonio Fazio, the head of the Banc d'Italia
told a London audience.
'In a system that rests basically on fiduciary money, the principles of
free trade and comparative advantage typical of trade in manufactures have
sometimes been extended unquestioningly to movements of financial capital.'
Which, in English, means it's all very well opening borders to trade, but
not to unlimited quantities of hot paper money all chasing the latest vogue.
'Reflection on the mistakes made and the need to limit and rectify the
adverse effects on the stability of intermediaries, to protect savings and
to restore conditions for a recovery in output have prompted the monetary
authorities of the industrial countries to establish more extensive and closer
cooperation among themselves?and with the developing countries,'
continued Fazio.
A particularly bold assertion of the truth of widespread collusion to rig
markets being undertaken, you will perforce agree, But who was the driving
force behind this, do you think?
'The Governor of the Bank of England, Sir Edward George, plays a leading
role in this new phase of international monetary cooperation that we could
say began with the meeting of the Group of Seven leading industrial countries
in Toronto in February 1995, shortly after the Mexican crisis erupted.'
It should be noted that the rescue of those caught in this so-called Tequila
Crisis is increasingly recognised as being the event that induced financial
market participants - knowing this 'monetary co-operation' could be relied
upon to bail them out from any penalties of their future excesses - to unleash
the mania which was to become the Bubble upon us.
In fact, so wondrously successful has this heroic co-operation been, that
it has seen most of Asia, Russia, Poland, Turkey and Latin America blow up
since, together with most of the developed world's media, telecom, technology
and power industries, while stripping the heart out of pensions and insurance
companies everywhere and fostering a near global property and consumer credit
boom of dangerous proportions.
Not a bad legacy for the now-retired Sir Eddy and his can't-be-shifted-with-a
stick-of-dynamite buddy 'Sir' Alan Greenspan!
[Then again, as Jim Rogers scathingly put it in his fabulous Odyssey, 'Adventure
Capitalist': Greenspan - a man with a 'long, long history of failure
- did not quit graciously when his last term of office expired because
he 'knew he could not get another job' and was not, in any case, 'really
smart enough to have realized the damage he was causing.']
But what is the point of all these ruminations and why bring all this up now?
Well, it's just that Wednesday saw the Sterling price of gold hit 236/oz - some
50% above the lowest price the Bank achieved in its crash sales programme and
nearly 30% above the average price of roughly 184/oz achieved in the course
of the seventeen auctions subsequently held.
That means that Brown and George between them managed to sell a decent chunk
of our patrimony for a cool ?660 million less than it would have fetched today - enough
for these grandstanding Collectivists to pay, say, 30,000-odd teachers' annual
salaries, or to fund around nine-tenths of a Dear Leader vanity project like
the fatuous Millennium Dome!
By printing money themselves, and by alternately inveigling and turning a
blind eye to the financial Big Guns' drive to distort prices and to force capital
where it has no business going, the central bankers can keep the plates spinning
for what seems like a very long time indeed, but, eventually, gravity wins
- and they fall.
Mr Market may be bound, gagged and chained to a basement radiator for long
years at a stretch, but eventually he comes stumbling out into the sunlight,
turning his captors' dreams to dust.
Gold - and Silver and Platinum, too, if Wednesday's price action is any guide - may
be about to show up the hollowness of the bankers' schemes and to reveal finally
the vast scope of the hitherto partly hidden inflation they have engineered,
into the bargain.
And if that happens, be under no illusions: it will dramatically change the
outlook for us all.
|