|
My first post on my brand new blog about 6 momths ago started with a warning
about the commercial real estate market and obscenely low cap rates. A few
months later I revisited the topic with a couple of anecdotal posts...
I then noticed how the mainstream media and blogs started to catch on...
Then I decided to share my proprietary research on a particular REIT and its
market...
- The Commercial Real
Estate Crash Cometh, and I know who is leading the way!
- Generally Negative
Growth in General Growth Properties - GGP Part II
- General Growth Properties & the
Commercial Real Estate Crash, pt III - The Story Gets Worse
- More on GGP: A Granular
View of Insider Selling and Lease Rate Growth
- GGP part 5 - The
Comprehensive Analysis is finally here
- My Response to the
GGP Press Release, which seems to respond to blogs...
- For those who were
wondering what sparked that silly press release from GGP...
- GGP: Foreclosure
vs Asset Sale
- GGP Refinancing
Sensitvity Analysis
- GGP part 7 - Share
value under the foreclosure analysis
- GGP part 8 - The
Final Anaysis: fire sale of prime properties
It appears that now, the price movement in CRE and CMBS is unmistakeably negative.
To begin with, it takes money to buy buildings and when you buy buildings you
increase demand which drives prices up. This has happened fervently for the
last four or five years, driving prices high and cap rates low. So, what happens
when you can't find the money to buy the buildings anymore? I'm an equity/real
estate guy, but I do look around and ask questions on the fixed income side
every now and then.
Below is a chart of the AAA cmbs index. The spread is out to around +280.
I am told that these are around a seven year duration security, with each 100
bps eqauting to about 7 points (very roughly). This index was +80 one year
ago, and +280 is a loss of around 15 points off of par (100).
Additionally this is the top of the heap in terms of quality.

This is the A rated stuff. This equates to $55 - $60 dollar price according
to the bond traders. Think about it, and investment grade security losing that
much of its value.

I looked at teh BBB and BB charts at markti.com and they look so steep as
to be unreal.
The GGP links above in the beginning of this post are well researched and
should make very clear where the underlying is headed. GGP is not the only
REIT/investor in a bind. So who has this stuff on their books? See Bear
Stearns, Morgan
Stanley, Ambac
and MBIA - to start with. In the case of Bear Stearns:
Deal Type |
Min Rating |
Total |
CMBS |
A |
$227,477,273 |
| |
AA |
$83,459,000 |
| |
AAA |
$466,812,629 |
| |
B |
$21,524,000 |
| |
BB |
$80,214,000 |
|
BBB |
$427,298,000 |
CMBS Total |
CMBS Total |
$1,306,784,902 |
This is not a comprehensive glimpse of BSCs holdings, only about 25% of it,
as insured by the two major monolines. They also have a very large chunk of "unidentified" securities
which I think sports a very significant contigent of CMBS derivatives.
Add this to their other real estate related holdings then apply the marks
that you see in the charts above and you have quite a few billion dollars of
writedowns coming down the pike...

The actual underlying indexes are showing losses as well... From the MIT
site.
MIT's commercial property price index shows its second straight quarterly
decline
Indicates seven percent drop in commercial property since summer
February 5, 2008
The value of U.S. commercial real estate owned by big pension funds fell another
5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, according to an index produced by
the MIT Center for Real Estate.
The drop in the quarterly transaction-based index (TBI), which tracks the
price at which big pension funds buy and sell properties like shopping malls,
apartment complexes and office towers, was the second straight quarterly decline.
It was deeper than the 2.5 percent drop in the third quarter, and it means
the cumulative fall since last year's midsummer peak is now more than 7 percent.
"This is evidence that the commercial property market continued to fall, and
at an accelerated rate, through the last quarter of 2007, no doubt due to the
effects of the credit crunch," said MIT Center for Real Estate Director David
Geltner.
The TBI, based on properties sold from the National Council of Real Estate
Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF) data base, grew 64 percent from 2004 through
2006, then had another 8 percent spurt in the first half of 2007. The decline
in the second half of 2007 still leaves commercial property prices at their
level of a year ago, a level that was considered historically high at the time.
"If this is as far as it goes, the price decline we see so far in commercial
property as reflected in the TBI may simply represent a correction of the froth
that occurred in early 2007 as a result of very aggressive commercial mortgage
underwriting practices," said Geltner.
The TBI measure of total returns for the year 2007 was 3.7 percent, which
simply reflected operating income, with prices basically unchanged. Despite
the upsurge in the first half of the year, this was the poorest calendar year
annual performance for the index since 1992, when commercial property experienced
its worst crash since the Great Depression. Index Co-Director Henry Pollakowski
was quick to point out, however, that fundamentals in the commercial property
market are much stronger now than they were in 1992.
"We don't have the kind of over-building we had then, and building occupancies
and rents are much stronger. Commercial mortgage default rates are much lower
than in the early 1990s," Pollakowski said.
The MIT Center's TBI is based on prices of NCREIF properties sold each quarter
from the property database that underlies the NCREIF Property Index (NPI),
and also makes use of the appraisal information for all of the more than 5,000
NCREIF properties. Such an index--national, quarterly, transaction-based, and
by property type--had not been previously constructed prior to MIT's development
of it in 2006. NCREIF supported development of the index as a useful tool for
research and decision-making in the industry.
While the NCREIF properties well represent institutional investments such
as pension funds, a second index based on a broader population of properties
was subsequently developed at the MIT Center for Real Estate. That index, now
published by Moody's Investor Services as the Moody's/REAL Commercial Property
Price Index, will release its 4th-quarter results later this month. While the
TBI represents pension funds' sales, the Moody's/REAL Index represents the
broader commercial property market and includes a monthly national commercial
property index.
|