|
Originally published February 12th, 2008
Like frightened rabbits scurrying back to the apparent safety of their hutches,
investors rattled by the sub-prime shocks and the associated tremors in stockmarkets
have been fleeing to the perceived safety of Treasury Bonds and Notes. The
bad news is that this time the poacher knows where the rabbits are hiding and
rabbit stew is on the menu tonight.
Let's just stop and think about this for a moment - just what is a Treasury
Bond? - it is a piece of paper telling you that you are going to receive a
fixed sum of US dollars at some designated point in the future. In the meantime
you are going to receive interest, called a coupon, at a variable rate that
depends on how the price of the bond fluctuates during the intervening years
until redemption. Given the outlook for inflation, interest rates, the US economy
and the US dollar, US bonds must rank among the least attractive investments
on earth. Buyers or holders of US bonds at this point are making a number of
erroneous and dangerous assumptions - including that interest rates and inflation
will remain within reasonable bounds and that the US dollar will retain a reasonably
high percentage of its value during the life of the bond. As we know the Fed
has lowered short-term rates as an emergency measure, and immediately the crisis
ends - and even if it doesn't, it will raise them again. The official inflation
statistics are highly misleading - real world inflation is much higher than
government figures and is increasing rapidly. The outlook for the US dollar
remains dire. Thus the downside risk for bonds is very considerable, and it
is likely to be made a lot worse by the fact that investors are going to start
demanding much higher returns for the growing risks involved in being a lender.
We will now look at the charts for Treasury Bonds and Treasury Bills, starting
with the 1-year chart for the 30-year T Bond. At first glance things look fairly
rosy on all the charts presented here. On the 1-year chart for the 30-year
T Bond we can see that it remains in an uptrend that has been in force from
the low of last June. However, on closer inspection we can also see definite
signs of deterioration in the recent past. In the first place, a 5-wave sequence
has been completed since last June, which is normally followed, as a minimum,
by a 3-wave reaction that breaks the price well below the main uptrend channel.
Another important point to observe is that each successive up wave has become
steeper with the last one, wave 5, ending with a throwover breakout Island
Top, signaling exhaustion of the uptrend. In addition to marking the end of
the 5th wave of the series, this Island Top is also thought to mark the end
of the uptrend in force from last June, for the reasons just given above. Still
another point to observe is the fact that the wave 5 advance did not succeed
in taking prices comfortably clear of the wave 3 peak, and the support in the
vicinity of that peak is already being severely tested and looks set to fail
shortly. The now large gap between the 50 and 200-day moving averages is another
factor suggesting that the time is at hand for a change of trend. It doesn't
take a great effort of imagination for holders of T Bonds here to join the
dots and come to a conclusion about what to do them, especially given the current
comparatively good prices on offer, which are not expected to last much longer.
On the long-term chart for the 30-year T Bond it is interesting to observe
that it is still close to its all time highs - all the more reason to get rid
of it given the dire outlook. Although close to its highs, we can see that
it has, in fact, been weakening for a long time, with a bearish Rising Wedge
gradually giving way to a rectangular trading range in recent years, following
a breach of the important uptrend line. With prices up at the top of the trading
range it is clearly a good place to offload them. Looking at this chart it
is hard to envisage the severe bear market that surely lies ahead which will
trash the prices of all US Treasuries.

We will look now at the 10-year Treasury Note. As we will see there is not
a lot of difference between the charts for Bonds and the charts for Notes,
although Notes currently look stronger.

On the 1-year chart for the 10-year T Note the picture is much the same as
that for the 30-year T Bond, with both having completed a 5 wave sequence,
and an Island Reversal also appearing on the Note chart in January. The most
noticeable difference is the stronger 5th wave on the Note chart that took
it well clear of the 3rd wave peak and thus far it has not reacted back much
following this up wave, so that it is still way above its first support level,
unlike Bonds which did not clear the 3rd wave peak by much and are already
down on their 1st support level. So, Notes are stronger than Bonds at this
point, but that won't help them much as the Island Reversal on both charts
signals that they will both go down in unison.

The long-term 10-year T Note chart does not go back as far as the long-term
Bond chart above. On this chart we can see how the large bullish Falling Wedge
between 2003 and mid-2007 predicated a new uptrend, and we have seen a strong
uptrend develop as "funk money" has fled to the Treasury market as a perceived
safe haven. However, the steep uptrend is now believed to have run its course,
with the Island Top in the middle of the important resistance level towards
the 2003 high, that can just be made out on this chart, looking like the uptrend's
last gasp. The overbought status at that point is made clear by the MACD indicator
at the bottom of the chart. Even though it looks on this chart as if we could
see a little more upside short-term, or the development of a high trading range
before it goes lower, it looks set to react soon on this 1-year chart, without
any further significant progress.

If your objective is capital appreciation or simply to obtain a reasonable
return on capital employed it is very hard to make a case for owning US Treasuries
- on the contrary there is a compelling case for avoiding them or getting rid
of them. Fundamentally the outlook is dire - the US economy is weakening at
an alarming rate - the country is technically bankrupt and running such massive
deficits that it makes bankruptcy in the normal sense of the word look tame.
Short-term interest rates are being held at an artificially low level by the
Fed and that must end, meanwhile long-term rates are rising sharply. Inflation
in the US is high and rising, and it is grossly understated by official statistics.
The dollar continues to be debased at a breathtaking pace and renewed severe
decline appears to be inevitable, despite the enthusiastic efforts of other
countries and trading blocs to emulate the US by debasing their own currencies.
Technically, as we have seen, the recent strong uptrend in Treasuries appears
to have run its course and the prospect is for a retreat that could easily
accelerate into a savage and severe bear market. Given the unprecedented dangers
to the world financial system at this time, US Treasuries could easily end
up priced at a mere fraction of their current values.
Could this analysis be confounded by Treasuries breaking above the strong
resistance at their 2003 highs and accelerating into an even steeper parabolic
spike? - of course it could - anything is possible in markets. However, such
a development looks highly unlikely at this point, and traders taking positions
in anticipation of the Treasury uptrend breaking down can guard against an
upside breakout and spike by the simple expedient of placing stops above the
2003 highs.
There is an article doing the rounds that makes the argument that with the
election season powering up in the US, the elites will order the press to support
the dollar at every turn and "gin up" the economy, and also surmises that the
G7 ministers have decided that competitive devaluation against the dollar is
getting them nowhere, and they will therefore turn on gold instead, this being
the underlying reason for the IMF announcing that it will sell some of its
gold reserves. This combined with a drop in demand for gold from China and
India will conspire to ensure a seasonal drop in the gold price from now on
until August, it also presupposes. In addition it claims that the Saudi's will
likely help out their old friend George by dropping the oil price over the
Summer ahead of the election. This article makes a lot of assumptions, not
the least of which is that the elites maintain complete control over the economy,
major financial institutions, the press and even the mindset of international
investors, when the events of the past 6 months have clearly demonstrated that
they have lost control. The elites have, with their market deregulation and
financial engineering, bred an enormous Godzilla like monster which, having
eaten its fill, has bust out of it pen and is on the rampage, and it is actually
rather amusing to watch its former masters running after it in a futile effort
to regain control, whilst at the same time trying to fool the world at large
that they still have any semblance of control. The article also overlooks the
fact that the same Plutocratic elites control both the Democratic and Republican
parties - the election is nothing but a pantomime performed to maintain the
illusion of democracy for the masses - every single second you spend watching
electioneering in the US is a second of your life wasted. It is of course flattering
to gold that the G7 ministers should think that depressing its price is an
alternative to the path of competitive devaluation against the dollar, the
only trouble is that the notion is absurd - a rising gold price may bear witness
to the incompetence of their policies, but since when was incompetence in high
places an insuperable problem. So what if the gold price rises?
Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind. While Treasuries have undeniably
made impressive gains over the past 8 months, anyone continuing to hold them
forthwith given the now appalling and worsening fundamental outlook and the
recent technical deterioration must be classed as a fool. The only exception
being those elements on Wall St and elsewhere who are intentionally misallocating
the resources of others into Treasuries for abstruse reasons.
|