|
Welcome to the weekly report. The turmoil in credit markets continues and
attention moves to CDS, the Federal Reserve gets worried about its credibility
and the US markets get a boost 15 minutes from the end of Fridays close. We
finish with a quick recap of some stocks we looked at last
week and look around to see if anything else catches our eye.
Firstly an update to the continuing and widening collapse of the Municipal
Bond prices as the failures in the auction rate bond (ARB) markets grow. Last
week I mentioned 3 market makers who had stopped supporting ARB with their
own capital to support prices. That list has grown, in addition to Citi, Goldman
Sachs and Lehman Bros you can now add UBS, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch.
Without wanting to labour the point that's 6 of the biggest Investment Brokers
/ Banks that are effectively saying either the Muni bond market is toxic or
they do not have the capital to support the Muni market. I firmly believe it
is the latter.
I want to show you one chart that supports my assertion. It's from the Fed:

Colin Twiggs of Incredible Charts produced the chart, which saved me having
to do it. You have seen this chart in my previously written articles. Clearly
the situation has deteriorated at a rapid pace and is much more serious than
the credit scare last August. US banks have no reserves; they are for all intents
and purposes, broke. In fact they are beyond broke and as I suggested last
year banks
are now sub-prime. 150% of the reserves at depository institutions are
borrowed. That can only mean one thing, the banks have "lost" 1.5 times their
original non borrowed reserves. Not only have they lost what they had, they
went on and lost half as much again. If you or I did that, we would be bankrupted
and probably arrested for attempting to defraud the lender.
Notice the amount of total reserves (yellow line) is roughly equal and appears
cyclical to the Federal Reserve TAF lending programme. The Fed is no longer
the "lender of last resort" it has become the de-facto Bank of the USA.
I am amazed that so little attention has been paid to this state of affairs.
The Northern Rock debacle, one overstretched bank in the UK, has had all the
headlines, yet with the WHOLE banking industry in the US insolvent you hardly
see it mentioned.
Now, I am not going to give you advice on what to do about your cash on deposit
and I don't want you to think I am being overly bearish but??.I have called
this whole fiat credit collapse correctly from the beginning. No, I don't want
a pat on the back. I just want to read the next line carefully.
If I had money in a US bank today, I would be worried. So worried I would
withdraw the cash before new regulations are passed restricting account activity.
I know it sounds alarmist but then the first warnings always do.
This week saw talk of problems becoming apparent in the Credit Default Swap
markets, a leveraged, counterparty insurance and re-insurance scheme designed
to protect a buyer of debt against a default event using a third party who
sells the protection.
For some of us, this is old news and signs of trouble have been around for
sometime. Spreads on corporate debt have widened significantly of late. The
Markit iTraxx Europe Index (yes Europe, you didn't think it was just the USA
having problems did you?) composed of the prices of CDS for 125 investment
graded companies saw spreads widen to 135 basis points, up from 91bp just 2
weeks ago. The higher the spread, the more perceived risk is seen in the markets.
Get this, investors in this market are getting compensated for possible default
rates up to 5.5 times higher than the highest recorded levels in the past 50
years.
Maybe I'm wrong to point out rising risk, maybe it's just over reaction and
the spreads will fall back. Then again it is the market telling you about risk,
not me.
The Federal Reserve seems to have a problem. It is becoming clear that even
members of the committee are worried about the direction of Fed policy. The
concern seems to be rooted in very economic soul of the committee members.
Those that believe interest rates should go no lower or, indeed rise, are becoming
more vocal. The latest to speak out was Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher.
Although he has attracted a reputation for speaking "off message" thanks to
the 8th innings remarks about interest rate rises, he has since then been a
very clear and concise speaker. After voting against the latest cut in FFR
(9-1) he has been explaining why he is worried.
Mr Fisher is no career economist, he is not from the Bernanke school. It may
well explain why he feels strongly about the current situation. From the Dallas
Morning News here is a quick run through his roots:
"Even more intriguing than Mr. Fisher's lonely vote at the Fed is the path
this globe-trotter, self-made man and failed politician took to get there.
After his birth in Los Angeles to a father who had emigrated from Australia
and a Norwegian mother who grew up in South Africa, Mr. Fisher moved with his
parents to Mexico City, where he grew up speaking Spanish at school and playing
on a youth baseball team coached by Norman Borlaug, the future Nobel Peace
Prize winner.
Soon afterward, the family fell on hard times and moved back to the U.S.,
to Miami. Mr. Fisher, then about 11, remembers going with his mother to a pawn
shop there, where she sold her engagement ring for cash to buy clothes for
her children.
In another shift in fate, the boy won a scholarship to a private military
academy.
Years later, after studying at England's Oxford University and collecting
a degree from Harvard, as well as a Stanford University MBA, he would become
a wealthy fund manager - moving between the financial world and government
service in a career distinguished by intellectual curiosity and an independent
streak."
I fully suspect Mr Fisher does not rely on computer models of the economy
to get his "feel" for how things are going, unlike the Fed committee chairman.
This guy has been there and done it, successfully too, unlike Greenspan.
Mr Fisher understands poverty, he lived it. He knows the effects it has and
the struggles it causes. He is genuinely afraid of price inflation devaluing
the money in peoples' pockets. Another snippet from the Dallas Morning News
tells us all we need to know about Mr Fisher:
"There's a photo of Mr. Fisher with current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, and
a portrait of former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, one of Mr. Fisher's heroes."
Mr Fisher understands a simple rule, if you lower interest rates you ignite
$ devaluation. Do this during a period of commodity bullishness and the basics
become more expensive. It also raises what the Fed calls inflation expectations.
Simply put that means if people perceive that prices are going to rise, they
demand more money for their labour. True monetary inflation then follows. (NB,
this is mainstream thinking, not mine - I see a different outcome.)
I suspect what is really worrying Mr Fisher is that despite repeated large
cuts in the FFR, real interest rates for consumers, especially those hurting
right now, have not fallen. Indeed the rates at Freddie and Fannie, for instance,
have been rising of late. Why administer a medicine that has no effect on the
illness?
His latest remarks in a speech at Fort Worth seem to be alluding to such:
'We're trying to bridge the gap, between what most people believe will be
two quarters of 'anemia' in the economy, and prevent that turning into a recession,
but not at the same time 'stir those dreadful embers of inflation.'
He went on to mention that the fallout from the credit markets cannot happen
without some pain and that pain cannot be removed by the Federal Reserve.
With Bernanke talking of a "consensus committee" my bet is that although only
Fisher voted against a cut at the last meeting, many of the committee share
his reservations on current Fed policy. As the last Fed minutes pointed out:
"When prospects for growth had improved, a reversal of a portion of the recent
(rate)-easing actions, possibly even a rapid reversal, might be appropriate,"
That should be taken as a warning by anyone intending to borrow at current
low rates. You do not want to be on the wrong side of a 1% rise in FFR.
A funny thing happened on the way to the market close on Friday. The markets
took off with about 40 minutes of the session left, tagging on around 250 points.

The reason touted around appears to be this announcement:
"US BONDS/INSURANCE: CNBC is cited saying a bailout at bond insurer AMBAC
may be reported Mon. or Tues; this news is aiding stocks."
I saw this happen, I was trading at the time and had closed out a long (I
don't hold Index trades over weekends). The sell side of the Dow futures went
away on holiday, resulting in trades on the buy side leap-frogging higher.
A shame I didn't hang on a little longer but that's trading. It looks to me
as though the market believes, or wants to believe the bail-out is good news.
I have a couple of worries on that score.
Firstly, since when are bail-outs "good" news?
Secondly, another announcement on Friday hasn't been picked up on and it's
much more important:
To read the rest of the Weekly Report with updates on last weeks watchlist,
click here.
|