|
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
21st February 2008.
Over the past few weeks we've devoted a fair amount of commentary space to
the fact that gold stocks, as a group, have performed poorly relative to gold
bullion over virtually all timeframes up to about 2 years. Additionally, we've
noted that as a result of this underperformance the average gold stock recently
became as cheap, relative to gold bullion, as it was at the May-2005 bottom,
and that last week the GDX/gold ratio dropped back to its August-2007 low (which
was, in turn, its lowest level since the second quarter of 2005).
Another way to view the situation is to compare the price of gold with the
average valuation being assigned by the market to the in-ground resources of
junior gold mining companies. This exercise has been done by Canaccord and
it shows that since 11th October last year the rise in the gold price from
$750 to $900 was accompanied by a 30% DECLINE in the average market value of
the junior mining sector's in-ground gold resources. From a valuation perspective
this would only make sense if the average in-ground gold resource had been
dramatically over-valued to begin with or if the rise in gold's nominal price
had been associated with a decline in gold's real price (gold's price relative
to other investments and tangibles). Neither of these is true, so should we
conclude that the gold sector's performance simply doesn't make sense?
Well, that depends on what is meant by "sense". It wouldn't make sense if
the stock market were a machine that assigned prices based on an accurate measurement
of value, but the stock market is not now and has never been such a machine.
In fact, when it comes to value the stock market is totally clueless. Some
analysts talk about the market as if it were an all-seeing, all-knowing oracle,
but if that were true then dramatic price adjustments would never occur. That
such price adjustments occur quite often reflects the reality that the stock
market is, in effect, a manic-depressive mob that spends most of its time being
either too optimistic or too pessimistic.
The stock market's habit of shifting from one valuation extreme to another
creates excellent money-making opportunities, but you won't be able to take
advantage of these opportunities if you blindly assume that the market is right
or that past trends will continue. The market is like an emotional pendulum
-- the further it swings in one direction the closer it comes to swinging back
in the other direction.
Applying the pendulum analogy to the relationship between gold stocks and
gold bullion, the best time to be intermediate-term BEARISH on gold stocks
relative to gold bullion is following a lengthy period during which the stocks
have been STRONG relative to the bullion and the emotional pendulum has reached
an optimistic extreme (extreme optimism about the prospects of gold stocks),
as was the case at the end of 2003 and during the first half of 2006. By the
same token, the right time to be intermediate-term BULLISH on gold stocks relative
to gold bullion is when the pendulum has reached the opposite extreme (extreme
pessimism about the prospects of gold stocks) in response to a lengthy period
of UNDER-PERFORMANCE by the stocks, as was the case in 2000-2001 and May-2005,
and as is, perhaps, the case today. The point, in a nutshell, is that the best
time to buy gold stocks is after they have been beaten down to the point where
they are very low relative to gold and the majority has become convinced that
the metal is the better investment.
In general terms, one of the main reasons why most people aren't able to outperform
the market is that they get sucked into the market's current emotional state.
They become increasingly pessimistic when they should be getting increasingly
optimistic and become increasingly optimistic when they should be getting increasingly
pessimistic. Along similar lines, the time when it will be particularly appropriate
to question the common knowledge and to scrutinise the horizon for signs of
a trend change will be after the emotional pendulum has traveled in one direction
over an extended period.
Getting back to the gold stocks versus gold bullion issue, sometimes a dramatic
sell-off leading to extreme relative under-valuation will be enough, in itself,
to bring about a trend change. This was the case in April-May of 2005 when
gold stocks plunged relative to the gold price at the tail-end of an 18-month
consolidation. At other times there will be a specific catalyst that, when
coupled with under-valuation, will bring about a trend change. This was the
case in November of 2000 when extreme under-valuation combined with a major
trend reversal in the US yield-spread laid the foundation for a large rally
in the gold sector.
The current situation is similar to the final quarter of 2000 in that most
gold stocks have become very under-valued relative to gold bullion and, as
discussed in the latest Weekly Update, there is a potential catalyst for change
in the form of a major upward trend reversal in the US yield-spread. The start
of a large rally in gold stocks relative to gold bullion could still be a few
months away, but the support structure for such a rally is in place. Therefore,
investors should be getting increasingly OPTIMISTIC about the prospects for
the gold sector.
|