|
This week, as the financial sector began to give way under the unbearable
weight of bad mortgage debt, the Federal Reserve stepped in to save the day.
At least that's what it says in the script.
In a surprise move, the Federal Reserve announced its intention to swap $200
billion of treasury debt for $200 billion of potentially worthless mortgage-backed
securities. The Fed may have been partially spurred to take the step as a result
of the rapid collapse of Carlyle Capital Corp. a publicly traded private equity
firm that is a subsidiary of the Carlyle Group. The Dutch firm could not meet
margin calls on its depreciating collateral of AAA-rated mortgaged-backed securities
guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On Friday, the Fed then took the
unusual step of providing emergency "non-recourse" funding to Bear Stearns,
collateralized by that firm's similarly worthless mortgage debt. Apparently
the Fed now stands willing to assume any mortgage-related risk that no other
private entity would touch.
That the Fed would take such extreme measures, which would have been considered
unthinkable even a few months ago, followed a few notable media events that
may have affected their thinking. On Monday, Wall Street was rocked by an article
in Barron's that suggested that government sponsored lenders Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac lacked sufficient capital to cover the likely losses on the $5
trillion in mortgages they insure (a position that I have taken for years)
and raised the possibility of either bankruptcy or a government bailout. On
CNBC the next day, Paul McCulley, the managing director at Pimco, the world's
largest bond fund, publicly called for the Fed to use it balance sheet and
its printing press to buy mortgages.
According to the Fed, its new plan does not amount to buying mortgages but
simply accepting them as collateral for 28-day loans. However, will the Fed
really return these ticking time bombs to their true owners in 28 days, inciting
the very collapse its actions were originally designed to postpone? Why does
the Fed believe that the mortgages will be marketable next month; or the month
after that? Nor can we believe that such "loans" will be restricted to only
$200 billion. Bear Stearns and Carlyle are certainly not alone in massive exposure
to bad debt. Given the unprecedented leverage that many of the biggest financial
firms used to play in this market, there will be many more failures to come.
Does the Fed stand ready to bail out all comers? Based on this course of action,
the Fed, or more precisely American citizens, will end up with trillions, not
billions, of such securities on its books.
The problem with these mortgages (other than the borrowers lacking any means
or desire to repay them) is that the underlying collateral is worth a fraction
of the face amount. With recent foreclosure recovery rates amounting to less
than 50 cents on the dollar, it is no wonder that no one wants them. The real
estate bubble allowed borrowers to leverage themselves to the hilt using inflated
home values as collateral. However, now that the bubble has burst, mortgage
balances far exceed current property values. It is a trillion dollar time bomb
that no one can possibly defuse.
Paper dollars are technically Federal Reserve Notes, which means they are
liabilities of the Fed. When it puts newly minted notes into circulation it
does so by buying assets, usually U.S. treasuries, which it then holds on its
balance sheet to offset that liability. By swapping treasuries for mortgages,
the Fed effectively alters the compilation of its balance sheet and the backing
of its notes.
However, backing paper money with mortgages is nothing new. The French tried
it in the late 18th Century, and it lead to hyperinflation. Assignats, which
were first issued in 1790 to help finance the French revolution, were backed
by mortgages on confiscated church properties. Although the stolen underlying
collateral did have some value, the revolutionaries saw no reason to limit
how many Assignats were printed, which resulted in massive depreciation. Within
three years, price controls were introduced and failure to accept Assignats,
initially an offence subject to six years in prison, was made a capital crime.
By 1799 the currency was completely worthless.
If even the threat of death could not prop up the Assignat, does anyone believe
that the currency could have been saved if Robespierre had forcefully mouthed
a "strong Assignat policy" as President Bush is now doing with the dollar?
Rather than repeating the mistakes of history we should learn from them. Our
own failed experiment with the Continental currency as well as the Great Depression
should prove conclusively that it is Austrian, and not French, economics we
should be following.
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read
my new book "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and
preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best way
to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|
Peter Schiff C.E.O. and Chief Global
Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
Mr.
Schiff is one of the few non-biased investment advisors (not committed solely
to the short side of the market) to have correctly called the current bear
market before it began and to have positioned his clients accordingly. As a
result of his accurate forecasts on the U.S. stock market, commodities, gold
and the dollar, he is becoming increasingly more renowned. He has been quoted
in many of the nations leading newspapers, including The Wall Street Journal,
Barron's, Investor's Business Daily, The Financial Times, The New York Times,
The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Dallas
Morning News, The Miami Herald, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
The Arizona Republic, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Christian Science
Monitor, and has appeared on CNBC, CNNfn., and Bloomberg. In addition,
his views are frequently quoted locally in the Orange County Register.
Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant
with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and
accounting from U.C. Berkley in 1987. A financial professional for seventeen
years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since
January 2000. An expert on money, economic theory, and international investing,
he is a highly recommended broker by many of the nation's financial newsletters
and advisory services.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Euro Pacific
Capital, Inc.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|