|
Financial distress continued through the weekend, which inspired policymakers
to heroic, but nevertheless orthodox remedies. The notion that some philosopher-king
and his committee can prevent or defer the severe credit contraction that follows
every great financial mania has been around for centuries. When the Bank of
England was formed in 1694, the original promoters claimed that it would "infallibly" lower
interest rates and all would be well. But great booms and busts continued to
happen, with usually a couple of outstanding asset inflations brewing up each
century.
The latest is now sinking to new depths and the implications are profound.
At the peak of any boom, participants all assume that endless amounts of leverage
can be employed with little concern for risk. Then, when the play becomes exhausted
the most aggressive positions get wiped out, and the liquidation of unsupportable
positions can go on for a few years.
This time around, what will be soon seen as a school of radical economics
became convinced that arbitrary manipulations of interest rates and currencies
would keep even the most outrageous abuse of credit going forever, or at least
as far as the foreseeable future extends.
That has been standard and continuous practice at the Fed over a number of
generations of interventionist economists. Then, over the past 25 years legions
of financial adventures created enormous amounts of artificial securities,
artificially priced and backed by artificial credit ratings.
Anyone who had spent any time watching the old and notorious Vancouver Stock
Exchange would know that the public will believe the most preposterous story – so
long as the price is going up. Then with the inevitable plunge belief disappears
in an instant, leaving chagrin and dismay.
The key to the reversal is the decline in price, which places decision-making
powers in the hands of margin clerks, whose job description is to get the accounts
in line. It seems that the job description of ambitious central bankers has
been to get the accounts out of line. In so many words, the putative elimination
of risk by central planners created the riskiest credit structure in history.
Also, because politics will soon rear its ugly head it is worth emphasizing
that interventionist economists have been employed by all political parties
from the left to the not-so-left, all governments, all trade unions, and all
big corporations as well as financial institutions and investment dealers.
Markets have been distorted to an unprecedented degree.
Our research indicated that the change in the credit markets towards adversity
would likely be accomplished by June, last year. In July the reversal was sufficient
to conclude that "The biggest train wreck in the history of credit had begun." Although
severe lately, it is not over.
Showing how quickly conditions are changing, The Wall Street Journal headlined
in Friday morning's edition "Some Traders Take Bullish Tack in Bear Stearns".
Another weekend comment was from a professor at The London School of Economics,
and was on the nature of the Fed's bailout plan: "Throwing out four decades
of monetary history". This meant that the Fed was taking on riskier
securities that he described as "Socialism for the rich, which is both
inefficient and objectionable."
Once again, the baton of monetary power has been forcefully transferred, from
central bankers to margin clerks, and in due course the LSE professor will
discover that post-bubble contractions are very democratic.
So long as credit was expanding, market participants and central bankers could
earnestly believe in any number of preposterous stories.
Credit is in a vicious contraction and so is the biggest secular belief system
in history.

|