While there is no question stocks are trying to form what market technicians
call a double bottom, not much has really changed in recent weeks in terms
of market leadership. It is helpful to take a step back and see what is actually
happening from both a technical and fundamental perspective when times are
uncertain and people are continually asking, "Has the market found a bottom?"
Technically Not Much Has Changed - Stocks Remain in a Primary Downtrend
The press is full of stories of how the financial stocks may have found a
bottom, which in turn may mean the general stock market has also bottomed.
It is also easy to find stories calling for an end to the bull market in commodities.
When you clear away all the noise, investing is about owning things that are
in long-term uptrends and avoiding or underweighting things which are in long-term
downtrends. You do not need to be a Certified Market Technician to see that
financial stocks remain firmly in a downtrend (see chart below).
Graph 1: U.S. Financial Stocks - Little Evidence of a Bottom

Similarly, the recent pullback in commodities has done nothing yet to even
remotely place the current primary uptrend in jeopardy. The fundamentals in
many commodity markets remain favorable from a long-term perspective. It is
prudent to acknowledge economic weakness could cause sharp corrections in some
commodities. As of Tuesday's close, nothing is sounding alarms in the chart
below, which shows a diversified basket of crude oil, heating oil, corn, wheat,
gold, and aluminum.
Graph 2: Physical Commodities - Little Evidence of a Top

Fundamentals: Are Stocks Cheap and Are The Worst of the Write-Offs Behind
Us?
From yesterday's Wall Street Journal (3/25/08):
"The stock market's comeback lately erodes the argument that equities
are cheap. As of Monday's close, the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index
was priced at about 16 times the past four quarters' earnings, nearly matching
the market's long-term price-to-earnings ratio. The S&P looks better
relative to expected earnings for 2008, with a forward price-to-earnings
ratio of about 14, below the long-term average. The trouble is that forward
earnings are based on optimistic assumptions about earnings growth. They
presume earnings will grow 17% in 2008, more than reversing a 6% 2007 decline
and more than doubling their average growth since 1989 -- despite the fact
that analysts agree earnings are likely shrinking in the first quarter.
If earnings merely return their average growth rate of 8% -- unlikely,
if the economy really is in recession -- the forward P/E rises to 15. If
earnings fall 17.5% -- as they have, on average, during the past three
years that included recessions, according to S&P data -- then the forward
P/E ratio rises to 20, undermining the idea that stocks are cheap. Some
market bulls suggest the recent rallies in financials and other interest-rate-sensitive
sectors are a sign the market has begun to act as it typically does at
the start of new economic cycles. But maybe these "early cycle" bulls are
getting ahead of themselves. The market doesn't even seem to have priced
in much of an earnings slowdown yet."
From Tuesday's Bloomberg Reports (3/25/08):
"March 25 (Bloomberg) -- Wall Street banks, brokerages and hedge funds
may report $460 billion in credit losses from the collapse of the subprime
mortgage market, or almost four times the amount already disclosed, according
to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Profits will continue to wane, other analysts
said."
Current Trends Remain Unfavorable for Global Stocks
The table below focuses on what is happening now from a technical perspective,
which is better than reading a thousand forecasts or predictions of where the
markets may be headed.
Table 1: Long-Term Trends

From S&P:
"New York, March 25, 2008 - Record Declines in Home Prices Continued
in 2008 According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices - Data
through January 2008, released today by Standard & Poor's for its S&P/Case-Shiller1
Home Price Indices, the leading measure of U.S. home prices, show declines
in the prices of existing single family homes across the United States
continued into the new year, with 16 of the 20 reporting MSAs posting record
low annual declines, of which 10 are in double-digits."
When the Fundamentals and Technicals Align
The best time to invest is when you have both positive fundamentals and positive
market action (or technicals/charts). It is very difficult to say the charts
look good (yet), and nearly impossible to say the fundamentals look good.
The Positives - Keeping an Open Mind
- Market is trying to form a double bottom
- Sentiment is in bottoming territory
- The FED is pulling out all the stops to put a floor under asset markets
- It is good to buy when there is blood in the streets
- The market climbs a wall of worry
What do you do?
You remain skeptical, but open minded, about bullish outcomes for stocks.
If this double bottom is indeed "the bottom", then the charts will reflect
that in due time. There is not enough evidence in either the fundamentals or
the technicals to put significant amounts of capital at risk in stocks. Nor
is there enough technical evidence (as long as the January market lows hold)
to blindly pitch your tent in the bearish camp for stocks. However, there is
enough evidence to have picked out a place to possibly pitch your tent in the
bearish camp. If the January S&P 500 lows are taken out, it would add to
the weight of the unfavorable evidence.
If we stay focused on what is happening now while respecting there are numerous
paths for the Fed and markets to take from here, we'll be fine. There remains
a significant amount of what I call "press conference risk" where one press
release from the Fed or announcement from the financial or housing sector can
change the market's dynamics on a dime.