|
The sudden about-face last night to become bullish on gold and silver stocks
again requires some explanation. We have been aware for some considerable time
that Precious Metals stocks have been woefully underperforming gold and silver,
a point made clear by Mr Bob Moriarty of www.321gold.com in
his recent article Buy
with both hands, but were not minded to go long because our research indicated
that another heavy decline in gold and silver was imminent, which is what we
have just seen. Gold dropped by a hefty $33 yesterday, vindicating our near-term
bearish stance, but what was remarkable was that while Precious Metals stocks
dropped substantially, the drop was nowhere near commensurate with the size
of the drop in gold. Regardless of the extent to which this can be attributed
to the strong rise in the broad market, it was a bullish sign. It implies two
things - one is that even if gold does fall to our original immediate downside
target at or below $850, stocks are unlikely to fall much further, the other
is that the moment gold and silver turn up stocks are likely to rebound sharply.
This was the reason we ditched our speculative Puts yesterday in the last hour
of trading for a profit.

On the 1-year chart for the HUI index which was posted on the site last night
as a preliminary to this full article we can see 3 compelling reasons suggesting
that stocks have hit bottom and are now a strong buy here. One is that they
yesterday refused to break below their low of the 1st quarter, a strongly bullish
sign. Another is that they have dropped back to the lower support line of the
uptrend channel shown. Still another is that the index is now not far above
a rising 200-day moving average, a classic buy spot, with a support zone not
far beneath. Finally the index is now deeply oversold, as shown by the MACD
indicator at the bottom of the chart. Now, you may ask, weren't we talking
about a bearish convergence of the uptrend channel on this chart a few days
back? That's true, we were, and the channel lines do converge when the point
of origin of the lower channel line is taken to start from the August low,
and when log scaling is used, but when the point of origin is taken from the
December low, which is legitimate as it is outside of the earlier trading range,
and arithmetic scaling is used, the bearish convergence of the channel lines
is eliminated. Is this a fudge? - we would rather call it an adjustment - a
necessary one as the other factors we have just listed are indicating that
we are very probably at a bottom.
More follows for subscribers...
|
Clive Maund,
CliveMaund.com
The above represents the opinion and analysis of Mr. Maund,
based on data available to him, at the time of writing. Mr. Maunds opinions
are his own, and are not a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell securities.
No responsibility can be accepted for losses that may result as a consequence
of trading on the basis of this analysis.
Mr. Maund is an independent analyst who receives no compensation
of any kind from any groups, individuals or corporations mentioned in his reports.
As trading and investing in any financial markets may involve serious risk
of loss, Mr. Maund recommends that you consult with a qualified investment
advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction
and do your own due diligence and research when making any kind of a transaction
with financial ramifications.
Copyright © 2004-2008 CliveMaund.com
All Rights Reserved.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|