|
Those blindsided by the recent financial meltdown are now loudly blaming the
free market for its failure to police its own excesses, and are calling for
greater regulation to prevent future disasters. But for those who clearly observed
the problems developing (in high definition slow motion) the blame can be directed
squarely at the policies of the Greenspan/Bernanke Federal Reserve. As has
been the case countless times in history, the free market will now pay the
price for government incompetence.
In Senate hearings this week, all parties involved completely ignored the
Fed's own culpability in igniting the speculative fever. It's as if a senior
prom had turned into a wild bacchanalia, and angry parents now question why
the chaperones failed to notice the disrobing or why the DJ played provocative
music, all the while ignoring the bearded gentleman pouring grain alcohol into
the punch bowl.
A perfect illustration of the Fed's failure to take responsibility can be
found in Bernanke's explanations regarding inflation, which he solely attributes
to the effects of the rapid increase in global commodity prices. He failed
to mention that commodity prices are rising as a direct consequence of his
monetary policy, which is debasing not just the U.S. dollar, but currencies
around the world. Rather than accepting the blame for creating inflation, Bernanke
is shifting the blame to the free market. The Senators are happy to let him
get away with it as it provides more evidence to support the "need " for more
government to save the economy from the disastrous effects of unbridled capitalism.
When asked how we got into this mess, Bernanke replied that our problems resulted
from an excessive credit bubble characterized by aggressive leverage, reckless
lending, and extreme risk taking. Absent from his explanation was the Fed's
role in irresponsibly setting interest rates below market levels, which mispriced
risk, got the party started and kept it raging into the wee hours of the morning.
The expressed goal of the Fed for much of this decade was, and is, to encourage
and facilitate borrowing and lending.
During his testimony, Bernanke continued to claim that Bear Steams was not
bailed out as shareholders only received about $10 per share. Of course, $10
is better than zero, which is what they surely would have received if the Fed
hadn't thrown taxpayer money around. What about Bear's creditors though? Although
the collapse of Bear Stearns would have cost bond holders dearly, the bailout
essentially makes them whole. Here again, the Fed creates even greater moral
hazards by encouraging excessive risk taking. By bailing out lenders who extend
excessive credit, the Fed simply invites more of that behavior. The free market
must be allowed to properly price risk. Lenders need to know that when they
lend money, whether to highly leveraged investment banks and hedge funds, or
to over-stretched homebuyers or credit card users, they risk not getting paid
back. By interfering with this process the Fed simply guarantees more losses
and even bigger bailouts in the future.
Also, leveraged speculators need to know that it is not "heads they win, tails
the taxpayers lose". Wall Street executives amassed fortunes by making extremely
risky bets. Now that those bets have soured, why is it taxpayers that have
to swallow the losses? Wall Street billionaires earn their bucks on the backs
of the middle class, who made little on the way up, but foot the entire bill
on the way down.
While Bernanke talked about the underlying strength of our economy, he claimed
necessity in saving Bear Stearns from bankruptcy as it would have brought down
our entire financial system. How sound can our economy be if the failure of
one investment bank could topple it? Does this now mean that no more major
banks or brokerage firms will be allowed to fail? Since we routinely accused
Japan of practicing "crony capitalism" what do you suppose we should call our
version?
Not to be outdone in rewarding reckless behavior, earlier in the week Congress
passed $15 billion in tax breaks for homebuilders, who had made their fortunes
overbuilding during the bubble and unloading their shares to a gullible public.
By threatening to hold back on their political contributions, these same homebuilders
are awarded still more billions. The last ones we should be subsidizing are
homebuilders. After all, the last thing we need right now is more homes.
The legislation also contained a provision that offers generous tax credits
to individuals who buy homes out of foreclosure. While this is billed as a
benefit to homebuyers, it is just another hand out to lenders, as those qualifying
for the tax breaks will simply pay more at auctions as the tax breaks subsidize
higher bids. The real winners are the creditors who get more in foreclosure
than would have been the case had buyers not had their bids subsidized by the
government.
Of course, for all the talk about taxpayer bailouts, none of the senators
bothered to mention that, for the moment, no tax increases are actually on
the table. Instead, the bailouts are being financed by savers, pensioners,
wage earners, investors and the elderly on fixed incomes, who all suffer staggering
increases in their costs of living, as the Fed uses inflation to rob Main Street
to pay off Wall Street.
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read
my new book "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and
preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best way
to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|