Barron's at last weekend's issue has a cover article talking about commodity
bubble. Don't get too scared by it. First of all, a cover article like this
saying bubble usually means it is not a bubble yet, from contrarian perspective.
Secondly, price increase itself doesn't necessarily indicates the status of
a bubble, if the fundamental supports it, especially after a long period of
very depressing low prices. For example, NASDAQ had a good run of multiple
folds for 10 years after 1987 market crash, it was still much lower in 1997
than today's price even after the famous 2000 crash from the internet bubble.
Also during those 10 years, NASDAQ has gone through many sector rotations,
from computer hardware to software, from telecom to internet. At the end of
the day, for commodities, it is always the supply and demand driving the price
long term. The commitments of traders (COT) report is important for individual
commodities, but more from short term trading perspective due to the nature
of speculation, and I also agree some of them have too much hype in them and
due for correction, but from a few individual commodity COT reports to predict
that the whole commodity sector is in bubble stage, it is premature and has
little predictable power.
I think what has been happening in the commodity market since early in the
decade is a sector and product rotation among commodities themselves. I am
fully aware that it is always dangerous to say this time is different, but
we have not seen this type of commodity rotation for a while. But at the same
time, it is really not "this time is different", because this somewhat similar
rotation happened in 1970s too. In both periods, we see that oil, uranium and
energy are leading the charge, then the solid commodities (metals) and soft
ones (agricultural products) follow. When one or several of them get overbought,
overheated and take a rest with correction, a few others simply take over to
lead the charge, so on and so forth. Today when everyone is cheering about
wheat and soybeans finally correcting, does anyone notice that rice and corn
are actually at all time high?
This commodity boom is actually more dangerous than 1970s when people were
more focusing on energy and monetary function of precious metals. Wheat is
the common ingredient for almost all foods in the supermarket, rice is everything
for people living in Asia. There have been many indications that the agricultural
consumption continues to grow each year, and inventories remain at all time
low, production remain flat or declining, similar to oil, energy and metal
sectors, without even factoring in biofuel. There is shortfall in almost every
commodities, no matter solid or soft, black or white. With inventories low
and demand high for all agricultural products, with competing acreage among
them, the USDA's Prospective Plantings report becomes less meaningful than
before. Due to the price drop in soybeans and rise in corns, Farmers will probably
change their mind by the time of planting anyway.
When every essential element of our life is going up, such as food, there
is really not much anyone can do, including the governments trying to curb
inflation, since there is no cheaper substitution hanging around anymore. There
are already many reports indicating that about 30 countries in the world are
running short of food, more and more governments are blocking any export of
agricultural products to ensure their own people get feed first. This is contagious,
which will cause more governments to do so, making the food shortage a much
bigger problem to solve at the global basis. Same thing on inflation, thanks
to the much more global financial market than 1970s, inflation also becomes
much more contagious than before.
This commodity rotation will also make people holding any type of commodities
profitable, since commodities are taking their turns to go up. As far as people
don't chase the high flying ones, use minimum leverage, have patience to sit
and wait for the next turn on theirs, in a year or two or even shorter, their
time will come.