|
There has been a lot of talk in the news recently about the Federal Reserve
and the actions it has taken over the past few months. Many media pundits have
been bending over backwards to praise the Fed for supposedly restoring stability
to the market. This interpretation of the Fed's actions couldn't be further
from the truth.
The current market crisis began because of Federal Reserve monetary policy
during the early 2000s in which the Fed lowered the interest rate to a below-market
rate. The artificially low rates led to overinvestment in housing and other
malinvestments. When the first indications of market trouble began back in
August of 2007, instead of holding back and allowing bad decision-makers to
suffer the consequences of their actions, the Federal Reserve took aggressive,
inflationary action to ensure that large Wall Street firms would not lose money.
It began by lowering the discount rates, the rates of interest charged to banks
who borrow directly from the Fed, and lengthening the terms of such loans.
This eliminated much of the stigma from discount window borrowing and enabled
troubled banks to come to the Fed directly for funding, pay only a slightly
higher interest rate but also secure these loans for a period longer than just
overnight.
After the massive increase in discount window lending proved to be ineffective,
the Fed became more and more creative with its funding arrangements. It has
since created the Term Auction Facility (TAF), the Primary Dealer Credit Facility
(PDCF), and the Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF). The upshot of all
of these new programs is that through auctions of securities or through deposits
of collateral, the Fed is pushing hundreds of billions of dollars of funding
into the financial system in a misguided attempt to shore up the stability
of the system.
The PDCF in particular is a departure from the established pattern of Fed
intervention because it targets the primary dealers, the largest investment
banks who purchase government securities directly from the New York Fed. These
banks have never before been allowed to borrow from the Fed, but thanks to
the Fed Board of Governors, these investment banks can now receive loans from
the Fed in exchange for securities which will in all likelihood soon lose much
of their value.
The net effect of all this new funding has been to pump hundreds of billions
of dollars into the financial system and bail out banks whose poor decision
making should have caused them to go out of business. Instead of being forced
to learn their lesson, these poor-performing banks are being rewarded for their
financial mismanagement, and the ultimate cost of this bailout will fall on
the American taxpayers. Already this new money flowing into the system is spurring
talk of the next speculative bubble, possibly this time in commodities.
Worst of all, the Treasury Department has recently proposed that the Federal
Reserve, which was responsible for the housing bubble and subprime crisis in
the first place, be rewarded for all its intervention by being turned into
a super-regulator. The Treasury foresees the Fed as the guarantor of market
stability, with oversight over any financial institution that could pose a
threat to the financial system. Rewarding poor performing financial institutions
is bad enough, but rewarding the institution that enabled the current economic
crisis is unconscionable.
|