Technical Market Report

By: Mike Burk | Sat, Feb 21, 2004
Print Email

The good news is:
 • Next week has a mildly positive seasonal bias.
 • The number of new lows remains insignificant.

It is difficult to time a market that goes straight up and that is what we have seen for the past 11 months. During straight up markets, indicators that normally signal down periods only signal a slowing of the advance at best. As long as the number of new lows remains insignificant, it is unlikely there will be a serious decline in spite of what the other indicators are saying.

With a few exceptions including Retail, Energy (not energy services) and Forest products most sector and broad market indicators are heading downward. Last week I showed several charts of Summation indexes (SI) which are calculated by adding oscillator values to a running total. When the oscillator is above 0 the SI rises, when it is below 0 it falls. SI's can be calculated on advances and declines (AD), new highs and new lows (HL) and upside and downside volume (UD). The indexes can be calculated from broad market data as well as sectors. Direction, not level, of the Si's is most important. When direction of the SI's are in agreement, it is imprudent to bet against them.

Last week all of most of the summation indexes continued the downward move that began late the week before.

The chart below all shows the NASDAQ composite and three summation indexes and indexes calculated from total NASDAQ data.

The next chart shows the Russell 2000 along with indexes calculated from the component issues of the Russell 2000. New highs and new lows for the HL SI were calculated on a trailing 6 week basis rather than 52 weeks as reported by the exchanges.

Some analysts use an index of the Fidelity Select funds as a well managed market index. Volume data is not available for mutual funds, but SI's can be calculated from advances and declines and new highs and new lows. The chart below shows an average of the Fidelity select funds along with an AD SI and an HL SI. New highs and new lows for the HL SI were calculated on a trailing 6 week basis rather than 52 weeks as reported by the exchanges.

Not everything is negative. Forest products, shown in the chart below, appears strong.

Last week I showed performance tables of the week before and the week after options expiration in February. The Monday after options expiration in February has been one of the weakest of that 10 (trading) day period.

Next week includes the last 5 trading days of February. For the past 15 years there has been a slight upward bias during this period as you can see in the tables below. Typically seasonally strong periods favor small caps.

Last 5 days of February.
The number following the daily return represents the day of the week;
1 = Monday, 2 = Tuesday etc.

The number following the year represents its position in the presidential cycle.

Russell 2k Day5 Day4 Day3 Day2 Day1 Totals
1989-1 -0.88% 3 0.01% 4 -0.75% 5 -0.19% 1 0.39% 2 -1.41%
1990-2 0.48% 4 -0.74% 5 -0.19% 1 0.32% 2 0.56% 3 0.43%
1991-3 0.67% 5 0.65% 1 -0.83% 2 0.83% 3 0.99% 4 2.32%
1992-4 -0.72% 1 -0.63% 2 1.26% 3 0.39% 4 0.07% 5 0.37%
1993-1 -1.27% 1 -0.25% 2 0.95% 3 0.52% 4 0.75% 5 0.69%
1994-2 0.38% 2 -0.05% 3 -1.02% 4 0.30% 5 0.96% 1 0.57%
1995-3 0.03% 3 0.40% 4 0.20% 5 -0.63% 1 1.07% 2 1.07%
1996-4 0.19% 5 -0.14% 1 -0.14% 2 0.13% 3 -0.10% 4 -0.06%
1997-1 0.02% 1 0.09% 2 -0.80% 3 -0.74% 4 -0.30% 5 -1.73%
1998-2 0.51% 1 -0.44% 2 0.92% 3 0.67% 4 0.06% 5 1.72%
1999-3 1.41% 1 0.30% 2 -0.94% 3 -0.64% 4 -0.12% 5 0.01%
2000-4 1.66% 3 0.75% 4 0.49% 5 0.17% 1 3.59% 2 6.66%
2001-1 -1.29% 4 0.04% 5 2.27% 1 -1.96% 2 -0.91% 3 -1.85%
2002-2 1.45% 5 0.67% 1 0.66% 2 0.28% 3 -0.69% 4 2.37%
2003-3 -1.69% 1 0.83% 2 -0.89% 3 0.97% 4 -0.25% 5 -1.03%
Averages 0.06% 0.10% 0.08% 0.03% 0.40% 0.67%
Winners 67% 60% 47% 67% 60%  
 
S&P 500 Day5 Day4 Day3 Day2 Day1 Totals
1989-1 -1.71% 3 0.39% 4 -1.68% 5 0.24% 1 0.36% 2 -2.40%
1990-2 -0.60% 4 -0.48% 5 1.39% 1 0.48% 2 0.49% 3 1.29%
1991-3 0.19% 5 0.44% 1 -1.21% 2 1.36% 3 -0.18% 4 0.59%
1992-4 0.20% 1 -0.44% 2 1.19% 3 -0.36% 4 -0.28% 5 0.32%
1993-1 0.23% 1 -0.10% 2 1.40% 3 0.33% 4 0.24% 5 2.10%
1994-2 0.81% 2 -0.16% 3 -1.37% 4 0.39% 5 0.23% 1 -0.10%
1995-3 0.48% 3 0.38% 4 0.25% 5 -0.88% 1 0.74% 2 0.97%
1996-4 0.03% 5 -1.31% 1 -0.50% 2 -0.38% 3 -0.67% 4 -2.82%
1997-1 1.06% 1 0.22% 2 -0.79% 3 -1.32% 4 -0.53% 5 -1.36%
1998-2 0.38% 1 -0.73% 2 1.20% 3 0.55% 4 0.06% 5 1.46%
1999-3 2.66% 1 -0.08% 2 -1.40% 3 -0.67% 4 -0.54% 5 -0.02%
2000-4 0.63% 3 -0.53% 4 -1.48% 5 1.10% 1 1.36% 2 1.08%
2001-1 -0.20% 4 -0.56% 5 1.75% 1 -0.77% 2 -1.43% 3 -1.20%
2002-2 0.82% 5 1.80% 1 0.00% 2 0.05% 3 -0.28% 4 2.38%
2003-3 -1.84% 1 0.72% 2 -1.31% 3 1.18% 4 0.46% 5 -0.79%
Averages 0.21% -0.03% -0.17% 0.09% 0.00% 0.10%
Winners 73% 40% 40% 60% 53%  

There is no evidence that the recent soft patch has ended and the market is not oversold. So it is likely the recent weakness will last a few more days. Next week has a slightly positive seasonal bias and that should limit the decline.

I expect the major indices will be higher on Friday February 27 than they were on Friday February 20.


 

Author: Mike Burk

Mike Burk

Mike Burk independently publishes a weekly newsletter on the stock market from a technical perspective.

Charts and figures presented herein are believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to their accuracy. Recent (last 10-15 yrs.) data has been supplied by CSI (csidata.com), FastTrack (fasttrack.net), Quotes Plus (qp2.com) and the Wall Street Journal (wsj.com). Historical data is from Barron's and ISI price books. The views expressed are provided for information purposes only and should not be construed in any way as investment advice. Furthermore, the opinions expressed may change without notice.

Copyright © 2003-2016 Mike Burk

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright © Safehaven.com