On Morgan Stanley's Latest Quarterly Earnings - More Than Meets the Eye???
It has taken a while to get this out, but the core message hasn't changed...
1Q10 Results review
For 1Q10, MS reported significant increase in its net revenues to $9.1 billion from $6.3 billion in 4Q09 and $2.9 billion in 1Q09, primarily driven by trading and principal investments revenues which increased to $4.1 billion versus $1.3 billion and $205 million in 4Q09 and 1Q09, respectively. Trading and principal investment revenues in 1Q10 increased off improvement in debt-related credit spreads and better results in Fixed Income. Revenues from Investment banking and Asset management, distribution and admin fees increased 21.4% and 126.7% (y-on-y) to 1060 million and $1,963 million, respectively. However, both the categories reported a quarter-on-quarter decline in revenues of 36.6% and 0.6%, respectively. Commissions earned for the year increased 63.8% (y-o-y) and 1.1% (q-o-q) to $1.3 billion. Compensation expenses increased to $4.4 billion from $2.0 billion in1Q09 and $3.8 billion in 4Q09, while non-compensation expenses were up 38.4% (y-o-y) mainly off MSSB inclusion and higher business activity. Consequently, net income from continuing operations increased to $2.1 billion, which was further supported by a $382 million tax benefit associated with prior year's undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries.
All paying subscribers can download our analysis and view of MS's latest results
here: 
MS
1Q10 Review (351.75 kB 2010-05-24 09:43:31). Historical MS analysis and
valuations may downloaded as follows:
MS
4Q09 results (275.43 kB 2010-01-28 04:38:11)
MS
Simulated Government Stress Test (2.49 MB 2009-05-05 11:36:25)
MS
Stess Test Model Assumptions and Stress Test Valuation (339.99 kB 2009-04-22
07:55:17)
Those who don't subscribe should reference my warnings of the concentration and reliance on FICC revenues (foreign exchange, currencies, and fixed income trading). Morgan Stanley's exposure to this as well as what I have illustrated in full detail via the the Pan-European Sovereign Debt Crisis series, has increased materially. As excerpted from "The Next Step in the Bank Implosion Cycle???":
The amount of bubbliciousness, overvaluation and risk in the market is outrageous, particularly considering the fact that we haven't even come close to deflating the bubble from earlier this year and last year! Even more alarming is some of the largest banks in the world, and some of the most respected (and disrespected) banks are heavily leveraged into this trade one way or the other. The alleged swap hedges that these guys allegedly have will be put to the test, and put to the test relatively soon. As I have alleged in previous posts (As the markets climb on top of one big, incestuous pool of concentrated risk...), you cannot truly hedge multi-billion risks in a closed circle of only 4 counterparties, all of whom are in the same businesses taking the same risks.
So, How are Banks Entangled in the Mother of All Carry Trades?
Trading revenues for U.S Commercial banks have witnessed robust growth since 4Q08 on back of higher (although of late declining) bid-ask spreads and fewer write-downs on investment portfolios. According to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, commercial banks' reported trading revenues rose to a record $5.2 bn in 2Q09, which is extreme (to say the least) compared to $1.6 bn in 2Q08 and average of $802 mn in past 8 quarters.
High dependency on Forex and interest rate contracts
Continued growth in trading revenues on back of growth in overall derivative contracts, (especially for interest rate and foreign exchange contracts) has raised doubt on the sustainability of revenues over hear at the BoomBustBlog analyst lab. According to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, notional amount of derivatives contracts of U.S Commercial banks grew at a CAGR of 20.5% to $203 trillion by 2Q-09 from $87.9 trillion in 2004 with interest rate contracts and foreign exchange contracts comprising a substantial 84.5% and 7.5% of total notional value of derivatives, respectively. Interest rate contracts have grown at a CAGR of 20.1% to $171.9 trillion between 4Q-04 to 2Q-09 while Forex contracts have grown at a CAGR of 13.4% to $15.2 trillion between 4Q-04 to 2Q-09.
In terms of absolute dollar exposure, JP Morgan has the largest exposure towards
both Interest rate and Forex contracts with notional value of interest rate
contracts at $64.6 trillion and Forex contracts at $6.2 trillion exposing itself
to volatile changes in both interest rates and currency movements (non-subscribers
should reference An
Independent Look into JP Morgan, while subscribers should reference JPM
Report (Subscription-only) Final - Professional, and JPM
Forensic Report (Subscription-only) Final- Retail). However, Goldman Sachs
with interest rate contracts to total assets at 318.x and Forex contracts to
total assets at 11.2x has the largest relative exposure (see Goldman
Sachs Q2 2009 Pre-announcement opinion 2009-07-13 00:08:57 920.92 Kb, Goldman
Sachs Stress Test Professional 2009-04-20 10:06:45 4.04 Mb, Goldman
Sachs Stress Test Retail 2009-04-20 10:08:06 720.25 Kb,). As subscribers
can see from the afore-linked analysis, Goldman is trading at an extreme premium
from a risk adjusted book value perspective.
As a result of a surge in interest rate and Forex contracts, dependency on
revenues from these products has increased substantially and has in turn been
a source of considerable volatility to total revenues. As of 2Q-09 combined
trading revenues (cash and off balance sheet exposure) from Interest rate and
Forex for JP Morgan stood at $2.4 trillion, or 9.5% of the total revenues while
the same for GS and BAC (subscribers, see BAC
Swap exposure_011009 2009-10-15 01:02:21 279.76 Kb) stood at $(196) million
and $433 million, respectively. As can be seen, Goldman's trading teams are
not nearly as infallible as urban myth makes them out to be.
Although JP Morgan's exposure to interest rate contracts has declined to $64.5 trillion as of 2Q09 from $75.2 trillion as of 3Q07, trading revenues from Interest rate contracts (cash and off balance sheet position) have witnessed a significant volatility spike and have increased marginally to $1,512 in 2Q09 compared with $1,496 in 3Q07. Although JPM's Forex exposure has decreased from its peak of $8.2 trillion in 3Q08, at $3.2 trillion in 2Q09 the exposure is still is higher than 3Q07 levels. Even for Bank of America and Citi , the revenues from Interest rate and forex products have been volatile despite a moderate reduction in overall exposure. With top 5 banks having about 97% market share of the total banking industry notional amounts as of June 30, 2009, the revenues from trading activities for these banks are practically guaranteed to be highly volatile in the event of significant market disruption - a disruption aptly described by the esteemed Professor Roubini as a rush to the exit in the "Mother of All Carry Trades” as the largest macro experiment in the history of this country starts to unwind, or even if the participants in this carry trade think it is about to start to unwind.
The table below shows the trend in trading revenues from Interest rate and Forex positions for top banks in U.S.
Banks exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange contracts
With volatility in currency markets exploding to astounding levels (with average EUR-USD volatility of 16.5% over the past year (September 2008-09) compared to 8.9% over the previous year), commercial and investment banks trading revenues are expected to remain highly unpredictable. This, coupled with huge Forex and Interest rate derivative exposure for major commercial banks, could trigger a wave of losses in the event of significant market disruptions - or a race to the exit door of this speculative carry trade. Additionally most of these Forex and Interest rate contracts are over-the-contract (OTC) contracts with 96.2% of total derivative contracts being traded as OTC. This means no central clearing, no standardization in contracts, the potential for extreme opacity in pricing, diversity in valuation as well as a dearth of liquidity when it is most needed - at the time when everyone is looking to exit. Goldman Sachs has the largest OTC traded contracts with 98.5% of its derivative contracts traded over the counter. With the 5 largest banks representing 97% of the total banking industry notional amount of derivatives and most of these contracts being traded off exchange, the effectiveness of derivatives as a hedging instrument raises serious questions since most of these banks are counterparty to one another in one very small, very tight circle (see the free article, "As the markets climb on top of one big, incestuous pool of concentrated risk...").
The table below compares interest rate contracts and foreign exchange contracts for JPM, GS, Citi, BAC and WFC.
JP Morgan has the largest exposure in terms of notional value with $64,604
trillion of notional value of interest rate contracts and $6,977 trillion of
notional value of foreign exchange contracts. In terms of actual risk exposure
measured by gross derivative exposure before netting of counterparties, JP
Morgan with $1,798 bn of gross derivative receivable, or 21.7x of tangible
equity, has the largest gross derivative risk exposure followed by Bank of
America ($1,760 bn, or 18.1x). Bank of America with $1,393 bn of gross derivatives
relating to interest rate has the highest exposure towards interest rate sensitivity
while JP Morgan with $154 bn of Foreign exchange contracts has the highest
exposure from currency volatility. We have explored this in forensic detail
for subscribers, and have offered a free preview for visitors to the blog:
(JPM
Public Excerpt of Forensic Analysis Subscription 2009-09-18 00:56:22 488.64
Kb), which is free to download, and JPM
Report (Subscription-only) Final - Professional, or JPM
Forensic Report (Subscription-only) Final- Retail as well as a free blog
article on BAC off balance sheet exposure If
a Bubble Bubble Bursts Off Balance Sheet, Will Anyone Be There to Hear It?:
Pt 3 - BAC).
Subscribers, see WFC
Research Note Sep 2009 2009-09-30 13:01:30 281.29 Kb, ~ WFC
Off Balance Sheet Exposure 2009-10-19 04:25:53 258.77 Kb ~ WFC
Investment Note 22 May 09 - Retail 2009-05-27 01:55:50 554.15 Kb ~ WFC
Investment Note 22 May 09 - Pro 2009-05-27 01:56:54 853.53 Kb ~ Wells
Fargo ABS Inventory 2008-08-30 06:40:27 798.22 Kb to expound on our opinions
of Wells Fargo, below.
Subscribers, see MS
Simulated Government Stress Test 2009-05-05 11:36:25 2.49 Mb and MS
Stess Test Model Assumptions and Stress Test Valuation 2009-04-22 07:55:17
339.99 Kb
Tweet
Author: Reggie Middleton
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis. I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition, a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance, I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available, regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available - to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute, as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks, hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2012 Reggie Middleton
Circle Us