The ADP National Employment Report estimate for May is an increase in private
nonfarm payrolls of 55,000. Before revision, the April ADP estimated
an increase in private nonfarm payrolls of 32,000, subsequently revised to
an increase of 65,000. (Why does ADP revise its data? Does not the company
know with certainty how many payrolls it processed in a month?) The first guess
by the BLS for April private nonfarm payrolls was 231,000. The chart
below shows the difference between revised BLS and ADP estimates changes in
private nonfarm payrolls in the 12 months ended March. Over these 12 months,
the average absolute difference between revised BLS private nonfarm
payrolls and revised ADP private nonfarm payrolls has been about 83,000
- not insignificant from an economic "truthiness" perspective.
Chart 1
So, the ADP estimates of employment, even after revisions, do not provide
much guidance in forecasting BLS estimates of employment. Just as CDO2s do
not add much to the benefit of soceity, neither do ADP estimates of employment.
I find it amusing that the various pollsters of economic data forecasts bother
to ask economists for their forecasts of a useless estimate of something that
purports to forecast a BLS estimate, which, in itself, borders on useless what
with its birth/death adjustments etc. As CDO2s are just another trading vehicle,
the ADP Employment Reports are just another "stat" to bet on.
Now, I think the ADP employment estimates could actually provide valuable
economic information if their estimators did not try to replicate the
BLS estimates of nonfarm payrolls. Just as the weekly state unemployment insurance
data represent real people collecting real unemployment benefits, the underlying
data in the ADP employment estimates represent real people on real payrolls.
I would find the ADP underlying unadulterated data more important
than the adulterated BLS nonfarm payroll data.
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.