Milton Friedman taught us that the real economic cost of government is not
how it raises its funds - taxes or borrowing -- but how many funds in toto it
raises. That is, according to Friedman, the real economic cost of government
is how much it spends. The pending legislation on the increase in the U.S.
public debt ceiling dictates that federal outlays be reduced in the coming
10 fiscal years. So, the editorial board of the WSJ should be ecstatic
about the outcome of this debate about the debt-ceiling increase, right? Federal
spending will be decreased. But I suspect that very shortly the op-ed page
of the WSJ will be complaining about this pending debt-ceiling legislation.
What will be the nature of these complaints? That the legislation did not cut
federal outlays enough? Of course. But more than that, the editorial board
of the WSJ will be livid over the fact that marginal tax rates on personal
income will be rising, beginning January 1, 2013. Unless Congress passes legislation
and President Obama signs legislation to the contrary, the Bush 43 marginal
personal income tax rates will revert to those that prevailed at the end of
the Clinton administration. So, if the economy does not pick up between now
and November 2012, mark my words, the op-ed page of the WSJ will be full of
commentaries blaming the coming January 2013 tax rate hikes for this sorry
state of economic affairs. I still am waiting for the editorial board of the
WSJ to explain why the increase in marginal tax rates in 1993 were not associated
with ensuing inferior economic performance and the decrease in marginal income
tax rates, including those on capital gains and dividend income, starting in
2001 were not associated with ensuing superior economic performance.
But let me guess. When the marginal tax rates went up in 1993, it was expected that surely the
next president who took office in 2001 would reduce these tax rates. Similarly,
because the lower tax rates that commenced in 2001 were due to expire at the
end of 2010, it was expected that the rate structure would revert to
that of 1993. You can explain anything by introducing unmeasureable "expectations" and "uncertainty."
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.