The Catalyst for Consolidation in the Gold Sector

By: Jordan Roy-Byrne | Mon, Aug 22, 2011
Print Email

The Gold and Silver business is one that naturally involves consolidation. The industry product is the same and the business is such that mergers and acquisitions are commonplace. As many readers know, the secular bear market of the 1980s and 1990s had an obvious impact on the exploration side of the business. Larger mining companies cut exploration budgets because they had to. Fast forward to today and we know that has impacted supply and the ability of the large companies (who survived the bear market) to grow organically. Hence, mergers, acquisitions and takeovers will only increase. Yet we haven't seen much of this activity despite a raging bull market in the metals.

One thing to focus on is the performance of the large caps (GDX) relative the mid-caps and the larger juniors (GDXJ). The large-caps gains since 2008 occurred mostly from October 2008 to May 2009. In 2009 and 2010, the mid-caps and the large juniors performed much better than the large caps. This means that the relatively speaking it was becoming more expensive for the average acquirer to make an acquisition. However, as the chart shows, the large caps (GDX) have begun to outperform the smaller companies (GDXJ). Also, the large caps are very close to a big breakout while GDXJ is lagging behind.


Larger Image

It appears likely that the large caps, which are poised for a major breakout, will outperform over the next few months. This means that in some cases a potential acquirer will see its currency (its stock) rise in relation to a potential acquisition. If company A wants to acquire company B and company A's stock rises by 20% and company's B stock rises by 5%, then the acquisition becomes cheaper and less dilutive.

The last time the larger companies outperformed was in late 2008 and early 2009. That wasn't exactly a time you'd expect such companies to be making aggressive acquisitions. Today, Gold is raging and the market will soon demand growth from the large companies. Finally, unlike in 2009-2010 the larger stocks are performing better in nominal terms and better in real terms. The latter is crucial as it enables them to acquire assets at a better cost.

So how do investors play this development? In our premium service, we've focused on larger companies that have immediate growth potential are trending higher. Ultimately performance will filter down to the smaller companies and it will be time to add some risk to your portfolio. Additionally, one should focus on the smaller companies that have growth potential or are likely to be acquired. If you'd be interested in professional guidance then we invite you to consider our premium service.

Good Luck!

 


 

Jordan Roy-Byrne

Author: Jordan Roy-Byrne

Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT
www.thedailygold.com/newsletter
www.trendsman.com

Copyright © 2007-2014 Jordon Roy-Byrne

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright © Safehaven.com

SEARCH





TRUE MONEY SUPPLY

Source: The Contrarian Take http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelpollaro/
austrian-money-supply/