In addition to revisions to third-quarter GDP data, the Commerce Department
will release its first estimate of third-quarter corporate profits tomorrow,
November 29. As Chart 1 shows, quarter-to-quarter profit growth slowed sharply
in the second quarter - to 1.45% from 12.60% in the first quarter. Based on
third-quarter labor cost data, I suspect that third-quarter corporate profit
growth, measured sequentially, will remain tepid, at best. On a year-over-year
basis, however, corporate profit growth is likely to appear rosier given the
Katrina-depressed profits in the third quarter of 2005.
Chart 1
Here's the explanation. Chart 2 shows that in 2006, unit labor costs in the
nonfarm business sector are now consistently growing faster than the prices
nonfarm businesses receive for their goods and services. It can be shown algebraically
that growth in the implicit price deflator for nonfarm business output minus
growth in nonfarm business labor unit costs is equivalent to the gross revenues
of nonfarm businesses minus their total labor costs.
Chart 2
Because labor costs account for the majority of production costs in the United
States, rising growth in labor costs relative to the growth in total revenues
would be expected to have a negative impact on corporate profits. And, in fact,
this is exactly what the historical record shows, as demonstrated in Chart
3. Using annual average data, the contemporaneous correlation between these
two series is 0.69 out of a possible 1.00. With unit labor costs rising relative
to selling prices and with sales volumes slowing, it is difficult to see how
corporate profit growth in the near-term can be very strong. And if profit
growth slows, where will corporations get the funds to continue "retiring" equity
at a record pace - a factor supporting share prices and household deficit pending?
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.