Weekly Wrap-up: It's Dangerous to Love Oneself Too Much

By: Adam Oliensis | Mon, Dec 18, 2006
Print Email

Dear Speculators,

On its face one can understand the market's current infatuation with itself. This chart of the 3 basic kinds of Earnings per Share (EPS) for the S&P 500 (SPX) is indeed attractive.

The trends in all 3 of our Earnings per Share (EPS) lines remain robust. And quality of earnings is solid, with the disparity between Trailing Operating EPS (yellow) and Trailing Reported EPS (pink) on the small and non-volatile side. (Corporations are not taking big, bogus write-offs or one-time charges that tend to create big disparities between the yellow and pink lines.)

That said, the increasing weight of the Energy sector's importance in aggregate SPX earnings is worth a moment's concern.

Both Trailing and Forward EPS growth for the SPX Ex-Energy are considerably lower than for the SPX including Energy, which is to say that an outsized portion of earnings growth in the SPX is derived from the Energy patch, even in the context of recently stabilized energy prices. And that tends toward being inflationary, which is not a good thing for stocks.

Over the next 52 weeks growth in 7 of the 10 SPX sectors is now expected to be above the trend rate of growth for the broad index's earnings (trend growth is about 7%).

And while that looks like a very good thing (30% of sectors showing +14% growth or better!), one ought to keep in mind the market's capacity to disappoint, especially when disappointment is least expected.

Can the market live up to the expectations now being priced in? Let's look at that subject more closely.

Paul McCulley of PIMCO often discusses what he calls the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC's) "reaction function," by which I take him to mean roughly what the Fed will do in response to various inputs.

One of the more interesting inputs that appears to correlate quite strongly to the Y/Y change in the Fed Funds Rate (red line below) is the Y/Y change in the consensus of Forward 52-Week Operating Earnings per Share on the SPX (F52W EPS, blue line below).

The strength of this correlation looks meaningful as "all git-out" to me.

Of course, for about a year, beginning in September 2003 (black arrow) the Fed left rates quite low even as Y/Y growth in F52W EPS (the blue line) shot higher. The Fed was worried about deflation and consequently remained accommodative to a much greater extent than it had done previously. And that created a large if temporary gap between the soaring blue line and the depressed red line.

Subsequently, growth in F52W EPS slowed, dropping the blue line down from +20% down closer to +10%, creating a gap in the other direction between the blue and red lines. As one would expect, the Fed has followed suit, pausing, which has decelerated the Y/Y change in the Fed Funds rate to its current level of +0.9%, dropping the red line down again toward the falling blue line.

So, what now? Now that the Fed has removed much of the monetary stimulus provided by holding Fed Funds down at +1% (which allowed F52W EPS to soar to +20%), and then paused as growth in F52W EPS has decelerated, the question is, in the next year will the Fed remain on hold, cut rates, or raise rates?

And the answer lies, at least in part, in what happens to earnings. Currently F52W EPS are +12.5% higher than they were a year ago. And the consensus is calling for +9.4% growth relative to Trailing Operating EPS.

Should earnings growth continue to decelerate slowly toward the +7% area, which is the long-term trend rate of growth, then the Fed is likely to remain on hold. Should earnings reaccelerate, then the Fed is likely to begin tightening again. And if earnings growth slows to less than the +7% area, then we're probably due for rate cuts in 2007.

Now, as we discussed last week, forecasts are for about +2.5% real growth in GDP in 2007 (that's the Blue Chip Economists' November report) with the TIPS market projecting about +2.3% inflation. Add real GDP and inflation and you get Nominal GDP near +4.8%.

We looked at this chart last week, but it bears examining again.

With Nominal GDP (blue line) near +4.8% (yellow highlight), there is a strong tendency for earnings growth (red line) to be on the south side of zero. (Note: we did see EPS shoot up in '02-'04, ahead of GDP, but that was during the period of extreme monetary accommodation discussed above, and we suspect that such a period will not recur in the very near future.)

So, what does all this mean?

That it would be unlikely for economic growth to slow as much as, say, the bond market is discounting while stock market earnings growth continued at the above-trend rate that stocks appear to be discounting.

Could the normal-ish correlations that we're looking at break down? Yes, they could. The unusual is always possible. But in all likelihood, someone is wrong about what's going to happen. Either economic growth is going to be higher than now expected (in which case the Fed may be forced to raise the Fed Funds Rate, further inverting the Yield Curve and making PE expansion "iffy" at best) or else earnings growth is going to be slower than is now expected (which could also work at cross purposes to the PE Expansion thesis).

And what I'm talking about here is also represented in this next chart, which plots the market's PE on F52W EPS against the Yield Curve (spread between Fed Funds Rate and the 10yr Treasury Yield).

While last week's sell-off in bonds bounced the Yield Curve up and flatter to -0.63%, the trend in the curve continues to be underwater and down. Meanwhile the trend in the SPX PE continues to be up over the past 5 months.

The Yield Curve is saying "economic slowdown" while the stock market's PE continues to express relatively unqualified exuberance. Even if "all is well" as the SPX sounds like it's suggesting, it would be a healthier, less vulnerable market if it weren't quite so in love with its own prospects as well as with itself.

All that said, the stock market tends to be strong from the middle of December through the end of the year. So, it may take until early 2007 before the current surfeit of market euphoria plays itself out as choppier or falling stock prices.

Our cyclical view remains bullish through late in '07. But we would be looking for a period of consolidation and retrenchment to be coming sooner than later. The SPX is now tickling an important upside target and may well react with some distribution after hitting this target.

The May-June pullback of 107 points (from 1326 to 1219) has virtually been matched by the rally almost 107 points up over 1326. In this case the breakout is almost equal in height to the depth of the range from which the breakout occurred. This is a common measuring tool in Technical Analysis. And with the SPX having moved pretty much in a straight line up to the 1433-4 area (high of 1431 on Friday), it would make sense to look for signs of exhaustion.

Best regards and good trading!

 


 

Adam Oliensis

Author: Adam Oliensis

Adam Oliensis,
Editor The Agile Trader

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

ALL PERFORMANCE RESULTS ARE HYPOTHETICAL.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKET IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

DOG DREAMS UNLIMITED INC.(DDUI), WHICH OWNS AND OPERATES THE AGILE TRADER, HAS HAD LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CUSTOMERS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS, CUSTOMERS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS.

Trading commodity futures may involve large potential rewards, but also carries large potential risks. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures markets. Dont trade with money that you cannot afford to lose. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results.

The Agile Trader and all individuals affiliated with The Agile Trader assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results.

As a publisher of a financial newsletter of general and regular circulation, The Agile Trader cannot tender individual investment advice on the suitability and performance of your portfolio or specific investments. Refer to your registered investment adviser for individualized advice.

In making any investment decision, you will rely solely on your own review and examination of the facts and the records relating to such investments. Past performance of our recommendations is not an indication of future performance. The publisher shall have no liability of whatever nature in respect to any claims, damage, loss, or expense arising out of or in connection with the reliance by you on the contents of our Web site, any promotion, published material, alert, or update.

Trading commodity futures involves substantial risk of loss. DDUI and all individuals affiliated with DDUI assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results.

Copyright © 2003-2010 The Agile Trader, LLC All rights reserved.

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright © Safehaven.com