U.S. Current Account Deficit - Foreign Investors Making It Up On Volume?

By: Paul Kasriel | Tue, Dec 19, 2006
Print Email

What I found most interesting about the third quarter current account data was not that the U.S. deficit ran at a record annualized rate of $902.2 billion, nor that this represented 6.8% of nominal GDP, the second highest percentage since Q4:2005's 7.0%. No, what I found most interesting was, as shown in Chart 1, that for the fourth consecutive quarter, the U.S. ran a deficit in the income account. That is, for the fourth consecutive quarter, the income earned on foreign assets owned by U.S. entities was less than the income earned on U.S. assets owned by foreign entities. As Chart 1 shows, in the past 45 years it was a rare occurrence for the U.S. income account to be in deficit. Prior to the most recent four quarters, a deficit in the income account has occurred only four other times since 1960.

Chart 1

But a deficit in the income account probably is something we need to get used to. Why? When an entity - person, business or entire economy - runs a deficit, it means that it is borrowing from and/or selling assets to another entity. If a deficit is run persistently and at ever larger magnitudes, the lending entity starts to amass claims against the deficit entity in excess of its liabilities to the deficit entity. As Chart 2 shows, the U.S. has run a current account deficit in every year starting in 1982 except for a small surplus in 1992.

Chart 2

So, by running persistent current account deficits, the financial claims that the rest of the world has on the U.S. have been building up faster than the liabilities owed by the rest of the world to the U.S. As shown in Chart 3, this excess of foreign claims over liabilities reached $6 trillion in round numbers in the third quarter.

Chart 3

Even if the return on U.S. assets owned by foreign entities is less than the return on foreign assets owned by U.S. liabilities, the sheer magnitude of the net financial asset surplus position of the rest of the world at some point would turn the U.S. income account surplus into a negative. In other words, the rest of the world is "making it up on volume." What this deficit in the income account means is that the U.S. deficit in the goods/services account will have to narrow at a faster rate than otherwise if the overall current account deficit is to narrow. The arithmetic wind is now even more in our face if the current account deficit is to be narrowed.

By the way, it is not clear that Treasury Secretary Paulson's trip to China last week did much but to temporarily widen our current account deficit. After all, "tourism" is counted as an export to the country being visited. I would suggest that Secretary Paulson travel with a much smaller entourage in his next visit to China. Better yet, invite a large delegation of Chinese officials to the U.S. next time. At least this will work at the margin to narrow our current account deficit.

 


 

Paul Kasriel

Author: Paul Kasriel

Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research
The Northern Trust Company
Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675

Paul Kasriel

Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986 as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through 2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.

Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the American Bankers Association.

The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.

Copyright © 2005-2012 The Northern Trust Company

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright © Safehaven.com