Among the several economic reports due for publication this week -- new home
sales, existing home sales, consumer confidence measures, durable goods orders,
preliminary estimate of fourth quarter real GDP, and ISM manufacturing survey
results for February, construction outlays for January, and the personal income
and outlays report for January-- the Fed's preferred inflation measure
will garner a great deal of attention. The core personal consumption expenditure
(PCE) price index, which excludes food and energy, advanced 2.22% in December,
representing a deceleration from the 2.44% peak seen in August. This improvement
is important because core inflation is heading in the direction of the FOMC's
comfort zone of 1%-2%. However, after the January Consumer Price Index (CPI)
was reported, there were concerns about the January core PCE price index because
it is largely based on the CPI.
The main reason for the anxiety is the fact that the sharp 0.8% increase in
medical care prices was responsible for 60% of the increase in the core CPI.
Although the PCE price is based on the CPI but there are several differences
in terms of scope and weights of components. Medical care expenses (weight
was 17.1% in 2006) in the PCE price index are roughly three times the weight
of medical care in CPI (weight is 6.28% in 2007 ). The inputs used for the
medical care component of the PCE price index are broader in scope compared
with the medical care price index in the CPI and part of the medical care
price information is obtained from the Producer Price Index. Historically,
the year-to-year change in the two price indexes show a strong positive correlation
(see chart 1)
Chart 1
However, in recent years, the two price indexes have diverged and their movement
is not as close as seen previously.
Chart 2
Therefore, it is not clear, if the core PCE index of January (scheduled to
be published on March 1) will show a large increase as implied by the core
CPI. Chart 2 shows that medical care prices are advancing at a faster pace
in the CPI compared with the PCE.
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.