In the June 4th edition of The Wall Street Journal, Greg Ip has written a
piece explaining why the National Income and Product Account data, the data
from which GDP estimates are derived, can be confusing and erroneous for various
reasons (see "Options Hinder Efforts to Gauge Economic Growth,"). With a considerable
lag, the errors and omissions get corrected. In effect, Ip is illustrating
that the Fed and we mortals do not really know the current true state of the
economy at any given point in time. Well, if the Fed does not know where the
economy is in real time, how does it know the correct policy dial settings
in real time to get the economy where it wants it? This is one reason why I
and many before me, such as the late Professor Milton Friedman, have argued
that the Fed should not attempt to fine tune the behavior of the economy through
active and discretionary policy adjustments. Rather, the Fed should follow
a rule. Probably the best rule would be to re-adopt the gold standard. But
this is unlikely to occur in the lifetime of myself or anyone reading this
rant. So, as a second-best (maybe twentieth best) proposal, I recommend that
the Fed increase its balance sheet, essentially the reserves it creates for
the banking system plus the currency held by the non-bank public, at a rate
equal to the growth in the U.S. population. (For a fuller discussion of this
rule, see my commentaries October 17, 2003 'Greenspan's
Uncertainty Principle: Premise Accepted, Conclusion Rejected' and May 6,
2006 'Federal
Reserve and Inflation Targeting - First Do No Harm') If the Fed adopted
this rule, there would likely be no cumulative price increases of goods, services
and assets, which presumably the Fed would be pleased with. We would experience
business cycles, but they would be the result of "natural" real-side events,
not Fed-induced monetary events.
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.