Why have bond yields moved so violently upward this past week? Well, yes,
some of the data last week were stronger than expected. But come on, May nonfarm
payrolls increasing 157,000, getting a boost from 203,000 assumed (birth/death
adjustment) workers being added to unadjusted payrolls, and coming on the heels
of an 80,000 increase in April is hardly the stuff of the bond market massacre
we have witnessed this week. Central banks around the world raising rates?
This is nothing new. And with all due respect to the honorable Reserve Bank
of New Zealand, I don't think that a central bank of an economy with a lower
GDP than that of Chicago (I'm guessing here), could cause such a stir in the
U.S. bond market. Inflation? Last time I looked, inflation was moderating -
with or without food and energy. Shift in Fed policy expectations? Yes, two
Street firms through in the towel on 2007 Fed rate cuts this week, but they
were hold-outs. (Now it is just me and a few other diehards). No, for credible
explanation of the exaggerated move in bond yields this week, I think it is Wall
Street Journal columnist, Justin Lahart, who has put his finger on it ("Mortgage
Jitters May Account For Bond Selloff"). When bond yields started creeping up
a few weeks ago, mortgage portfolio prepayment risk started creeping down.
This meant that the massive amount of mortgages in portfolios needed fewer
non-callable Treasuries as duration maintainers. I am not saying that something perceived to
be fundamental by bond investors has not changed. But what Lahart is saying
is that the massive duration hedging required by mortgage portfolios acts as
a supercharger to fundamentally-induced changes in yields. Remember 1994?
I will, however, add one fundamental factor that may have played a smaller
role in this week's bond market selloff - foreign official holdings of U.S.
Treasury and Agency securities. As the chart below shows, in the week ended
Wednesday, June 6, there was a relatively large $12.5 billion reduction in
these custody holdings.
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.