The equity investing community seems to get giddy when it hears the words "stock
buyback." And why not if the stock is being bought back out of current profits?
But what if the corporation is increasing its debt to fund its stock buybacks?
The chart below suggests that is what is occurring now and what occurred in
the late 1980s and late 1990s. The red bars in the chart represent the dollar
amount of the net issuance of equities of nonfinancial corporations. Readings
below zero, which predominate, signify the net "retirement" of equities. As
the chart shows, record amounts of nonfinancial corporate equities are being
retired in this cycle. The blue line in the chart represents nonfinancial corporate
borrowing as a percent of their nominal capital spending. If the percentage
is rising, as it is now, then this indicates corporations are borrowing for
purposes other than to fund their capital spending. If corporate borrowing
is rising relative to capital spending and corporations are retiring equity,
then it is likely that they are borrowing to fund their share buybacks.
Chart 1
Equity investors do not seem alarmed that corporations are leveraging themselves
to fund stock buybacks. Would corporate borrowing to increase dividend payments
be greeted equally as gleefully?
As an aside, with some risk starting to be priced into the credit market,
funding stock buybacks via borrowing is getting more expensive. Ask Expedia.
It recently had plans to buyback 42% of its shares, predominantly with borrowed
funds. But with the credit markets having turned more discriminating in recent
weeks, Expedia has scaled back its repurchase plan to only 8% of its shares.
If creditors continue to become more risk averse and stocks begin to trade
on the outlook for profits rather than buybacks - well, I don't even want to
speculate on how long it will take to get the Dow up to 15,000 or maybe even
14,000.
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.