Like Beauty, the Value of Gold and the Dollar are in the Eye of the Beholder

By: John Lee | Fri, Feb 29, 2008
Print Email

Like beauty, the value of gold and the dollar are in the eye of the beholder, which at times can be entirely subjective, arbitrary, and irrational. This is much akin to financial speculations throughout history from stamps to sea shells.

Everyone has their theory on why the US dollar is sagging - huge deficits, slowing economy, high inflation, artificially low interest rates, subprime issues etc.

I am not sure if those factors are the cause or the effects of a sagging dollar.

  1. A $600 billion dollar Trade Deficit: It is a drop in the sea in magnitude when compared to world's investable dollars, pegged at over $100 trillion dollars. It is a fallacy to analyze the dollar based on trade deficits, much like analyzing the gold price based on physical supply and demand.
  2. A Slowing Economy: The economy grew 2% in 2002 when the dollar index reached all time high of 120. In 2007 GDP also grew 2% yet the dollar has just reached all time low of 74. The correlation between GDP and the dollar index is far from distinctive.
  3. Rising Inflation: Inflation is properly defined as an increase in money supply, which has been consistent at 10 - 15% a year growth in the last 20 years. While gold is reaching new record highs by the day, the money supply growth has actually slowed compared to past years as fewer people take out mortgages and loans.

Talk about a floating concept. The euro is no less abstract than the dollar, yet it now trades at a 50% premium to the dollar when it once traded at a 12% discount?

The dollar has stayed fiat for over thirty years since Nixon closed the gold window. If all dollars are fiat monies, and intrinsically a dollar is worth nothing today as it did ten years ago, then why the dollar crisis now?

The coming dollar crisis, in my view, has more to do with psychology and confidence. Let me expand.

If a co-worker asked you for a $100 handout, you would probably say no. If he asked you for a $100 loan which you gave and a year later he couldn't pay back, the result is a $100 loss, which is no different than the handout you had first refused. You were tricked.

Banks create dollars out of thin air and loan them to people. Even though money is created out of thin air, once the borrower pays back the loan, the transaction is complete and those borrowed dollars perish in bank's books. In this scenario, the dollar's purchasing power is preserved through non-dilution.

However, as we have witnessed through the recent subprime fiasco, many parties are getting away without fulfilling their obligation to repay a loan. Institutions were bailed out as the Fed bought their mortgage positions at face value with new money. Consumers were bailed out as lenders were elbowed to freeze foreclosures, freeze rate resets, forgive loans, and make lower payments.

Such compromises erode confidence in the system. If one person can get dollars through borrowing without paying back, and yet another had to work to obtain and save dollars, it is surely not an incentive to earn and keep dollars. Rather, it is a no brainer to borrow dollars and spend unabashedly. Savers are the most risk averse bunch of people, and when the monetary rules are muddied, they will opt out. This is how a run on the dollar starts.

Deflation and the Fed are mutually exclusive

The deflation camp has been on the wrong side throughout EVERY fiat money experiment thus far. The bear camp contends that the debt burden will eventually become so large that eventually the debt bubble will blow and the prices of everything stocks to real estate to copper and zinc will collapse.

Fiat money systems have always resorted to hyperinflation and destruction of the currency without fail. If hyperinflation could be avoided in a fiat system by the creation of the Fed, the Argentines in 2002 surely would have figured it out and avoided their hyperinflationary disaster.

The idea that the Fed and the government will allow debt cleansing lasses faire style is patently absurd in my opinion. Central bank action has spoken louder than words in the past six months as record $1 trillion+ has being printed to rescue banks. For instance, England's largest mortgage lender, Northern Rock, has been nationalized. And as for the consumers, loan amounts are reduced without penalty or conditions, mortgage rate resets are postponed, federal guarantee limits are set to increase.

Here we go back to psychology. It is not so much about the amount of bail out money being printed, but rather that the smart money took issue with the way the handouts were given unconditionally across the spectrum. Confidence in the dollar was further eroded.

The Fed is not the problem or the solution at this point.

The Fed's official stance is to ensure price stability. Many however begin to question what the Fed is doing by lowering rates amid record oil prices.

The USA today is world's largest debtor nation. Regardless of how high oil is, there is no room to raise rates with tens of trillions of dollars in debts to be serviced.

Don't blame Bernanke for our problems, even if Volcker were to be the chairman today, he would have acted in exact same way as Bernanke did.

The ideal dream for debtors is inflation, which is precisely what the Fed is advocating - expanding money supply through lowering interest rates and direct handouts. The Fed's action is entirely logical acting on behalf of the average American, which is heavily in debt.

What's next? Gold and prosperity.

The Sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening. There is nothing to stop it.

At this point, all the cards have been dealt and exposed. Gold is money and a refuge of capital when a defective fiat money system shows its ugly head. Gold is universally recognized, portable, divisible, liquid, and limited in supply which makes it the only real viable option as store of wealth. Today's gold price has not fully priced in dollar's deep and terminal issues and there is nothing that can be done to stop the further rise in gold. The Fed can talk tame CPI to try stabilizing commodity prices but the effect will be limited. Mind you, gold's rising popularity should be seen as positive, the fall of the dollar system levels the playing fields for global consumers and producers.

The markets can easily handle $3,000 - $5,000 oz. gold in the near term horizon with minimal disturbance. It is when gold rises too much over $5,000 too fast that we might start to worry about global inflation panic. My take is that over the next few years gold will establish a new equilibrium to fiat currencies, albeit at much higher level than today's $950/oz.



John Lee

Author: John Lee

John Lee, CFA
Executive Chairman,
Prophecy Development Corp.

JohnLee, CFA is an accredited investor with over 2 decades of investing experience in metals and mining equities. Mr. Lee joined Prophecy Development Corp ( in 2009 as the Company's Chairman. Under John Lee's leadership, Prophecy raised over $100 million through Toronto Stock Exchange and acquired a portfolio of silver assets in Bolivia, coal assets in Mongolia, and a Titanium project in Canada. John Lee is a Rice University graduate with degrees in economics and engineering.

Copyright © 2004-2016 John Lee

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright ©