"NEW YORK, March 20 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks jumped on Thursday, pushing
the Dow briefly up more than 1 percent, as a reading on factory activity
in the mid-Atlantic region fell by less than analysts' had forecast, improving
views on the U.S. economic outlook."
Tell me. On what basis did "analysts" have to predict what the Philly Fed
March factory activity headline would be? For that matter, on what basis do "analysts" have
for predicting what weekly initial jobless claims will be. At the end
of each week "analysts" are sent forms to fill out as to what their forecasts
are for economic reports to be released in the next week. For many of these
economic reports there is no way to accurately predict the data based on fundamentals -
seasonal variation, perhaps, but not underlying economic fundamentals.
Similarly, in this current environment, how can an equity analyst accurately
predict the earnings of an investment bank when it does not know how that bank
is valuing its Level 3 assets? So an investment bank reports that its earnings
are down 50% and its stock rallies because "analysts," on the basis of very
little, had predicted that its earning would fall by 70%.
The chart below shows the behavior of the headline index for the Philly Fed
region's factory activity. Notice that the headline was in deep negative territory,
but rising, as we entered the 2001 recession. The March reading of the
headline, at minus 17.4, is lower than where it was during most months of the
last recession. Yes, indeed, the Dow should rally on this because "analysts" had
predicted that the headline would be worse than it turned out. What nonsense!
Paul L. Kasriel
Director of Economic Research The Northern Trust Company Economic Research Department
Positive Economic Commentary
"The economics of what is, rather than what you might like it to be."
50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675
Paul joined the economic research unit of The Northern Trust Company in 1986
as Vice President and Economist, being named Senior Vice President and Director
of Economic Research in 2000. His economic and interest rate forecasts are
used both internally and by clients. The accuracy of the Economic Research
Department's forecasts has consistently been highly-ranked in the Blue Chip
survey of about 50 forecasters over the years. To that point, Paul received
the prestigious 2006 Lawrence R. Klein Award for having the most accurate economic
forecast among the Blue Chip survey participants for the years 2002 through
2005. The accuracy of Paul's 2008 economic forecast was ranked in the top five
of The Wall Street Journal survey panel of economists. In January 2009, The
Wall Street Journal and Forbes cited Paul as one of the few who identified
early on the formation of the housing bubble and foresaw the economic and financial
market havoc that would ensue after the bubble inevitably burst. Through written
commentaries containing his straightforward and often nonconsensus analysis
of economic and financial market issues, Paul has developed a loyal following
in the financial community. The Northern's economic website was listed as one
of the top ten most interesting by The Wall Street Journal. Paul is the co-author
of a book entitled Seven Indicators That Move Markets.
Paul began his career as a research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago. He has taught courses in finance at the DePaul University Kellstadt
Graduate School of Business and at the Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate
School of Management. Paul serves on the Economic Advisory Committee of the
American Bankers Association.
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of The Northern Trust Company. The information herein is
based on sources which The Northern Trust Company believes to be reliable,
but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject
to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.