| From: | "Henry C.K. Liu" |
| Received: | 12/30/2005 07:39 AM |
| Subject: | Re: Doomsday for the Greenback |
The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War With Iraq:
A Macroeconomic and Geostrategic Analysis of the Unspoken Truth
by William Clark
Original Essay January 2003
William Clark's The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War With Iraq:
A Macroeconomic and Geostrategic Analysis of the Unspoken Truth,
written in January 2003, quoted me on dollar hegemony as follows:
The following excerpts from an Asia Times article discusses the virtues
of our petrodollar hegemony (or vices from the perspective of developing
nations, whose debt is denominated in dollars).
"Ever since 1971, when US president Richard Nixon took the dollar
off the gold standard (at $35 per ounce) that had been agreed to at
the Bretton Woods Conference at the end of World War II, the dollar
has been a global monetary instrument that the United States, and
only the United States, can produce by fiat. The dollar, now a fiat
currency, is at a 16-year trade-weighted high despite record US
current-account deficits and the status of the US as the leading
debtor nation. The US national debt as of April 4 was $6.021
trillion against a gross domestic product (GDP) of $9 trillion.
"World trade is now a game in which the US produces dollars and the
rest of the world produces things that dollars can buy. The world's
interlinked economies no longer trade to capture a comparative
advantage; they compete in exports to capture needed dollars to
service dollar-denominated foreign debts and to accumulate dollar
reserves to sustain the exchange value of their domestic currencies.
To prevent speculative and manipulative attacks on their currencies,
the world's central banks must acquire and hold dollar reserves in
corresponding amounts to their currencies in circulation. The higher
the market pressure to devalue a particular currency, the more
dollar reserves its central bank must hold. This creates a built-in
support for a strong dollar that in turn forces the world's central
banks to acquire and hold more dollar reserves, making it stronger.
This phenomenon is known as dollar hegemony, which is created by the
geopolitically constructed peculiarity that critical commodities,
most notably oil, are denominated in dollars. Everyone accepts
dollars because dollars can buy oil. The recycling of petro-dollars
is the price the US has extracted from oil-producing countries for
US tolerance of the oil-exporting cartel since 1973.
"By definition, dollar reserves must be invested in US assets,
creating a capital-accounts surplus for the US economy. Even after a
year of sharp correction, US stock valuation is still at a 25-year
high and trading at a 56 percent premium compared with emerging
markets.
". . . The US capital-account surplus in turn finances the US trade
deficit. Moreover, any asset, regardless of location, that is
denominated in dollars is a US asset in essence. When oil is
denominated in dollars through US state action and the dollar is a
fiat currency, the US essentially owns the world's oil for free. And
the more the US prints greenbacks, the higher the price of US assets
will rise. Thus a strong-dollar policy gives the US a double
win." [19 <http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html#fn19>]
19 Liu, Henry C K, "US dollar hegemony has got to go
<http://www.atimes.com/global-econ/DD11Dj01.html>," Asia Times, April
11, 2002
My view on dollar hegemony is more fundamental than oil being
denominated in dollars. Oil is only one of the major commodities; and
all commodities are denominated in dollars, from metals to agricultural
produce. The importance of oil, though not minor, is often over
emphasized in global economics and finance. The world consumes about 30
billion barrels of oil annually. At $60 per barrel, the oil bill comes
to $1.8 trillion per year. World GDP is about $56 trillion in 2004.
World oil consumption constitutes about 3.3% of world GDP. The GDP of
France alone is $2 trillion. The dollar repo market alone trades over $5
trillion daily. During the first quarter of 2005, the notional amount
of derivatives in insured commercial bank portfolios increased by $3.2
trillion to $91.1 trillion. The notional amount of interest-rate
contracts increased (by $2.5 trillion) to $78 trillion. The notional
value of foreign-exchange contracts decreased (by $94 billion) to $8.5
trillion. This figure excludes spot foreign-exchange contracts, which
increased (by $319 billion) to $738 billion. Credit derivatives
increased (by $777 billion) to $3.1 trillion. Equity, commodity and
other contracts increased (by $87 billion) to $1.5 trillion. Total debt
in the US economy now runs to $40 trillion as of March 2005, of which
$31 trillion is private-sector debt, 66% ($21 trillion) of which has
been added since 1990 under Greenspan's watch. That is 20% of 2004 GDP
and more than a decade of world oil consumption cost at current prices.
This figure is consistent with the fact that it now takes 25% more money
in the money supply to support a given GDP than 25 years ago.
The euro in its current form can never replace the dollar. With the
exception of some minor African states, there is no precedent in history
where a monetary union preceded a political union. Already in Italy
cries to restore the lira are increasingly vocal. But the main reason is
that there is not enough euro in circulation to replace the dollar and
the ECB is not about to print more euro than its inflation-aversed
ideology would permit. As of July 28, 2005, dollar M3 was $9.7 trillion
against a $11 trillion GDP. But the amount of euro-dollar is huge, and
with derivative contracts the amount of notional value in dollars is
several hundred trillions. No one knows for sure how much. Dollar
hegemony is more than oil. The prospect of the dollar going up or down
against other major currencies poses no threat dollar hegemony. The
threat can only come from changes in the terms of trade. It is to the
advantage of exporting economies to be paid in their own currencies and
it is to the advantage of importing economies to pay in their own
currencies. The US can pay for its imports and deficits in dollars
because of dollar hegemony. OPEC countries cannot demand payment in
their own currencies because there is no OPEC currency and the component
currencies are all tied to the dollar and not gold. There is talk about
a gold dinar but, like the euro, there is not enough gold to replace the
dollar unless gold goes to $30K per ounce. All the talk of a dollar
crashing is only Chicken Little indication of lack of clear thinking.
The dollar has in fact fallen more than 30% from its peak against some
currencies, but US asset prices have risen dramatically while the
current account deficit keeps rising. A rising dollar is no longer in
the US national interest, because it will bring on domestic deflation.
As for Iraq, the US went into Iraq with a host of policy delusions, and
protection US control of Iraqi oil is one of the delusions. The fact is
that oil is not good to Saddam unless it is sold (and whether for dollar
or ouro makes no difference) and the talk about taking euro for oil is
just chest-pounding street propaganda. The US, through dollar hegemony,
already controls the world's oil financially; there is no need to invade
any country merely to control its oil. Under the current international
finance architecture, the euro is nothing more than a derivative
currency of the dollar, like the yen. Diversification from dollar
holding by foreign central banks is a value enhancement tactic, not a
fundamental challenge to dollar hegemony.
Henry C.K. Liu
Sharefin wrote:
>
>
>
>http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mike_whi_051229_doomsday_for_the_gre.htm
>
>
>
>You are subscribed to the SafeHaven Longwaves Forum
>
>To Unsubscribe, send a blank email to with the word Unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven Forums are those of the individual
authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven, its
management, or the forum moderators. » |
|