Safe Haven | Preservation of Capital
"Everything should be made as simple as
possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
HOME ARCHIVES FORUMS SEARCH SITE MAP ABOUT US
Forums -> Longwaves Forum -> Re:Debt Deflation BIS Report 2005

<<- Previous Message Next Message ->>
<- Previous In Thread Next In Thread ->
From:"James"
Received:07/04/2008 02:33 PM
Subject:Re:Debt Deflation BIS Report 2005

This BIS piece tends to give a grossly misleading impression, in that it draws no distinction between the two periods which have marked the post-WW2 period, the first between 1945 and 1969/71 and the second after 1971; and, in failing to draw this distinction, it tends to place the blame for inflation and the increase in indebtedness on "automatic stabilisers" and the "welfare state."
This is mischievous. The automatic stabilisers and the extraordinary benefits that flowed from the welfare state were undone by the errors, in both macroeconomic and business reasoning, committed in  and after 1969 by the Nixon Administration and the Federal Reserve Board and their successors.
Policies then adopted guaranteed that there would be inflation and that the welfare state would be accused of being a major cause of it. Largely as a consequence and bearing in  mind particularly the irresponsible policies of the 1980s and afterwards in the cult of the free market and small governmwent, the welfare state has survived only in diminished form and the economic stability and growth - in  REAL terms - of the period from 1945 to 1969 has vanished in feverish speculative greed which has spread around the world.
Since this is the Fourth of July, it is appropriate to note that the policy errors and indeed the errors of theoretical economics which have marked the period after 1969 have diminished the power of the United States itself - enormously in relative terms and in some respects even absolutely.
It will be only if the United States, hopefully through its democratic institutions but especially through the good sense and strong will of its people, can resolve the complex of economic and financial problems which they have inflicted on themselves in the last forty years, that the United States will stand a chance of regaining its former status in every respect - socially, economically, politically and strategically.
We cannot be sure - we can only hope - that, as the extent of the present financial catastrophe becomes manifest, a realistic review and reappraisal of the policies of the past forty years will NECESSARILY be made and policies swiftly formulated which will deliver us from the miseries - and the enormous security dangers - which currently confront us.
The changes will have to be fundamental and widespread and, inevitably, they will take time to implement. We can only pray that the global political and strategic environment will permit a peaceful transition to safer and more prosperous times.  
 
 
 
 
James Cumes
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Sharefin
To:
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: [Longwaves Forum]Re: Debt Deflation BIS Report 2005

1913 (:-))))
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To:
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:45 PM
Subject: [Longwaves Forum]Debt Deflation BIS Report 2005

THE SUPERCYCLE OF DEBT  BCA

"The Supercycle is a description of the long-term decline in balance sheet liquidity and rise in indebtedness during the post-WWII period. Economic expansions have always been associated with a build-up of leverage. However, prior to the introduction of automatic stabilizers such as the welfare state and deposit insurance, balance sheet excesses tended to be fully unwound during economic downturns, albeit at the cost of severe declines in activity.

"Government policies to smooth out the business cycle were successful in preventing the frequent depressions that plagued the pre-WWII economy, but the downside was that the balance sheet imbalances and financial excesses built up during each expansion phase were never fully unwound.

"Periodic 'cyclical' corrections to the trend occurred during recessions, but these were not enough to reverse the long-run trend. Each time that liquidity was rebuilt during a recession, it failed to bring the level back to the previous recovery high. Meanwhile, the liquidity rundown during the next expansion phase established new lows.

"These trends led to growing illiquidity, vulnerability and volatility in the financial markets. The greater the degree of illiquidity in the economy, the greater the threat of deflation. Thus, the bigger that balance sheet excesses become, the more painful the corrective process would be. So, the stakes have become higher in each cycle, putting ever-increasing pressure on the authorities to reflate demand, by whatever means are available. The Supercycle process is driven over time by the building tension between rising underlying deflationary risks in the economy, and the ability of policymakers to create inflation."

From there let us go a quote brought to my attention by Michael Lewitt in the HCM Market Letter by economist Joseph Schumpeter. Schumpeter was a famous economist who brought us the insight that capitalism is a form of Creative Destruction, which we will look at in more detail below. As you read the following, think about the nature of our current recovery. Is the stimulus for the current recovery real or is it artificial?

"Our analysis leads us to believe that recovery is only sound if it does come from itself. For any revival which is merely due to artificial stimulus leaves part of the work of depression undone and adds, to an undigested remnant of maladjustments, new maladjustments of its own." - Schumpeter

 

So as with every credit bubble that unwinds its excesses, the only question is, where is the starting pointÂ…1994, 1987, 1982 or 1949? 

 

Joseph

 


You are subscribed to the SafeHaven Longwaves Forum To Unsubscribe, send a blank email to with the word Unsubscribe in the subject line.

You are subscribed to the SafeHaven Longwaves Forum To Unsubscribe, send a blank email to with the word Unsubscribe in the subject line.

 

<<- Previous Message Next Message ->>
<- Previous In Thread Next In Thread ->

 

« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven Forums are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven, its management, or the forum moderators. »

 
 
Top of Page
Read ourDISCLAIMER
HOME | ARCHIVES | FORUMS | SEARCH | SITE MAP
ABOUT US | LINKS | CONTACT US
Copyright © 2000-2008 - SAFEHAVEN.com
ColdFusion by COSTAS PILIOTIS
Server Admin by DIGITAL ADMIN
SafeHaven Web Site FEEDS
Get RSS Feeds